期刊文献+

腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术与开腹手术的疗效比较 被引量:10

The Effective Comparison of Laparoscopic Gastric Ulcer Perforation Repair and Open Surgery
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:观察对比腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术与开腹手术两种不同手术方法的临床效果,以指导临床应用。方法:选择2010年1月-2012年1月在笔者所在医院行腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术患者36例(A组),另选择同期行开腹手术治疗的胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者32例(B组),对比分析两组的手术时间、住院时间、引流量、排气时间、术后并发症。结果:两组手术时间、排气时间、住院时间对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术中、术后不同时间引流量对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后B组发生腹腔脓肿2例,粘连性肠梗阻1例,A组无一例中转开腹,术后无一例发生切口感染、粘连性梗阻及腹腔内感染。结论:腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术的手术效果明显优于开腹手术,值得广泛推广和应用。 Objective: To observe and contrast the efficacy of laparoscopic gastric ulcer perforation repair and open surgery, in order to guide the clinical application.Methods: From January 2010 to January 2012 in our hospital laparoscopic gastric ulcer perforation repair in 36 patients (A group), and other select underwent iaparotomy gastric ulcer perforation in 32 patients (B group), the operative time, hospital stay, drainage, exhaust time, post-operative complications were analysed in two groups.Results: The operative time, exhaust time, hospital stay time in A group were less than B group, the difference was statistically significant(P〈O.05), the difference about intraoperative and postoperative drainage volume were statistically significant in both groups(P〈O.OS).There were two cases of abdominal abscess and one cases of intestinal obstruction in B group.There were no case for laparotomy and no case of postoperative wound infection, adhesions obstruction and intra-abdominal infections in A group.Conclusion: Laparoscopic gastric ulcer perforation repair effect of surgery is superior to open surgery, should he popularized and applied.
作者 王先国
机构地区 兴安两江医院
出处 《中外医学研究》 2013年第12期16-17,共2页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词 腹腔镜手术 胃十二指肠急性穿孔 开腹手术 引流量 Laparoscopic surgery Acute gastroduodenal perforation Laparotomy Drainage volume
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1翁伟建,林孝和,李新华,贾保全,曹农,杨伟林.腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补的探讨[J].局解手术学杂志,2004,13(6):378-379. 被引量:10
  • 2向国安,陈开运,高鹏,刘灏,肖方联,劳炜东,谭敏.腹腔镜在急腹症中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(8):651-652. 被引量:35
  • 3许建平,范德标,林海军,董方林.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗124例消化性溃疡急性穿孔的对比研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2006,11(1):28-29. 被引量:30
  • 4Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2004,18 ( 7 ) : 1013-1021.
  • 5Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique [ J ]. Ann Surg, 1996,224 ( 2 ) : 131-138.
  • 6Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer : a randomized controlled trial [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2002,235(3) :313-319.
  • 7Lorand I, Molinier N, Sales JP, et al. Results of laparoscopic treatment of perforated ulcers [ J ]. Chirurgie, 1999,124 ( 2 ) : 149- 153.
  • 8Tsumura H, Ichikawa T, Hiyama E, et al. Laparoscopic and open approach in perforated peptic ulcer[ J ]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2004,51 (59) : 1536-1539.
  • 9Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, et al. Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2004,91 (4) : 481-484.
  • 10吴盂超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:2105.

共引文献197

同被引文献88

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部