期刊文献+

基于元建模的裂缝性气藏累计产量预测 被引量:2

Prediction of accumulated outflow from a fractured hydrocarbon reservoir using metamodeling
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了预测某裂缝性气藏在18年规划周期内的累计产量,建立了3种元模型,并结合数值模拟累计产量预测结果对各模型进行了验证和对比。估算了气藏的基本参数(孔隙度、渗透率及含水饱和度)并对气藏进行了数值模拟。将气藏内某井18年内的累计产量表示为各气藏参数的函数,采用储量计算经验函数排除了研究空间内的低潜力点,并基于最大熵准则选取25个高潜力点作为设计点。建立了二次模型、乘性模型和RBF模型3种元模型,基于各模型预测了25个设计点和7个试验点处的累计产量。预测结果表明:各模型均能比较准确地预测累计产量;RBF模型的累计产量预测准确性优于另外2种模型;与数值模拟方法相比,元建模方法的计算时间大幅缩短。 Three metamodels were established for predicting accumulated outflow from a fractured hydrocarbon reservoir over a planning horizon of 18 years, and the models were validated and compared using accumulated outflow predicted by numerical simulation The reservoir was simulated and its basic parameters (porosity, permeability and water saturation) were estimated. The accumulated outflow over 18 years of a well in the reservoir was expressed as a function of the reservoir parameters. Low potential points were excluded using HIP (Hydrocarbon in Place) equation and 25 high potential points were chosen as design points using maximum entropy design. Three kinds of metamodels (quadratic model, multiplicative model and radial basis function model) were built and the accumulated outflows of 25 design points and 7 test points were predicted based on the models. The prediction results show that all of the three models can accurately predict the accumulated outflow of the reservoir studied in this paper and the radial basis function model outperforms the other two metamodels. Besides, the calculating time of the metamodeling method is much less than that of the numerical simulation.
出处 《石油勘探与开发》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期215-219,共5页 Petroleum Exploration and Development
关键词 元建模 径向基函数 裂缝性气藏 产量预测 metamodeling radial basis function fractured hydrocarbon reservoir outflow prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Giiyagiiler B. Optimization of well placement and assessment of uncertainty[D]. Stanford: Stanford University, 2002.
  • 2庞伟,陈德春,张仲平,姜立富,李昌恒,赵旭,王冰.非均质油藏水平井分段变密度射孔优化模型[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):214-221. 被引量:28
  • 3Yeten B, Durlofsky L J, Aziz K. Optimization of nonconventional well type, location and trajectory[R]. SPE 77565, 2002.
  • 4Foroud T, Seifi A, Hassani H. Surrogate-based optimization of horizontal well placement in a mature oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2012, 30( 11 ): 1091-1101.
  • 5Mohammadi H, Seifi A, Foroud T. A robust Kriging model for predicting accumulative outflow from a mature reservoir considering a new horizontal well[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2012, 82/83:113-119.
  • 6何东博,王丽娟,冀光,位云生,贾成业.苏里格致密砂岩气田开发井距优化[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(4):458-464. 被引量:62
  • 7Etminan A H, Seifi A. An improved model for gcostatistical simulation of fracture parameters and their effect on static and dynamic models[J]. The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal, 2008, 1: 47-57.
  • 8Mckay M D, Beckman R J, Conover W J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code[J]. Technometrics, 2000, 42( 1 ): 55-61.
  • 9Sacks J, Welch W, Mitchell T, et al. Design and analysis of computer experinaents (with discussion)[J]. Statist Sci, 1989, 4(4): 409-423.
  • 10Ko C W, Lee J, Queyranne M. An exact algorithm for maximum entropy sampling[J]. Operations Research, 1995, 43(4): 684-691.

二级参考文献33

  • 1曲德斌,葛家理,王德民,周萍.水平井开发基础理论─—物理模型研究[J].石油学报,1994,15(4):49-57. 被引量:20
  • 2汪志明,徐静,王小秋,王海平.水平井两相流变密度射孔模型研究[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(3):65-69. 被引量:23
  • 3Beggs H D,Brill J P.A study of two-phase flow in inclined pipes[R].SPE4007-PA,1973.
  • 4Su Z,Gudmundsson J S.Pressure drop in perforated pipes:experiments and analysis[R].SPE28800,1994.
  • 5Haaland S E.Simple and explicit formulas for the friction factor in turbulent pipe flow[J].Journal of Fluids Engineering,1983,105(1):89-90.
  • 6Dikken B J.Pressure drop in horizontal wells and its effects on production performance[R].SPE19824-PA,1990.
  • 7Landman M J,Goldthorpe W H.Optimization of perforation distribution for horizontal wells[R].SPE23005-MS,1991.
  • 8Yuan H,Saric C,Brill J P.Effect of perforation density on single phase liquid flow behavior in horizontal wells[R].SPE37109-MS,1996.
  • 9Retnanto A,Economides M J,Ehlig-Economides C A,et a1.Optimization of the performance of partially completed horizontal wells[R].SPE37492,1997.
  • 10Furui K J,Zhu D,Hill A D,et al.Optimization of horizontal well completion design with cased/perforated or slotted liner completions[J].SPE Production and Operations,2007,22(2):248-253.

共引文献87

同被引文献35

  • 1阳仿勇,张烈辉,陈军.异常高压气藏动态预测模型及应用[J].西南石油学院学报,2004,26(6):24-27. 被引量:10
  • 2陈元千,胡建国.确定异常高压气藏地质储量和有效压缩系数的新方法[J].天然气工业,1993,13(1):53-58. 被引量:20
  • 3马永驰,刘志斌.基于新鲜度函数的油气产量组合预测方法[J].石油学报,2005,26(1):87-90. 被引量:12
  • 4李传亮.异常高压气藏开发上的错误认识[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,29(2):166-169. 被引量:19
  • 5李望,陈军斌.油气渗流力学基础[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,2001:20-21.
  • 6Jin Y, Chen M, Chen K P. Pre-Caspian basin wells in salt-gypsum beds require an optimized drilling fluid[J]. Oil & Gas Journal, 2011, 108(4): 46-53.
  • 7Jin Y, Chen K P, Chen M. Development of tensile stress near a wellbore in radial porous media flows of a high pressure gas[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(8): 1313-1319.
  • 8Wu B, Choi S K, Tan C P. Effect of stress anisotropy on cavity strength and implications in wellbore stability and sand production analyses[C]//Proceedings of the 40th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. Alexandria, Virginia: American Rock Mechanics Association, 2005.
  • 9Papamichos E, Stenebraten J, Cerasi P, et al. Rock type and hole failure pattern effects on sand production[C]//Proceedings of the 42nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium. Alexandria, Virginia: American Rock Mechanics Association, 2008.
  • 10Aadnoy B S, Kaarstad E. Elliptical geometry model for sand production during depletion[R]. SPE 132689-MS, 2010.

引证文献2

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部