摘要
随着互联网市场的发展,我国司法实践中适用的判断经营者市场支配地位的方案受到了严峻挑战。在互联网市场上,市场份额的计算方法受到质疑,市场份额对衡量经营者市场竞争力的判断作用已经退化。在我国对市场份额证据严格限制的实证法背景下,我国司法实践中推行的"单一市场结构方案"既不能适用于互联网市场中的垄断行为规制,也不符合我国反垄断的立法规定,是必须摈弃的一种落后观念。因应互联网市场的形成,根据我国《反垄断法》的立法宗旨和基本精神,应当在反垄断司法实践中贯彻"综合标准方案",既不简单反对可以根据市场份额推定经营者的市场支配地位,又充分考虑市场进入壁垒、市场竞争状况等其他因素对经营者市场支配地位的影响。
With rapid development of internet market,identification of businesses＇ dominant position in judicial practice is now faced with serious challenges.The calculation method of market shares has been questioned,and the function of market shares to market power is degraded in internet market.In the context of strictly limiting evidence of market shares,the ＂single-market-structural approach＂ adopted in China＇s judicial practice can neither regulate internet market monopoly nor comply with anti-monopoly legislation,revealing an outdated concept that must be got rid of.We should,taking into account formation of internet market,legislative purpose and basic spirit of antitrust law,implement the ＂comprehensive-standard approach＂ in antitrust practice,which means that presumption of dominant position based on market shares shall not be frivolously opposed of and the impact of barriers to market access,competition and other factors upon businesses＇ dominant position be fully considered.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第2期93-101,共9页
Modern Law Science
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"网络环境下个人信息安全危机与法律规制对策研究"(12XFX021)
中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目"互联网企业滥用市场支配地位的法律规制研究"(CDJXS12080002)
关键词
市场份额
市场支配地位
单一市场结构方案
综合标准方案
market share
dominant position
single structural approach
comprehensive standard approach
