期刊文献+

城市社区居民健康素养干预效果分析 被引量:13

Effect of the intervention on health literacy of urban residents
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解武汉市城市社区居民健康素养状况,评估居民健康素养综合干预与效果。方法采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法,对城市社区居民进行干预前与干预后健康素养状况进行调查,比较干预前后的效果。结果干预前居民健康素养总正确回答率为73.31%,干预后居民健康素养总正确回答率为76.72%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前后居民知识性健康素养回答正确率分别为77.86%、81.12%;干预前后居民行为性健康素养回答正确率分别为67.86%、70.52%;干预前后居民技能性健康素养回答正确率分别为68.65%、73.50%,3个维度的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论干预后,城市社区居民知识性健康素养有较大提高,效果明显;技能性健康素养虽有提高,但效果不明显;行为性健康素养反而有所降低。在健康教育干预时应加强重点健康行为和技能的演示,同时要适时进行强化。 Objective To understand the health literacy status of urban residents in Wuhan, and to assess the effect of intervention on community health literacy. Methods The multi-stage stratified sampling method was carried out to select the sample population. In the meantime, base-line survey and interventional assessment were carried out to compare the effect of intervention. Results It was found that before and after intervention residents' awareness rate of general health literacy was 73.31%, 76.72% respectively, (significant difference). The awareness rate of general health was 77.86%, 81.12%. resoeetively. The rate of health behavior formation was 67. 86% ,70. 52% ; respectively, and the rate of technical ability formation was 68.65% ,73.50%. respectively. The three dimensions of the differences were statistically significant. Conclusions After the intervention, knowledge of health literacy for urban residents has gready improved, the effect is obvious; skills of health literacy have kept improving, but not obvious, while the behavioral health literacy decreased.. Therefore, health education intervention should be timely strengthened , and focus should be on health behavior and skill demonstrations.
出处 《公共卫生与预防医学》 2013年第1期51-54,共4页 Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
关键词 城市居民 健康素养 干预 Urban residents Health literacy Intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献43

  • 1倪明建,赵尔民.吸毒人群艾滋病防治干预研究[J].地方病通报,2005,20(2):48-52. 被引量:19
  • 2石美玲.心血管病调查研究中血压测量的标准化[J].实用护理杂志,1996,12(8):343-344. 被引量:9
  • 3胡伟,佟伟军,刘彦斌,滕国兴,张永红.吸烟、饮酒与蒙古族高血压的关联性[J].中国公共卫生,2006,22(11):1330-1331. 被引量:39
  • 4卫生部,科技部,统计局.中国居民营养与健康现状[M].北京:中华人民共和国卫生部,2004:5-10.
  • 5中国居民营养与健康状况调查技术执行组,中国居民营养与健康状况调查项目工作办公室.2002年中国居民营养与健康状况调查工作手册[M].北京:中国疾病预防控制中心营养与食品安全所,2002.
  • 6Hu G, Bareng NC, Tuomilehto J, et al. Relationship of physical activity and body mass index to the risk of hypertension: a prospective study in Finland [ J ]. Hypertension, 2004,43 ( 1 ) : 25 - 30.
  • 7卫生部疾病控制司.中国成人超重和肥胖症预防控制指南(试行)[M].北京:卫生部,2003:3-5.
  • 8Orroth KK, Korenromp EL, White RG, et al. Comparison of STD prevalences in the Mwanza, Rakai, and Masaka trial populations: the role of selection bias and diagnostic errors[ J]. Sex Transm Infect,2003,79(2) :982105.
  • 9Abdullah ASM, Fielding R, Hedley A J, et al. Reasons for not usingcondoms among the Hong Kong Chinese population: implications for HIV and STD prevention [ J ). Sex Transm Inf, 2002, 78(2) :1 802 -1 804.
  • 10Regional Office for the Western Pacific. 100% Condom Use Program in Entertainment Establishments[ R]. WHO ,2000.

共引文献174

同被引文献151

引证文献13

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部