期刊文献+

脉压变异预测失血性休克家猪血容量的实验研究 被引量:1

The study on volume state prediction by pulse pressure variation in shock pigs
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨脉压变异(PPV)对失血性休克家猪血容量状态评价的准确性并与每搏输出量变异(SVV)比较。方法将10只健康家猪充分镇静肌松,给予机械通气,通过正常血容量、失血量10%、20%、30%和40%5个阶段建立失血性休克家猪模型,每个阶段5min内完成释放相应血容量,稳定10min后采用脉搏指示连续心排血量(PiCCO)监测HR、MAP、CVP、心脏指数(CI)、每搏量指数(SVI)、外周血管阻力指数(SVRI)、胸腔内血容量指数(ITBVI)、SVV和PPV等血流动力学指标的变化。结果与正常血容量比较,失血量20%、30%、40%的家猪HR明显增快(P<0.05),失血量30%、40%的家猪MAP、CVP明显降低(P<0.05),失血量10%、20%、30%和40%的家猪SVI明显降低,而SVV和PVV明显升高(P<0.05),失血量30%、40%的家猪CI,失血量20%、30%和40%的家猪ITBVI明显降低(P<0.05)。SVV和PPV与失血量相关系数分别为0.699和0.764(P<0.05),SVV和PPV与CI变化值(ΔCI,各失血阶段与正常血容量的差值)的相关性均较好,相关系数分别为0.795和0.736(P<0.05)。ITBVI的变化值(ΔITBVI)、CVP变化值(ΔCVP)与CI相关系数分别为0.734和0.499(P<0.05),相关系数明显小于SVV和PPV。ITBVI、CVP与失血量相关系数分别为0.895、0.768(P<0.05)。结论 PPV和SVV均可以准确反映失血性休克时的血容量状态,并且在休克早期即出现明显变化。 Objective To evaluate the validity of pulse pressure variation(PPV) for predicting volume state in hemorrhagic shock pigs by comparing with stroke volume variation (SW). Methods Ten healthy pigs were anesthetized after tracheal intubation and ventilated. Then the pigs were bled from 10% up to 40% of their blood volume by increments of 10% (normal volume, 10%, 20%,30%0 and 40% stage), within 5 rain between each stage. Hemodynamic measurements heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), intrathoratic blood volume(ITBVI). PPV and SW were obtained 10 minutes after stabilization. Results PPV and SW increased significantly in early period (blood loss of 10%) in hemorrhagic shock(P〈0. 05), while SVI decreased on the 10% stage(P〈0. 05). CI and ITBVI decreased gradually when the blood loss achieved 20% (P〈0. 05), with HR increased(P〈0.05). CVP and MAP decreased after the blood loss achieved 30%(P〈0. 05). PPV and SW showed significant positive correlation with blood loss volume (r= 0. 699, r=0. 764, P〈0.05) ,moreover APPV and ASW also showed positive correlation to CI (r=0. 795, r=0. 764, P〈 0.05), which were prior to CVP (r=0. 499). Conclusion PPV and SW could predict volume change in early period of hemorrhagic shock.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期495-497,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
基金 南京市卫生局重点项目(ZKX0417)
关键词 失血性休克 容量 每搏输出量变异 脉压变异 Hemorrhagic shock Volume Stroke volume variation Pulse pressure variation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest,2002, 121 (6) : 2000-2008.
  • 2Kwan I, Bunn F, Roberts I. Timing and fluid administration for patients with bleeding. Coehrane Database Syst Rev, 2003, CD002245.
  • 3Daniel D, Sarah H, Michael P,et al. Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. In- tensive Care Med, 2005,31 (4) : 517-523.
  • 4张义轩,马传根,徐靖宇,王勇,宋冬梅,李爱香,刁玉领.高渗氯化钠羟乙基淀粉40注射液对外伤性颅内血肿伴失血性休克患者术中颅内压的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2011,27(5):467-469. 被引量:6
  • 5Shults C, Sailhamer EA, Li Y, et al. Surviving blood loss without fluid resuscitation. J Trauma,2008,64(3):629-640.
  • 6Sakka SG, Bredle DL, Reinhart K, et al. Comparison be- tween intrathoracic blood volume and cardiac filling pressures in the early phase of hemodynamic stability of patients with septic shock. J Crit Care, 1999,14(2) : 78-83.
  • 7Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Zeravik J, Pfeiffer UJ. Intrathoracic blood volume accurately reflects circulatory volume status in cirtically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med, 1992,18(3) : 142-147.
  • 8Abreu GF, Coelho AR, Aguiar JL, et al. Cardiocirculatory changes in hemorrhagic shock induced in pigs submitted to three distinct therapeutic methods1. Acta Cir Bras, 2010,25 (1) : 126-130.
  • 9Cotton BA, Guy JS, Morris JA Jr, et al. The cellular, meta- bolic, and systemic consequences of aggressive fluid resuscita- tion strategies. Shock, 2006,26 (2) : 115-121.
  • 10李冬梅,李文志,郭悦平,张莉莉,周华成,田野.失血性休克对猪一氧化氮与内皮素的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(4):314-316. 被引量:2

二级参考文献31

  • 1黑子清,张劲军,林世清,刘克玄,陈秉学.黄芪对失血性休克再灌注大鼠小肠粘膜iNOS和ET蛋白表达的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(5):316-317. 被引量:6
  • 2Osman D,Ridel C,Ray P,et al.Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict nomodynamic response to volume challenge[J].Crit Care Med,2007,35(1):64-68.
  • 3Monnet X,Teboul JL.Volume responsiveness[J].Curr Opin Crit Care,2007,13(5):549-553.
  • 4Durairaj L,Schmidt GA.Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis:less is more[J].Chest,2008,133(1):252-263.
  • 5Zimmermann M,Feibicke T,Keyl C,et al.Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2010,27(6):555-561.
  • 6Hofer CK,Senn A,Weibel L,et al.Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTracTMand PiCCOplusTM system[J].Critcal Care,2008,12(3):82.
  • 7Levy MM,Fink MP,Marshall JC,et al.2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference[J].Crit Care Med,2003,31(4):1250-1256.
  • 8van Lelyveld-Haas LE,van Zanten AR,Borm GF,et al.Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1 A in critically ill patients[J].Eur J Anesthesiol,2008,25(11):917-924.
  • 9Phillips R,Lichtenthal P,Sloniger J,et al.Noninvasive cardiac output measurement in heart failure subjects on circulatory support[J].Anesth Analg,2009,108(3):881-886.
  • 10Marik PE,Baram M,Vahid B.Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness ?:A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares[J].Chest,2008,134(1):172-178.

共引文献43

同被引文献13

  • 1Vester - Andersen M, LundstrCm LH, Mzller MH, et al. Mortalityand postoperative care pathways after emergency gastrointestinal surgery in 2904 patients : a population - based cohort study [ J ]. Br J Anaesth, 2014, 112(5) : 860 -870.
  • 2Anjaria DJ, Mohr AM, Deitch EA. Haemorrhagic shock therapy [J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2008, 9(6) : 901 -911.
  • 3Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE]I: a severity of disease classification system[ J ]. Crit Care Med, 1985, 13 (10) : 818 -829.
  • 4Ahuja A, Pal R. Prognostic scoring indicator in evaluation of clini- cal outcome in intestinal perforations[ J ]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2013, (9) : 1953 - 1955.
  • 5Wahrhaftig KM, Correia LC, Matias D, et al. Does the RIFLE Classification Improve Prognostic Value of the APACHE II Score in Critically Patients[J]. Int J Nephrol, 2013, 2013: 406165.
  • 6Santana - Cabrera L, Lorenzo - Torrent R, Sdnchez - Palacios M, et al. Influence of age in the duration of the stay and mortality of patients who remain in an Intensive Care Unit for a prolonged time [J]. Rev Clin Esp(Barc), 2014, 214(2): 74-78.
  • 7Dossett LA, Redhage LA, Sawyer RG, et al. Revisiting the validity of APACHE ]I in the trauma ICU : improved risk stratification in criti- cally injured adults[J]. Injury, 2009, 40(9) : 993 -998.
  • 8Zhang B, Wang A, Hu W, et al. Hemoconcentration caused by microvascular dysfunction after blast injuries to the chest and ab- domen of rabbits[J]. J Trauma, 2011,71(3) : 694 -701.
  • 9Silva Junior JM, Rezende E, Amendola CP, et al. Red blood cell transfusions worsen the outcomes even in critically ill patients un- dergoing a restrictive transfusion strategy[J]. Sao Pauln Med J, 2012, 130(2) : 77 -83.
  • 10Weinberg JA, Maclennan PA, Vandremme- Cusick MJ, et al. The deleterious effect of red blood cell storage on microvascular response to transfusion[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013,75 (5) : 807 -812.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部