期刊文献+

基于纳什谈判的供应商-销售商联合促销线性合约设计 被引量:33

Linear contract design for supplier-retailer joint promotion based on Nash bargaining
原文传递
导出
摘要 在供应链联合促销中,双边道德风险的存在使得供应商和销售商双方都有强烈的"搭便车"激励,而合理的利益分配对促进合作双方积极投入具有重要作用.运用纳什谈判解,构造了供应链联合促销的相互激励模型,并考察了最优线性合约的存在性.研究表明:在合作能产生净剩余的条件下,存在最优的批发价格使渠道收益达到极大;尽管谈判能力对最优批发价格没有影响,但合作收益在双方之间的分配却依赖于各自具有的谈判能力.研究指出:各方分得的合作剩余与自身的谈判能力成正比,与对方的谈判能力成反比. In joint sale promotion of supply chains, the supplier and retailer have a strong incentive of "free riding" due to double moral hazard. It is helpful of the reasonable profit sharing rule to promote active inputs of both parties. By means of Nash bargaining concept, it established mutually incentive model and investigated existence of the optimal linear contract for supply chains joint promotion. It shows that the optimal wholesale price exists on the condition of existence of net cooperative residual and the bargaining powers, on which the allocation of net residual depends, have no impact on the optimal wholesale price. What's more, it points out that the ratio of net cooperative residuals acquired by the two parties is in proportion to the ratio of bargaining power factors.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期870-877,共8页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目(08AJY028) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJC790279)
关键词 联合促销 纳什谈判 双边道德风险 线性合约设计 joint promotion Nash bargaining double moral hazard linear contract design
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Chu W, Desai P. Channel coordination mechanisms for customer satisfaction[J]. Marketing Science, 1995, 14(4): 343-359.
  • 2Jap S D, Manolis C, Weitz B A. Relationship quality and buyer-seller interactions in channels of distribution[J]. Journal of Business Research, 1999, 46(3): 303-313.
  • 3Jeuland A P, Shugan S M. Managing channel profits[J]. Marketing Science, 1983, 2(3): 239-272.
  • 4Anderson E, Coughlan A. International market entry and expansion via independent or integrated channels of distribution[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1987, 51(1): 71 82.
  • 5潘会平,陈荣秋.供应链合作的利润分配机制研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(6):87-93. 被引量:109
  • 6徐庆,朱道立,李善良.不对称信息下供应链最优激励契约的设计[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(4):27-33. 被引量:41
  • 7Gan X H, Sethi S P, Zhou J. Commitment-penalty contracts in drop-shipping supply chains with asymmetric demand information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 204(3): 449-462.
  • 8Cooper R, Ross T W. Product warranties and double moral hazard[J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1985, 16(1): 103 113.
  • 9Reid J D. The theory of share tenancy revisited-again[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1977, 85(2): 403-407.
  • 10Rubin P H. The theory of the firm and the structure of the franchise contract[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1978, 21(1): 223-233.

二级参考文献121

共引文献246

同被引文献419

引证文献33

二级引证文献282

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部