摘要
社会工作介入汶川地震灾后重建,形成政府主导、社会组织主导、高校主导的三种模式,这三种模式各有优缺点。汶川地震灾后重建,出现重社区公共基础设施建设,轻社会服务、轻社区文化与精神建设的现象。社会工作介入灾后重建,也存在一些问题,如社会工作没纳入救灾体系,缺乏制度性建设;社会工作社会认知度不高,缺乏合法性;社会工作服务无固定经费来源,缺乏保障性;社会工作服务基本靠外来援助,缺乏长期性;社会工作无统一服务标准,缺乏规范性;社会工作服务注重预防与恢复,缺乏发展性等。通过我国灾害社会工作的实践探索,已初步形成可以操作的一定模式,这一行之有效的模式应该是:以政府为主导、以民办社工机构为服务主体、以社区能力建设为主要内容的灾后重建社会工作服务体系。
There are three kinds of invervention mode of social work in Wenchuan post-disaster reconstruction: the government leading mode,the social organization leading mode and the college leading mode.They all have its advantages and disadvantages.In the process of post-disaster reconstruction,great impor tance has been attached to the construction of community public infrastructure,while the construction of social service system,community culture and spiritual atmosphere has been neglected.There are also some problems in the process of intervention of social work.First of all,since social work is not included in the disaster relief system,it lacks systematic construction; secondly,due to the low social recognition and the lack of stable sources of funds,the services provided by social work could not last and have a dependence on foreign aid; what’s more,social work pays more attention to the prevention of and the recov ery from disaster than a systematic and standardized management of disaster.We believe that through the practice of disaster social work,a certain operational mode could be formed.And this effective mode should be a social work service system for post-disaster reconstruction with community capacity building as the main contents,the government as the leading role,and the private social work organization as the main provider of service.
出处
《社会工作》
2013年第1期56-64,152-153,共9页
Journal of Social Work
