期刊文献+

躯体形式障碍伴发抑郁的影响因素 被引量:3

Influencing factors correlated with depression in somatoform disorders
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨躯体形式障碍(SFD)伴发抑郁的影响因素。方法采用自编的躯体症状报告单、Beck抑郁自评问卷(BDI)、认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ—c)、多伦多述情量表(TAS)对115例SFD患者进行评定。结果纳入研究的109例SFD中,69例(SFD抑郁组)BDI总分≥14分,40例(SFD非抑郁组)BDI总分≤13分。SFD抑郁组CERQ—C不适应性策略总分[(46.83±7.58)比(41.35±9.32)]、TAS总分[(61.55±7.05)比(55.20±9.84)]均高于非抑郁组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。SFD抑郁组的认知功能、运动系统、疼痛、泌尿生殖系统症状及症状清单总分[(26.38±6.80)比(22.35±6.30)]显著高于非抑郁组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。以是否抑郁为因变量,对有关变量进行Logistic回归分析,CERQ—C不适应性策略总分、性别、受教育年限依次进入方程。结论SFD伴发抑郁较为常见,SFD抑郁组较非抑郁组存在更为严重的述情障碍与躯体化症状。SFD抑郁的发生与不适应性策略、性别及受教育年限等密切相关。 Objective To investigate the influencing factors correlated with depression in somato- form disorders (SFD). Methods A total of 115 SFD patients were assessed with a self--designed self-- rating somatic symptom questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Chinese version of Cogni- tive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ--C) and the twenty--item Toronto Scale (TAS). Results In 109 SFD completed the study, 69 patients (the SFD group with depression)had total BDI score over 14,and 40(the SFD group without depression)had total BDI score under 13. Compared with the SFD group without depression, the SFD group with depression showed significant higher total score of CERQ --C maladaptive strategies [-(46.83±7.58)vs ( 41. 35±9.32)1 and TAS[(61.55±7.05)vs (55.20± 9.84)] (P 〈 0.01). In somatic symptom questionnaire, SFD with depressive mood had significant higher score in cognitive function, locomotor system, pain, urinary and reproductive system and total score of somatic symptom questionnaire [-(26. 38±6. 80) vs ( 22. 35 ± 6. 30)1 than those without depressive mood (P 〈0.05). Logistic regression showed that total score of CERQ--C maladaptive strategies, gender and education years entered sequentially the regression equation for total score of BDI in SFD. Conclusions Depressive disorder are very common in SFD. SFD with depressive mood show more severe alexithymia and somatic symptoms than those without depressive mood. The maladaptive strategies, gender and education years are responsible for the depression severity in SFD.
出处 《神经疾病与精神卫生》 2013年第1期36-39,共4页 Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
基金 基金项目:济宁市医药卫生科技项目(200937)
关键词 躯体形式障碍 抑郁 认知应对 述情障碍 Somatoform disorders Depression Cognitive coping Alexithymia
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献86

  • 1刘玉局.躯体化障碍城乡患者临床对照分析[J].临床精神医学杂志,2005,15(5):295-295. 被引量:2
  • 2位照国,王希林,孙旭坤,李涛,康岚,王雪琴.综合医院住院病人躯体形式障碍的临床特点[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(3):183-185. 被引量:37
  • 3李瑞,陈力,张聪沛,俞伟珍,艾霞.躯体形式障碍患者明尼苏达多相个性调查问卷模式分析[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(6):521-523. 被引量:22
  • 4朱熊兆,罗伏生,姚树桥,Randy P.Auerbach,JohnR.Z.Abela.认知情绪调节问卷中文版(CERQ-C)的信效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(2):121-124. 被引量:309
  • 5[1]Sifneos PE. The prevalence of alexithymic characteristics in psychosomatic patients. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics. 1973,22:255~262.
  • 6[2]Taylor GJ, Bagby RM, Parker JDA. Disorder of affect regulation. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 7[4]Bagby RM, Parker JDA, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994,38:23~32.
  • 8[5]Simonsson-Sarnecki M, Lundh LG, Bagby RM. A Swedish translation of 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale:Cross-validation of the factor structure. Scandinavian Journal of psychology. 2000,41:25~30.
  • 9[6]Powers DE.Coaching for the SAT: Summary for the summaries and update. Educational Measurement. 1993,12(2):24~39.
  • 10[7]Taylor GJ, Ryan D, Bagby RM. Taward the development of a new self-report alexithymia scale. Psychother Psychosom 1985,44:191~199.

共引文献1581

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部