期刊文献+

基于AHP-模糊综合评判和FRALST模型的岩溶地下水脆弱性评价 被引量:6

Assessment of the groundwater vulnerability in karst areas by using the fuzzy comprehensive assessment and the FRALST model
原文传递
导出
摘要 岩溶地区因其独特的地质构造,地下水缺乏应有保护带,污染物很容易穿过薄弱的覆盖层下渗到含水层中,对其造成污染。为了预防地下水被污染,及时保护地下水资源,有必要对岩溶地下水进行脆弱性评价。针对云南寻甸县金所盆地岩溶含水层的实际地质模型,在经典DRASTIC模型基础上进行改进,建立AHP-模糊综合评判法和FRALST模型法,对该区域进行地下水脆弱性评价,并进行对比分析。结果表明,AHP-模糊评判法的评价结果,能更客观反映该地区实际情况。 The article is aimed at presenting two improved assessment models of the groundwater vulnerability in the karst areas in Southwest China by using the comprehensive fuzzy assessment and the FRALST model in accordance with the actual karst aquifer geological situation of Jinsuo hasin in Xundian County, Yunnan. The two improved mod- els we have obtained for assessing the groundwater vulnerability in this area can be shown as follows: one is AHP-enmprehensive evaluation model while the other is the improved FRAIST one. And, finally, we have compared the two methods with each other and chosen the better one. In a word, the result of the application of the former model proves to be in consistency with the latter one, with the mere differ- ence being frnm each other on Lhe application scale. In comparison with each other, the FRALST model has certain limitations of its own, whereas the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, which can reflect the practical problem more objectively, is featured with its expertise system and more knowledge-based. Therefore, the result of AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method we have shown can serve as the evident powerful means for disclosing the groundwa- ter vulnerability in this area.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期118-123,共6页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40672175)
关键词 环境学 地下水脆弱性 DRASTIC模型 模糊综合评判 FRALST模型 environmentalology gruund water vulnerability DRASTIC model fuzzy comprehensive evaluation FRAI.ST model
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1章程,蒋勇军,Michèle Lettingue,王松.岩溶地下水脆弱性评价“二元法”及其在重庆金佛山的应用[J].中国岩溶,2007,26(4):334-340. 被引量:49
  • 2史运良,王腊春,朱文孝,苏维词,李坡.西南喀斯特山区水资源开发利用模式[J].科技导报,2005,23(2):52-55. 被引量:28
  • 3ZWAHLEN F. Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst ) aquifers : final report COST action 620 . Brussels: European Commission, 2004.
  • 4FOSTER S S D. Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy[M]//Van DUIJVANBOODEN W, Van WAEGENINGH H G. Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutions. Hague: TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, 1987: 69-86.
  • 5庞君,李峰,庄儒新.曲靖盆地地下水固有脆弱性评价[J].云南地理环境研究,2006,18(4):15-19. 被引量:2
  • 6张少坤,付强,张少东,刘仁涛.基于GIS与熵权的DRASCLP模型在地下水脆弱性评价中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(4):134-137. 被引量:15
  • 7ZHAO Yuguo(赵玉国). Vulnerability assessment of karst ground water base on GIS(基于GIS的岩渗地区地下水脆弱性评价)[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2011, 33-34.
  • 8REN Shichuan(任世川). The vulnerability assessment and karst ground water system in Yangzonghai basin in central Yunnan Province(滇中阳海流域岩渗地下水系统及其脆弱性评估)[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2010.
  • 9GUAN Huili(官辉力), BAO Xinhua(鲍新华). Application of the analytic hierarchy process in fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of water pollution [J]. 地下水,1989(4): 193-198.
  • 10ZHAO Huanchen(赵焕臣). Analytic hierarchy process(层次分析法)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1986.

二级参考文献40

共引文献103

同被引文献124

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部