摘要
对环境污染侵权,我国立法统一采取无过错责任原则,在理论上,无过错责任原则也取得了通说的地位。尽管如此,这种一元化的归责原则仍然受到了来自"过错责任说"和"综合责任说"的挑战。由于环境污染侵权中包含着各种复杂的因素,对这一领域的类型化分析远未展开,一元化的归责原则便极易导致对不同或不类似情形作出相同或相类似处理的结果。某些发达国家仅仅是在其环境污染侵权领域采取了无过错责任原则,但未将这一原则作为该领域唯一的归责原则。事实上,环境污染侵权领域包含着各种归责原则适用的可能性,并且各种归责原则在这一领域中并不存在有机联系。
Chinese legislation adopts the principle of liability without fault against environmental in- fringement. Though generally accepted in theory, the principle has been challenged by the proposal of liability with fault and that of comprehensive liability. Without detailed analyses of the complex fac- tors involved in environmental infringement, the unitary liability principle is liable for the same or similar treatment of different cases. In some developed countries, the principle of liability without fault is not the only principle in treating environmental infringement cases. Different principles be- tween which inherent relations may not necessarily be found can be applied in environmental infringe- ment.
出处
《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2013年第2期22-26,共5页
Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金项目(08BFX024)
江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2010SJB820018)
关键词
环境污染侵权
归责原则
无过错责任原则
environmental infringement
liability principle
the principle of liability without fault
