摘要
抗日战争开始后,部分史家选择南迁,除却爱国主义与民族主义的驱策外,亦与自身对所处学术机构的依赖、对名节保全的担心、对政治迫害的不安等因素有关。部分史家则因资金短缺、老、病、家庭拖累以及对所处学术环境的依恋,而选择留守。对此问题加以辨析,可使得我们对战时学人的地域性选择问题有一个更为真切的了解。
After the year 1937,the Chinese historian group faced the south and rear dilemma in Beijing and Shanghai.Some historians chose to move to the south,except the patriotism and nationalism driven,for the sake of the academic institution dependent,to save worry,to political persecution of disturbed factors.Some historians,due to shortage of funds,old age,diseases,family burden and the attachment to the academic environment,chose the stay.To explain this phenomenon can help us learn the local wartime decisions of historian so as to have a more clear understanding.
出处
《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2013年第1期160-165,共6页
Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences
基金
2012年浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题"抗战时期的史家群体与国家认同"(12JCLS06YB)
2012年浙江省教育厅项目(Y201224307)
关键词
抗日战争
史学家
南迁
爱国主义
民族主义
Anti-Japanese war
historian group
historian immigrated
patriotism
nationalism
