期刊文献+

Wingspan支架对症状性颅内椎基底动脉狭窄的治疗 被引量:1

Wingspan stent for treatment of symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析应用wingspan支架对症状性颅内椎基底动脉狭窄的治疗情况,评价其安全性及有效性。方法应用wingspan支架治疗症状性颅内椎基底动脉狭窄患者28例,观察其技术成功率、狭窄率的改变、围手术期并发症及术后症状改善情况。结果(1)28例患者共置入29枚wingspan支架,技术成功率100%。(2)术后即刻血管造影证实,狭窄率由(77.4±8.2)%降为(21.4±7.9)%。(3)2例(7.1%)患者出现围手术期并发症,考虑为穿支动脉闭塞。(4)28例患者术后随访6~21个月,按照malek评分,分别评价术后当时(24h内),术后1个月及最近时间预后情况,术后当时malek评分:1分26例(92.9%),4分2例(7.1%);1个月后评分:1分25例(89.3%),4分2例(7.1%),5分1例(3.6%)(术后2周死于肺部感染导致的呼吸衰竭)。最近随访术后6个月到21个月,平均(12.7±3.4)个月:1分24例(85.7%),3分1例(3.6%),5分2例(7.1%)(另一患者术后7个月死于脑出血),失访1例(3.6%)。结论应用wingspan支架治疗症状性颅内椎基底动脉具有较好的安全性及短期疗效,其长期疗效还需进一步随访。 Objective To retrospectively analyze the treatment of symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis with Wingspan stent and to evaluate the feasibility and safety. Methods 28 patients with symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis were treated by Wingspan stent-assisted angioplasty. Technical success rate,the degree of stenosis, periprocedural neurological complications and efficiency were observed. Results ( 1 )28 patients were implanted 29 Wingspan stents. The technical success rate was 100%. (2)The mean degree of stenosis decreased from (77.4+8.2)% before the procedure to (21.4+7.9)% after stenting.(3 )2 patients(7.1%) occurred periprocedural neurological complications caused by perforator strokes. (4)Follow-up (range,6-21months) was available for 28 patients. According to Malek scale, Neurological outcome was determined immediately after the procedure, at 30 days, and at latest follow-up. 26 patients (92.9%) belonged to scale 1, 2patients (7.1%)belonged to scale 4 after the procedure. At 30 days, 25patients (89.3%) belong to scale 1,2patients (7.1%)belonged to scale 4 and 1 patient (3.6%) belonged to scale 5 (died because of respiratory failure caused by pulmonary infection two weeks after procedure). At latest follow-up (range, 6-21months,mean, 12.7±3.4 months), 24 patients( 85.7% ) belonged to scale 1, 1 patient(3.6%) belonged to scale 3, 2 patients(7.1% ) belonged to scale 5(the second patient died because of cerebral hemorrhage 7 months after procedure), 1 patient(3.6% )lost follow-up. Conclusion Wingspan stent for treatment of symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis is safe and feasible in short-term. However, long-term efficacy needs further investigation.
出处 《中国城乡企业卫生》 2013年第2期16-21,共6页 Chinese Journal of Urban and Rural Enterprise Hygiene
关键词 wingspan支架 症状性颅内椎基底动脉狭窄 血管成形术 Wingspan stent Symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar arterial stenosis Angioplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1The Warfarin-Aspirin Sy,nptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) Study Group.Prognosis of patients with symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis[J].Stroke, 1998, 29(7) : 1389-1392.
  • 2HOPKINS LN, MARTIN NA, HADLEY MN, et al.Vertebrobasilar insufficiency:Part 2-Microsurgical treatment of intracranial verte-brobasilar disease[J].Neurosurg, 1987, 66:662-674.
  • 3MALEK AM, HIGASHIDA RT, PHATOUROS CC, et al.Treatment of posterior circulation ischemia with extracranial percutaneous balloon angioplasty and stent placement[J].Stroke, 1999, 30(10) : 2073-2085.
  • 4LEVY El, CHATURVEDI S.Perforator stroke following intracranial stenting: a sacrifice for the greater good[J].Neurology, 2006, 66: 1803 - 1804.
  • 5SLOBODAN MARINKOVIC, HIROHIKO GIBO.The surgical anatomy of the perforating branches of the basilar artery[J].Neurosurgery, 1993, 33(1): 80-87.
  • 6扈明侠.急性脑桥梗死48例分析[J].中国误诊学杂志,2008,8(18):4471-4472. 被引量:2
  • 7KJM DJ, LEE BH, KIM DI, et al.stent-assisted angioplasty of symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis:feasibility and follow-up results[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005, 26(6): 1381-1388.
  • 8LEVY El, HANEL RA, BOULOS AS, et al.Comparison of periprocednre complications resulting from direct stent placement compared with those due to conventional and staged stent placement in the basilar artery[J].J Neurosurg, 2003, 99(4):653-660.
  • 9JIANG WJ, SRIVASTAVA T, GAO F, et al.Perforator stroke after elective stenting of symptomatic intracranial stenosis [J].Neurology, 2006, 66(12): 1868-1872.
  • 10MASUO O, TERADA T, WALKER G, et al. Patency of perforating arteries after stent placement A study using as in Vivo experimental atherosclerosis-induced model [J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005, 26(3):543-548.

二级参考文献71

  • 1路玉江,晏培,史美娜.脑桥腔隙性梗死37例临床分析[J].临床神经病学杂志,2005,18(3):184-184. 被引量:2
  • 2何育生,王星,陈玉辉,孙跃喜,韩洪杰,黄冬雅.脑桥梗死的临床与神经影像学特征[J].中风与神经疾病杂志,2005,22(6):543-545. 被引量:8
  • 3黄清海,刘建民,洪波,许奕,赵瑞,陈军.药物洗脱支架治疗颅内动脉及颅外椎动脉狭窄[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2006,11(2):55-57. 被引量:21
  • 4习予祥,秦玉翰,冯树贵.脑桥腔隙性梗死的临床分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2006,9(4). 被引量:4
  • 5[1]Sundt TM Jr,Sandok BA,Whisnant JP.Carotid endarterectomy:complications and preoperative assessment of risk[J].Mayo Clin Proc,1975,50:301-306.
  • 6[2]Sundt TM Jr,Sharbrough FW,Piepgras DG,et al.Correlation of cerebral blood flow and electroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomy[J].Mayo Clin Proc,1981,56:533-543.
  • 7[3]Reigel MM,Hollier LH,Sundt TM Jr.Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome:a cause of neurologic dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy[J].J Vasc Surg,1987,5:628-634.
  • 8[4]Ascher E,Markevich N,Schutzer RW,et al.Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy:predictive factors and hemodynamic changes[J].J Vasc Surg,2003,37:769-777.
  • 9[5]Morrish W,Grahovac S,Douen A,et al.Intracranial hemorrhage after stenting and angioplasty of extracranial carotid stenosis[J].Am J Neuroradiol,2000,21:1911-1916.
  • 10[6]Meyer PM,Higashida RT,Phatouros CC,et al.Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after percutaneous transluminal stenting of the craniocervical arteries[J].Neurosurg,2000,47:335-343.

共引文献61

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部