期刊文献+

T—Scan Ⅲ咬合分析系统测量正常[牙合][牙合]力分布初探 被引量:13

Normal occlusion study: using T-Scan Ⅲ occlusal analysis system
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨正常[牙合]不同[牙合]位[牙合]力分布规律,以期为临床提供参考。方法选择正常[牙合]志愿者53名,男性29名,女性24名,年龄20—31岁[平均(25.9±2.1)岁],使用T—Scan Ⅲ咬合分析系统,测量正常[牙合]牙尖交错[牙合]、前伸[牙合]及侧方[牙合]各牙的[牙合]力百分比及咬合时间,分析侧方[牙合]的[牙合]接触类型。结果正常[牙合]牙尖交错[牙合]时[牙合]力百分比最大的牙位依次为7、7、6和6,分别为(18.7±7.5)%、(15.7±7.1)%、(13.6±5.4)%和(13.3±4.3)%,7654 4567为[牙合]力集中区,[牙合]力百分比为(61.3±12.4)%;左侧[牙合]力百分比[(46.4±7.0)%]显著小于右侧[(53.6±7.0)%](P〈0.05)。前伸[牙合]时21 12为[牙合]力集中区,[牙合]力百分比为(85.1±25.5)%,左前区(123)与右前区(321)的[牙合]力百分比分别为(49.2±26.4)%和(48.1±26.6)%,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.15,P〉0.05)。左侧方[牙合]时尖牙保护[牙合]占28%(13/46),组牙功能[牙合]占33%(15/46),多重保护[牙合]占39%(18/46);右侧方验时尖牙保护[牙合]占30%(14/46),组牙功能[牙合]占44%(20/46),多重保护[牙合]占26%(12/46);侧方验时拾力升高时间和咬合分离时间分别为(0.34±0.11)和(1.00±0.39)s。结论20~30岁正常[牙合]牙尖交错[牙合]时第一前磨牙至第二磨牙是[牙合]力集中区,第二磨牙受力最大;前伸[牙合]时[牙合]力集中于21 12,侧方[牙合][牙合]接触类型具有多样性。 Objective To investigate the normal occlusal force distribution and the characteristics of the occlusion time at different occlusion position using T-Scan Ⅲoeclusal analysis system. Methods Fifty-three volunteers with normal occlusion, including 29 males and 24 females, were included in this study. The average age was ( 25.9 ± 2. 1 ) years old. T-Scan Ⅲocelusal analysis system was used to measure the oeelusal force distribution and the time character of normal occlusion at intercuspal position, protrusive position, and lateral excursive position. Results At intereuspal position the left and right side molar teeth took the most part of force percentage, followed by ( 13.3 ± 4.3 ) % , ( 13.6 ± 5.4) % , ( 15.7 ± 7. 1 ) %, (18.7±7.5)% ( [6 , 6 , 17, 71 ); and 7654 4567took (61.3±12.4)% force percentage; and the left and right sides took the respective percentages of (46.4 ± 7.0)% , (53.6 ± 7.0)% , the left side was significantly less than the right side (P 〈 0. 05 ). At the protrusion position the region (21/12) commitment to take the percentage of ( 85.1 ± 25.5 ) %. At left and right lateral position, 28% (13/46) and 30% (14/46) were cuspid-protected occlusion, and 33% (15/46) and 44% (20/46) were group fuctional occlusion, and 39% (18/46) and 26% (12/46) were multiple-protected occlusion. The average occlusion time was (0. 34 ± 0. 11 ) s, and diselusion time was ( 1.00 ± 0. 39 ) s. Conclusions At intercuspal position the region from first premolar to second molar teeth were the occlusal force centers, and the second molar is the most;, the force concentrated in the area (21 112) at the protrusion position. The lateral occlusal pattern is multiformity.
出处 《中华口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期363-367,共5页 Chinese Journal of Stomatology
基金 基金项目:教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20090001110101)
关键词 牙[牙合] 咬合力 咬合时间 [牙合]接触类型 Dental occlusion Bite force Occlusion time Occlusal pattern
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1韩科,张豪.恰学理论与临床实践.北京:人民军医出版社,2008:64.
  • 2Gonz61ez Sequeros O, Garrido Garcfa VC, Garcia Cartagena A. Study of occlusal contact variability within individuals in a position of maximum intercuspation using the T-SCAN system. J Oral Rehabil, 1997, 24(4) : 287-290.
  • 3程蕙娟,耿屹,张富强.正常牙尖交错位咬合的T-Scan Ⅱ系统分析[J].上海口腔医学,2012,21(1):62-65. 被引量:15
  • 4胡志刚,郑明,程辉,程祥荣.正常牙尖交错位咬合接触的动态研究[J].福建医科大学学报,2004,38(2):173-175. 被引量:17
  • 5Koos B, Godt A, Schille C, et al. Precision of an instrumentation- based method of analyzing occlusion and its resulting distribution of forces in the dental arch. J Orofac Orthop, 2010, 71 ( 6 ) : 403-410.
  • 6Kerstein RB. Current applications of computerized occlusal analysis in dental medicine. Gen Dent, 2001, 49(5) : 521-530.
  • 7Kerstein RB. Disclusion time measurement studies: a comparison of disclusion time between chronic myofascial pain dysfunction patients and nonpatients: a population analysis. J Prosthet Dent, 1994, 72(5) : 473-480.
  • 8Makofsky H. The effect of head posture on muscle contact position: the sliding cranium theory. Cranio, 1989, 7 ( 4 ) : 286-292.
  • 9Garcia Cartagena A, Gonzalez Sequeros O, Garrido Garcia VC. Analysis of two methods for occlusal contact registration with the T-Scan system. J Oral Rehabil, 1997, 24 (6) : 426-432.
  • 10Sarao lu A, Ozpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 88(5): 522-526.

二级参考文献50

  • 1郑明,胡志刚,程辉.咬合力分析系统及咬合片的可重复性[J].福建医科大学学报,2005,39(2):229-230. 被引量:6
  • 2胡志刚,程辉,程祥荣.T-Scan II系统在口腔医学中的应用[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2006,7(2):142-145. 被引量:18
  • 3安薇薇,王邦康,白玉兴.T-scanⅡ咬合分析仪记录结果可重复性的临床评价[J].北京口腔医学,2006,14(2):112-115. 被引量:20
  • 4王琰玲,殷新民.侧方咬合运动中接触型及其分布特征[J].口腔医学,2007,27(3):136-138. 被引量:5
  • 5王毓英.he学(第一版)[M].北京:北京医科大学口腔医学院,1985.29.
  • 6徐樱华.实用.he学(第一版)[M].成都:四川大学出版社,1990.32.
  • 7Academy of Prosthodontics. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Tearms [J]. J Prosthet Dent,2005,94( 1 ) :10 -92.
  • 8Ogawa T, Ogimoto T, Koyano K. Pattern of occlusal contacts in lateral position: canine protection and group function validity in classifying guidance patterns[ J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 1998,80 ( 1 ) :67 - 74.
  • 9Marklund S, Wanman A. A century of controversy regarding the benefit or detriment of occlusal contacts on the mediotrusive side [J]. J Oral Rehabil,2000,27(7):553 -562.
  • 10Baba K,Tsukiyama Y, Clark GT. Reliability,validity and utility of various occlusal measurement methods and techniques[ J]. J Prosthel Dent ,2000,83 ( 1 ) :83 - 89.

共引文献36

同被引文献153

引证文献13

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部