摘要
目的 应用气压气流技术比较不同语系的音声特点。方法 5 0例唇腭裂患者 ,含 2例腭咽闭合功能不全 ,男性 30例 ,女性 2 0例 ;年龄 4 9～ 5 4 2岁 ,平均 11 74岁。被检音为汉语 henpi 、日语 pipi 和英语 hemper 。发声时测定口腔、鼻腔气压 ,鼻腔气流速度和腭咽腔闭合时的最小面积 ,并使用统计软件 (SPSS)对数据进行处理和分析。结果 汉语与英语、日语的口腔、鼻腔压力 ,鼻腔气流速度和腭咽腔闭合时的最小面积均无显著性差异 (P >0 0 5 ) ,而英语与日语之间有明显性差异 (P <0 0 1)。结论 本研究结果可能与各语系的元音和被检音相关 。
Objective To compare articulation of various language families using the pressure-flow technique.Methods 50 patients(30 males,20 females)with cleft lip and/or palate,including 2 patients with velopharyngeal incompetence,were available for study. Subjects ranged in age from 4.9 to 54.2 years with a mean age of 11.74 years.The utterance studied were Chinese /henpi/,Japanese/pipi/and English/hemper/.The pressure-flow technique was used to measure intraoral air pressure,intranasal air pressure,nasal airflow velocity and the minimum area of velopharyngeal closure during the utterance.The data acquired were analyzed by SPSS software.Results The data failed to show significant difference in intraoral air pressure,intraoral air pressure,nasal airflow velocity and the minimum area of velopharyngeal closure between Chinese and Japanese or English(p>0.05),but it revealed significant difference between Japanese and English(p<0.01).Conclusions The results of this study may be related to vowels of various language families and the utterance studied,but it has not definite interpretation.The further study is needed.
出处
《听力学及言语疾病杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2000年第3期159-161,共3页
Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology
基金
中国卫生部!(981-317)
国家教委!(98-679)科研基金资助
关键词
气压气流技术
语系
唇腭裂
Pressure-flow technique Language family Cleft lip and/or palate
