期刊文献+

咽喉表面麻醉慢诱导气管内插管在老年病人麻醉中的应用研究

The application study of throat surface anesthesia slow induction endotracheal intubation on elderly patients anesthesia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察咽喉表面麻醉慢诱导气管内插管对老年患者的影响。方法 66例择期行上腹部手术患者,随机分为咽喉表面麻醉慢诱导气管内插管组(观察组)和快速诱导插管组(对照组),每组各33例,观察两组诱导前(T0)及诱导后(T1)、插管即刻(T2)、插管后5min(T3)的平均动脉压和心率、镇痛效果和不良反应。结果与T0比较,观察组诱导开始后各时点MAP、HR处于平稳状态,无显著性差异;与T0比较,对照组T1时MAP明显下降(P<0.05);T2、T3时MAP、HR皆明显上升并持续(P<0.05);与观察组比较,对照组T2、T3的MAP、HR均显著增高(P<0.05);观察组在插管期间1例出现心动过缓,对照组3例出现室性早搏;观察组病人可较好地耐受气管导管。结论咽喉表面麻醉慢诱导气管内插管对老年人更安全。 Objective To observe the surface anesthetic throat slow induction endotracheal intubation effects in elderly patients. Methods 66 cases of option forward line in patients with abdominal surgery were randomly divided into throat surface anesthesia slow induction endotracheal intubation group (observation group) and rapid induction intubation group (control group), each group of 33 cases, the changes of mean arterial pressure, heart rate, analgesic effect, adverse effect and before (TO)and after inducing (T 1 ), Intubation immediate (T2), 5 mins after windpipe intubation after windpipe intubation (T3) were observed. Results Comparison with TO, the MAP and HR of observation group were plateau after the start of induction each time, there was no significant difference; comparison with TO, the MAP of control group declined obviously at T1 (P〈0.05), MAP and HR of control group were significantly higher at T2, T3 (P 〈 0.05 ) ; comparison with observation group, the MAP and HR of control group were significantly higher at T2, T3 (P 〈 0.05 ) ; there was l case with bradycardia of observation group during intubation; there was 3 cases ventricular premature beat of control group; the patient of the observation group can better withstand the endotracheal tube. Conclusion Throat surface anesthesia slow induction endotracheal tube for the elderly are more safety.
作者 张才勇
出处 《中国卫生产业》 2013年第4期15-16,共2页 China Health Industry
关键词 咽喉表面麻醉 插管 老年 气管 Throat surface anesthesia Intubation tube Agedness Trachea
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献43

  • 1朱昭琼,李晓霞,邓硕曾,刘进.雷米芬太尼在麻醉诱导中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(7):488-490. 被引量:55
  • 2谢言虎,方才.瑞芬太尼的临床应用现状[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2005,26(5):298-300. 被引量:108
  • 3庄雪珍.两种插胃管方法的比较[J].实用护理杂志,1996,12(12):532-533. 被引量:46
  • 4石尚英 郭建萍.按摩耳穴插胃管效果好[J].山西护理杂志,1995,9(5):224-224.
  • 5周伟琴 练正梅.氟哌利多与地卡因在插胃管中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2001,16(1):16-16.
  • 6Moraca RJ, Sheldon DG, Thirlby RC. The role of epidural anaesthe- siaand analgesia in surgical practice[ J]. Ann Surg, 2003, 238 (5) : 663-673.
  • 7武汉大学第一附属医院.耳鼻喉学[M],北京:人民卫生出版社,1988:80—82.
  • 8郭素珍.饮水插管法的体会[J].福建医药杂志,1999,21(1):113-115.
  • 9Salihoglu Z, Demiroluk S, Demirkiran O, et al. Comparison of effects of remifentanil ,alfentanil and fentanyl on cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2002, 19(2):125 - 128.
  • 10Hwan S , William J, Sasam E. Sevoflurane with remifentanil allow rapid tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blocking agents. Can J Anaesth,2001,48(7) :646 -650.

共引文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部