期刊文献+

头孢西丁钠治疗老年下呼吸道感染的临床对照研究 被引量:14

Controlled Clinical Research of Cefoxitin Sodium in the Treatment of Senile Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察头孢西丁钠治疗老年下呼吸道感染的疗效和安全性。方法按照计算机随机法将112例老年下呼吸道感染患者分为观察组和对照组,各56例。在常规对症治疗的基础上对照组采用左氧氟沙星注射液进行抗菌治疗,观察组采用头孢西丁钠治疗。比较两组患者治疗1,3,7 d后C反应蛋白水平,以及体温恢复正常时间、用药时间、平均治疗费用、药物不良反应发生率。结果治疗3,7 d后观察组患者C反应蛋白水平分别为(15.85±3.34)mg/L和(11.57±1.22)mg/L,对照组分别为(26.74±3.66)mg/L和(17.42±2.41)mg/L。观察组较对照组的体温恢复正常时间、抗菌药物应用时间明显缩短,治疗费用和不良反应发生率下降。结论头孢西丁钠治疗老年下呼吸道感染不良反应轻微可控,疗效良好,可作为常规用药。 Objective To study the application value and safety of cefoxitin sodium in the treatment of senile lower respiratory tract in- fection. Methods According to the computer random method will be 112 elderly cases of lower respiratory tract infection were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each 56 eases. The comparison group USES the levofloxacin for antimicrobial treatment, observation group the cefoxitin sodium treatment, compared between the two groups patients 1, 3, 7 d after C- reactive protein level, patients the body temperature to restore normal time, use time, average treatment costs, adverse drug reaction rate. Results Treatment 3, 7 d observation after patients C -reactive protein level were (15.85±3.34 )mg/L, (11.57 ± 1.22)mg/L, and the control group were (26.74 ± 3.66)rag/L, (17.42 ±2.41)mg/L. The observation group patients body temperature restored to normal time, antibiotics application time significantly shortened, the treatment cost and adverse reaction rate dropped with statistical difference. Conclusion Cefoxitin sodium for senile lower respiratory tract infection adverse reaction slight controllable, the treatment effect is good, and can be used for conventional medicine.
出处 《中国药业》 CAS 2013年第5期19-20,共2页 China Pharmaceuticals
关键词 头孢西丁钠 左氧氟沙星 老年下呼吸道感染 cefoxitin sodium levofloxacin lower respiratory tract infection in old people
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献8

共引文献29

同被引文献81

  • 1曾耀彬.头孢吡肟与氧氟沙星治疗老人支气管肺炎的疗效比较[J].中国卫生产业,2013,10(2):25-26. 被引量:2
  • 2国家药典委员会.中国药典:2005版二部[M]北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
  • 3Bellows CF, Mills KT, Kelly TN, etal. Combination of oral non-absorbable and intravenous antibiotics versus intravenous antibiotics alone in the prevention of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized con- trolled trialsEJ3. Tech Coloproctol, 2011,15 (4) : 385-395.
  • 4Itani KMF, Hawn MT. Prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery[J]. Colorec Can,2013,2(5):467-475.
  • 5Ho VP, Barie PS, Stein SL, et al. Antibiotic regimen and the timing of prophylaxis are important for reducing surgical site infection after elective abdominal colorectal surgery[J]. Surg infect,2011,12(4) :255-260.
  • 6Mahajan SN, Ariza-Heredia EJ, Rolston KV,etal. Perioper- ative antimicrobial prophylaxis for intra-abdominal surgery in patients with cancer: a retrospective study comparing ertap- enem and nonertapenem antibiotics[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2014,21(2) :513-519.
  • 7Hourigan JS. Impact of obesity on surgical site infection in co- lon and rectal surgery[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2011,24 (4) :283-290.
  • 8史西营.阿奇霉素与左氧氟沙星治疗老年支气管肺炎的疗效比较[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2013,21(2):118-120.
  • 9李卫娜,陈会娟,赵冠楠.氨曲南和头孢西丁钠治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效对比分析[J].医学信息,2015,28(13):175-176.
  • 10阮婷,叶辛幸.头孢西丁钠、头孢呋辛和头孢他定在治疗社区获得性肺炎中的临床评价[J].中国医院药学杂志,2010,30(2):151-153. 被引量:16

引证文献14

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部