期刊文献+

我国部属高校科技活动综合评价——基于PLS路径模型的实证研究 被引量:13

Comprehensive Evaluation on the Performance of S&T Activities in Universities Subordinated to the Ministry of Education——An Empirical Study Based on the PLS Path Model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文运用PLS路径模型这一多指标综合评价方法综合评价高校科技活动.以我国60所部属高校科技活动为例,设计了相应的综合评价指标体系,采用PLS模型方法构建了我国部属高校科技活动综合评价模型.运用2007年的数据对我国部属高校的科技活动进行综合评价,并对所测算的综合评价指数进行了聚类分析.研究结果表明,科研活动和社会效益等指标因素对我国部属高校科技活动综合能力影响最大.各高校应根据评价综合得分和排名,辨识自身的相对优势和不足,采取措施提高科技活动综合能力. The partial least square (PLS) method is a muhi-index synthetic evaluation method. Here it uses PLS meth- od to make a comprehensive evaluation of university S&T activities. It designs a corresponding comprehensive evaluation index system to evaluate the S&T activities in 60 universities subordinated to the Ministry of Education, and applies the PLS method to the comprehensive evaluation model. It uses the data in 2007 to conduct a cluster analysis based on the result of synthetic evaluation index. The results indicate that indices of scientific research activities and social benefits have the greatest influences on comprehensive ability of the universities. Universities should recognize its relative strength and weakness through scores and rankings, and take corresponding measures to increase its comprehensive ability of S&T activies.
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期95-106,共12页 R&D Management
基金 山东省软科学基金资助项目"山东省地区工业知识生产效率测算实证研究"(2010RKGA1029) 山东省政府"泰山学者"建设工程专项经费资助项目
关键词 高校科技活动 综合评价指数 PLS路径模型 S&T activities in universities comprehensive evaluation index PLS path model
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献41

  • 1王惠文,付凌晖.PLS路径模型在建立综合评价指数中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(10):80-85. 被引量:54
  • 2王重鸣,陈民科.管理胜任力特征分析:结构方程模型检验[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):513-516. 被引量:522
  • 3钱璐,郑少智.基于AHP方法的我国保险公司核心竞争力的综合评价[J].统计与决策,2005,21(05S):37-38. 被引量:14
  • 4刘杰,吕占峰,赵礼曼.湖北高校科技创新能力分析与评价[J].理论月刊,2006(8):79-81. 被引量:14
  • 5Frame,J.Modeling national technological capacity with patent indicators[J].Scienometries,1991,22(3):327-339
  • 6Saaty,T.L.,Vargas,L.G.Decision making in economic,political,social and technological environments with the analytic hierarchy process[M].Pittsburgh:RWS Publications,1994
  • 7Gary,H.,Heene,A.,et al.Competence-based competition[M].New York:John Wiley & Sons Ltd.,1994
  • 8中华人民共和国科技部.科学技术评价办法(试行)[EB/OL] .http:/most.gov.cn.
  • 9GUINOT C, LATREILLE J, TENENHAUS M. PLS Path modeling and multiple table analysis. Application to the cosmetic habits of women in Ile-de-France [J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2001 (58): 247-259.
  • 10STUFFLEBEAM, D. L. The CIPP model for evaluation[ A ]. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghaneds. Evaluation models: Viewpoint on educational and human services evaluation (2nd. Ed) [ C ] .Holand: Kluwer Academic Publishers,2000: 279-317.

共引文献383

同被引文献182

引证文献13

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部