期刊文献+

氩绿激光治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞的临床疗效 被引量:4

Clinical curative effect of argon chloride laser in treating retinal branch vein occlusion
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨氩绿激光治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞的临床疗效。方法:经眼底荧光血管造影(FFA)确诊为视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)患者60例60眼。患者随机分两组:A组(治疗组)使用氩绿视网膜光凝治疗30例;B例(对照组)口服活血化瘀药物(复方血栓通胶囊)治疗30例;两组患者随访时间为治疗后1,3,6,12mo,随访内容为视力、FFA检查及眼底情况,对治疗6mo后视力恢复结果和黄斑水肿消退情况进行对比。结果:A组:显效8例,有效20例,无效2例。B组:显效2例,有效14例,无效14例。A组合并黄斑囊样水肿者14例,给予氩绿视网膜光凝治疗后黄斑水肿消退12例,未消退2例;B组合并黄斑囊样水肿者13例,药物治疗后黄斑水肿消退3例,未消退10例,经卡方检验,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:氩绿激光对视网膜分支静脉阻塞的激光治疗有显著疗效,激光治疗组治疗后6mo病情稳定,效果好。 AIM : To study the clinical curative effect argon chlorine laser treatment in branch retinal vein occlusion(BRVO) . METHODS :The 60 BRVO patients clinically confirmed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A (treatment group) 30 cases underwent argon chlorine laser photocoagulation ; group B (control group)30 cases were for activating blood circulation and eliminating stasis drugs (compound thrombosis the capsule) ). The results of visual acuity and macula edema regression in the two groups 6 months after treatment were compared. RESULTS: Group A: obviously effective in 8 cases, effective 20 cases. Group B: obviously effective in 2 cases, effective in 14 cases, invalid in 14 cases; Group A had 14 cases combined with macular edema, and after argon chlorine retinal photocoagulation, macular edema disappeared in 12 cases, not retreat in 2 cases; Group B had 13 cases combined with macular edema, and macular edema disappeared after medical treatment in 3 cases, not disappeared in 10 cases. CONCLUSION:The argon laser photocoagulation is an effective treatment for BRVO, promote the visual acuity, shorten the duration of symptoms.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2013年第4期796-798,共3页 International Eye Science
关键词 视网膜分支静脉阻塞 氩绿视网膜光凝 疗效 branch retinal vein occlusion argon chlorine retinal photocoagulation curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Azad R, Vivek K, Sharma Y, et al. Ranibizumab as an adjunct to laser for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Indian J Ophthalrnol 2012 ;60 (4) :263-266.
  • 2Gundogan FC, Tas A, Sobaci G. A comparative study between intravitreal triamcinolone and bevacizumab for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion with poor vision. Indian J Ophthalmol 2012 ;60(4) :339-340.
  • 3Noma H, Funatsu H, Mimura T, et al. Perifoveal Microcirculation in Macular Oedema with Retinal Vein Occlusion. Open Ophthalmol J 2012 ;6:63-64.
  • 4Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB, Podhajsky P. Hematologic abnormalities associated with various types of retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002 ;240 ( 3 ) : 180-196.
  • 5Duster YK. The rationale of argon laser photocoagulation for diabetic maculapthy. J Postgrad Med 1994 ;40 : 13 - 17.
  • 6张红,高维奇,张小平,刘平,张雨春.氩激光光凝治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2002,20(4):271-273. 被引量:5
  • 7邹绚,戴荣平,董方田.视网膜分支静脉阻塞伴黄斑囊样水肿患者的光感受器细胞层变化与视力之间关系的初步探讨[J].中华眼科杂志,2010,46(11):1006-1010. 被引量:13
  • 8Yilmaz T, Cordero-Coma M. Use of bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012 ;250 ( 6 ) :787-793.
  • 9戴成华.激光治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞疗效分析[J].国际眼科杂志,2008,8(11):2330-2331. 被引量:5

二级参考文献27

共引文献19

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部