期刊文献+

不同直径预成氧化锆桩和纤维桩修复的抗折性比较 被引量:9

Fracture resistance of maxillary incisors restored with different diameters of prefabricated Zirconia and fiber post with core resin material
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察不同直径预成氧化锆桩和纤维桩与核树脂桩核冠修复上颌中切牙的抗折力。方法 24颗完整上中切牙根管充填后随机分为4组,分别采用直径1.5mm、1.35mm预成氧化锆桩和直径1.5mm、1.375mm预成纤维桩与核树脂加Ni-Cr合金铸造冠修复。对所有样本进行抗折实验,并对其断裂模式进行观察和分析。结果直径1.5mm、1.35mm预成氧化锆桩组抗折力为508.5±143.3N和434.9±141.7N,大于直径1.5mm、1.375mm的预成纤维桩组抗折力(292.2±54.5N,238.5±79.1N),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。预成氧化锆桩组样本的损坏模式为桩的断裂或合并根颈部的损伤,根颈部的损伤中50%为破坏性牙折;预成纤维桩组样本的损坏模式为桩的弯曲,根颈部的损伤中83.3%为可修复性牙折。结论预成氧化锆桩与核树脂桩核冠修复上颌中切牙可承受较高的载荷,预成纤维桩对预防破坏性根折有利。 Objective To investigate the fracture resistance of maxillary incisors restored with different diameters of prefabricated Zirconia and fiber post with core resin material. Methods Twenty-four isolated maxillary central incisors which had received root cannl treatment were divided into 4 groups, which were then restored with 1.5mm, 1.35mm diameters of Zirix post and 1.5mm, 1. 375mm diameters of fiber post, respectively. The fracture resistance of the samples was tested by universal test machine and the fracture modes were observed. Results The fracture resistance of 1.5ram and 1.35mm diameters of Zirix post was 508. 5 + 143.3N and 434. 9±141.7N,and of 1.5mm,1. 375mm diameters of fiber post was 292. 2 ±54. 5N and 238. 5 ±79. IN. There was a significant difference in resistance between prefabrieated Zirconia post and the fiber post ( P 〈 0. 05 ). 50% of the prefabricated Zirconia post samples fractured at the root cervical portion and 83. 3% of the fiber post samples fractured could be retreated. Conclusion Prefabricated Zireonia post could bear higher fracture load.
出处 《北京口腔医学》 CAS 2013年第2期89-91,共3页 Beijing Journal of Stomatology
基金 科研基地-科技创新平台(112227) 首都特色临床医学技术发展研究(Z090507017709002)
关键词 抗折力 预成氧化锆桩 预成纤维桩 Fracture resistance Prefabricated Zirconia post Prefabricated fiber post
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1苏兴宇,林致,张振庭,温颖.注射成型氧化锆陶瓷预成桩的抗折性能研究[J].北京口腔医学,2008,16(5):244-246. 被引量:5
  • 2Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson DL. Fracture resistance and primaryfailure mode of endondontically treated teeth restored with a carbonfiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont, 2001,14(2):141-145.
  • 3Isidor F,0dman P,Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restoredusing prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont, 1996,9(2):131-136.
  • 4Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, et al. Survival rate and fracturestrength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderatedefects restored with different post-and-core systems : An in vitrostudy. Int J Prosthodont,2001,14( 1) :58-64.
  • 5孙凤,钱端申,魏克立,黄凌,俞红.Cosmopost全瓷桩核的临床应用[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2003,38(6):470-472. 被引量:12
  • 6Heydecke C,Butz F,Hussein A,et al. Fracture strength after dynamicloading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent,2002,87(4) :438-445.
  • 7Toksavul S,Toman M,Uyulgan B, et al. Effect of luting agents andreconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre-fabricatedpostsystems. J Oral Rehabil,2005,32(6) :433-440.
  • 8Raadsheer MC,van Eijden TM,van Ginkel FC’et al. Contribution ofjaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite forcemagnitude. J Dent Res, 1999,78(1) :31-42.
  • 9刘鹏,李亚南,姜慧,邓旭亮,王新知.CAD/CAM一体化玻璃纤维桩核抗折力的体外实验研究[J].北京口腔医学,2010,18(2):90-93. 被引量:22
  • 10Hayashi M,Sugeta A,Takahashi Y,et al. Static and fatigue fractureresistance of pulpless teeth restorted with post-cores. Dent Mater,2008,24(9) :1178-1186.

二级参考文献23

  • 1马书意,房伯君.铸瓷桩核的临床应用效果观察[J].辽宁医学杂志,2004,18(6):320-320. 被引量:3
  • 2万乾炳,吕杰,贾燕,卢冬梅,廖运茂.全瓷桩核断裂强度的研究[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2005,36(2):264-266. 被引量:5
  • 3丁宁,牛景路,母瑞虹,赵谌.四种生物陶瓷材料的生物活性比较[J].北京口腔医学,2005,13(1):26-27. 被引量:10
  • 4Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials, 1999, 20( 1 ) : 1-25.
  • 5Hochman N, Zalkind M. New all-ceramic indirect post-and-core system. J Prosthet Dent, 1999, 81(5) : 625-629.
  • 6Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, et al. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zircania ceramic. Dent Mater, 1999, 15(6) : 426-433.
  • 7Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, et al. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endedontic post. Biomaterials, 2002, 23 ( 13 ) : 2667-2682.
  • 8Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent, 1999, 27(4) : 275-278.
  • 9彭娟红,刘学恒,彭东,王新知.纳米金刚石改性核树脂与纤维桩的微拉伸粘结强度研究[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2007,8(3):216-219. 被引量:5
  • 10Balkenhol M,W(o)stmann B,Rein C,et al.Survival time of cast post and cores:a 10-year retrospective study.J Dent,2007,35(1):50-58.

共引文献34

同被引文献127

  • 1刘国江,杨丽,冯剑桥.聚醚醚酮桩核在上颌中切牙修复时的三维有限元分析[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2022,56(6):580-583. 被引量:3
  • 2李磊,段明丽,陈树国.纤维/树脂复合材料桩钉系统研究进展[J].国外医学(口腔医学分册),2004,31(5):397-399. 被引量:30
  • 3彭林红.牙髓活力正常的前牙切角缺损修复方法探讨[J].医药论坛杂志,2006,27(9):50-51. 被引量:7
  • 4Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, et al. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on conebeam computed tomographs [ J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137 (4 Suppl) : S100- S108.
  • 5Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, et al. Preliminary into fiberpile in the application of oral cavity repair[ J 1. China Prac Med,2013,8 (1) :9-11.
  • 6Singh A, Logani A, Shah N. An ex vivo comparative study on the re- tention of custom and prefabricated posts [ J ]. J Conserv Dent,2012, 15(2) :183-186.
  • 7Mastoras K, Vasiliadis L, Koulaouzidou E, et al. Evaluation of push- out bond strength of two endodontic post systems [ J ]. J Endod,2012, 38(4) :510-514.
  • 8支敏,李长福,韦界飞,徐连来.纳米SiO_2在PMMA口腔义齿修复材料中的应用基础研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2007,13(4):493-496. 被引量:14
  • 9Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Effect of dowel spacepreparation and composite cement thickness on retention of aprefabricated dowel[ J]. J Prosthodont, 2002, 11(1) : 19-24.
  • 10Costa RG,De Morais EC, Campos EA, et al. Customized fiberglass posts. Fatigue and fracture resistance[ J] .Am J Dent, 2012,25(1) :35-38.

引证文献9

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部