摘要
在研究中国社会组织的特征方面,现存有结构性与能动性两种解释视角;两者虽然论点差异显著,却不约而同地混同了"独立性"与"自主性"概念。综合考察既有的理论成果,可知由单一的独立性、自主性概念难以生成对中国社会组织特征的较完备描述。基于结构与能动统一的理念,应用新制度理论晚近成就,可以发现中国社会组织之独特结构及实践,乃是组织对其所面对的"制度复杂性"的能动"回应";这种回应导致了中国社会组织独立性与自主性的复杂且多样组合,并在总体上呈现"依附式自主"特征。同时,从制度逻辑出发,对中国社会组织进行多层次制度分析,将形成关于中国社会组织依附式自主特征成因的系统描述,而且可能导出一种关于中国社会组织的新"研究纲领"。
There are two perspectives on the characteristics of Chinese social organizations: the structure perspective and the agency perspective. Although they show huge differences in arguments, both perspectives have confused 'independence' with 'autonomy.' A scrutiny of existing theoretical achievements reveals that neither 'independence' nor 'autonomy' alone can provide a complete description of the characteristics of Chinese social organizations. Based on an integrated idea of structure and agency and the late modern achievements of neoinstitutional theory, our study shows that the peculiar structure and practice of Chinese social organizations is an active 'response' of the organizations to 'institutional complexity'; this response has led to a complex and diverse combination of 'independence' and 'autonomy,' generally known as 'dependent autonomy.' Meanwhile, a multilevel institutional analysis of Chinese social organizations from the perspective of institutional logic will generate a systematic description of the causes for the dependent autonomy of Chinese social organizations, and may lead to a new 'research programme' of Chinese social organizations.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期50-66,205,共17页
Social Sciences in China
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"地方政府社会管理与社会自治的互动机制研究"(12BZZ045)
国家自然科学基金项目"非营利组织与企业跨部门合作的风险及其控制研究"(71173183)的阶段性成果
