地下水防污性能评价方法探讨被引量：142

A discussion of groundwater vulnerability assessment methods

下载PDF

导出

摘要地下水防污性能评价是环境规划和决策的有用工具,国外已有许多研究,也提出了各种计算防污性能指数模型。文中着重介绍使用最广泛的DRASTIC模型,并指出其不足之处。根据中国情况,提出用DRTA模型评价潜水的防污性能,用DLCT模型评价承压含水层的防污性能。DRTA模型包含有地下水埋深、包气带评分介质、包气带评分介质的厚度和含水层厚度4 个因子;DLCT模型包含有承压含水层埋深、隔水层岩性、隔水层的连续性和隔水层厚度4个因子。 Groundwater vulnerability assessment is a useful tool for environmental planning and decision-making. Many studies have been carried out and several vulnerability index models have been developed for assessing groundwater vulnerability worldwide. In this paper we present the widely used DRASTIC model, and point out some inadequacies of the model. Considering the situation in China, we propose a DRTA model for vulnerability assessment of unconfined aquifer, and a DLCT model for vulnerability assessment of confined aquifer.The main factors of the DRTA model are: 1depth to water table, 2rating media of the vadose zone, 3 thickness of rating media in the vadose zone and (4) aquifer thickness. The factors of DLCT model are: 1 depth to confined aquifer, 2lithology of the aquiclude, 3 continuity of the aquiclude and (4) thickness of the aquiclude.

作者钟佐燊

机构地区中国地质大学水资源与环境学院

出处《地学前缘》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第U04期3-13,共11页 Earth Science Frontiers

关键词防污性能地下水 DRASTIC 防污性能指数 vulnerability ground water DRASTIC vulnerability index

分类号 X523 [环境科学与工程—环境工程]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1ALLEIR L, BENNETT T, LEHR J H, et al. DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater potential using hydrogeological settings[A]. ROBERT S K. US EPA Report[R]. Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada Oklahorrm,1985.
2IBE K M, COLLIN M L, MELLOULA J. Assessment of ground water vulnerability and its application to the development of protection strategy for the water supply aquifer in Owerri southern Nigeria[J]. EnvironmentalMonitoring and Assessment, 2001, 67:323-360.
3KIM Y J, HAMM S Y. Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique in Cheogju area, South Korea[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 1999, 7:227-235.
4SECUNDA S, COlA.IN M L, MEI.LOUI. A J. Ground water vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel's Saron region[J]. J Environ Management, 1998, 54:39-57.
5付素蓉,王焰新,蔡鹤生,李义连.城市地下水污染敏感性分析[J].地球科学（中国地质大学学报）,2000,25(5):482-486. 被引量：71
6VIERHUFF H. Classification of groundwater resources for regional planning with regard to their vulnerability to pollution[A], van DUIJVENBOODEN W, GLASBERGEN P,van LEYVELD H. Studies in Environmental Science EC].1981,17:1101-1104.
7GOGU R C, DASSARGUES A. Current trends and future challenges in ground water vulnerability assessment using overly and index methods[J]. Environmental Geology, 2000,39 (6):549-559.
8RUPERT M G. Calibration of the DRASTIC ground water vulnerability mapping method[J]. Ground Water, 2001, 39 (4) :625-630.
9NOLAN B T. Relating nitrogen sources and aquifer susceptibility to nitrate in shallow ground water of the United States[J]. Ground Water, 2001,39 (2):290-229.
10TESORIERO A J, TRANK D. Predicting the probability of elevated nitrate concentration in the Puget Sound basin: Implications for aquifer susceptibility and vulnerability [J].Ground Water,1997,35(6) :1029-1039.