期刊文献+

全髋关节与人工股骨头置换治疗股骨颈骨折90例疗效观察 被引量:9

Clinical effective between total hip arthroplasty and bipolar hemiarthroplasty arthroplasty on 90 cases of femoral neck fracture
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较全髋关节置换术(THA)与人工股骨头置换术(BHA)治疗股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法随机选择2011年5月至2012年5月我院收治的股骨颈骨折患者90例,按随机数字表将其分为两组,每组均为45例。THA组行全髋关节置换术治疗,BHA组行人工股骨头置换术。观察和比较两组的手术时间、出血量、住院时间、术后关节功能Harris评分、SF-36生活质量评分及不良反应。结果 THA组和BHA组髋关节Harris优良率分别达到82.22%和71.11%,THA组优良率显著高于BHA组(P<0.05);BHA组手术出血量、手术时间以及住院时间均低于THA组(P<0.05);THA组生活质量总评分(GH)为(78.90±6.04)分,高于BHA组的(73.02±5.32)分(P<0.05);THA组患者的再手术率为2.22%,BHA组为6.67%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论全髋关节置换术与人工股骨头置换术对股骨颈骨折疗效显著,但各有优缺点,应根据股骨颈骨折的具体情况选择相应的手术方法。 Objective To compare the clinical effective between total hip arthroplasty and bipolar hemiar- throplasty arthroplasty in 90 cases of femoral neck fracture. Methods Ninety patients with femoral neck fracture hos- pitalized in our hospital from May 2011 to May 2012 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, each with 45 cases, which were treated with total hip arthroplasty (the THA group) and bipolar hemiarthroplasty bipolar (the BHA group), respectively. The average operation time, the loss amount of blood, the length of hospital stay and the Harris score, SF-36 score and the rate of adverse reaction among two groups were compared and analyzed after treat- ment. Results The hip Harris excellent and good rate of the THA group and BHA group were 82.22% and 7 I. 11%, respectively. The excellent and good rate of the THA group was significantly higher than that in the BHA group (P〈 0.05). The volume of operation bleeding, the operation time and the length of hospital stay in the BHA group were all significantly lower than that of the THA group (P〈0.05). The score of quality life in the THA group was (78.90±6.04), significantly higher than that of the BHA group (73.02±5.32), P〈0.05. The reoperation rate in the THA group was 2.22%, significantly lower than that in the BHA group of 3.33% (P〈0.05). Conclusion Its has different advantages and disadvantages among bipolar hemiarthroplasty bipolar and total hip arthroplasty with traditional hollow compres- sion and screw internal fixation of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. The choices of operation method should be based on the specific circumstances of femoral neck fracture corresponding to the selected operation mode.
作者 张新宇
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2013年第9期1290-1292,共3页 Hainan Medical Journal
关键词 临床疗效 股骨颈骨折 全髋关节置换术 人工股骨头置换术 Clinical Effect Femoral neck fracture Total hip arthroplasty Bipolar hemiarthroplasty arthro- plasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献50

共引文献125

同被引文献78

  • 1张学斌,沈业彤,张子玉.全髋关节与人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨软骨折的疗效对比[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(6):1640-1641. 被引量:5
  • 2梅彰桢 宋宏.微创人工股骨头置换术治疗75岁以上股骨颈骨折体会.中国医药指南,2009,8(25):119-120.
  • 3Heintzbergen S, Kulin NA, Ijzerman MJ, et al. Cost-utility of met- al-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip re- placement in young active patients with osteoarthritis [J]. Value Health, 2013, 16(6): 942-952.
  • 4Park KS, Oh CS, Yoon TR. Comparison of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty versus conventional hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in active elderly patients [J]. Chonnam Med J, 2013, 49(2): 81-86.
  • 5Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Yukizawa Y, et al. Little clinical advantage of modified Watson-Jones approach over modified mini-incision di- rect lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Arthro- plasty, 2011, 26(7): 1117-1122.
  • 6Foucher KC, Wirnmer MA, Moisio KC, et al. Time course and ex- tent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasiv: total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches-a randomized controlled trial [J]. J Biomech, 2011, 44 (3): 372-378.
  • 7Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P, et al. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus me- diushemimyotomy [J]. Orthop Traumatol Stag Res, 2011, 97(1): 14-21.
  • 8Sandri A, Regis D, Magnan B, et al. Hip resurfacing using the an- terotateral Watson-Jones approach in the supine position [J]. Ortho- pedics, 2009, 32(6): 406.
  • 9Czerwiaski E, Borowy P, Kumorek A, et al.Fracture Risk Prediction in Outpatients from Krakow Region Using FRAX Tool Versus Fracture Risk in ll-year Follow-up[J].Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2013, 15(6): 617- 628.
  • 10Rajak M K, Jha R, Kumar P, et al.Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular femoral neck fractures in elderly patients[J].J Orthop Surg(HongKong), 2013, 21(3): 313-316.

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部