摘要
审判方式与审判制度功能之间存在天然联系。对制度功能不同方面的侧重会外在地体现为对审判方式的不同要求,审判方式的实际适用情况又影响甚至决定着制度功能的实然状况。新《刑事诉讼法》继续保留了全面审查原则,对刑事二审的功能定位基本没有调整,但改变了刑事二审"开庭为原则、不开庭为例外"的规定,明确了二审应当开庭的情况,制度功能预期与审判方式之间存在一定错位。根据我国刑事二审制度功能定位,审判方式的具体适用应注意严格把握不开庭审理的条件、规制二审法院选择审判方式的裁量权、保障开庭审理质量等问题。
Review manners have a natural connection with the functions of criminal second instance. The balance of criminal second instance functions is reflected by the design of review manners, and the practical ap- plication of review manners influences, even determines, the actual status of second instance functions. The new Criminal Procedure Law keeps the complete review principle, which indicates that there is little adjustment in the area of second instance functions ; however, the original provision of review manners is changed, the re- sult of which is that opening a court session is no more a fundamental requirement. A gap emerges between the expectation of second instance functions and the review manners. According to the orientation of criminal sec- ond instance functions, when the review manners are applied in particular cases, the following aspects should be attached importance to： strictly qualifying the situations where opening session is not required, regulating the court＇s discretion in choosing review manners, as well as guaranteeing the quality of opening session.
出处
《上海大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期131-140,共10页
Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
刑事二审程序
审判方式
制度功能
全面审查
开庭审理
criminal second instance functions
review manners
system functions
complete review
opening a court session
