期刊文献+

不同子宫切除术式对胰岛素抵抗及血管紧张素转换酶的影响 被引量:1

Comparison of the Effects of Two Types of Hysterectomy on Insulin Resistance and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较开腹全子宫切除术(AH)和腹腔镜辅助的阴式全子宫切除术(LAVH)对胰岛素抵抗及血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)的影响。方法:选择2009年10月至2011年3月择期行全子宫切除术患者80例,按患者意愿分成AH组和LVAH组,每组40例。监测两组患者麻醉前(T0时)、麻醉诱导插管后(T1时)、气腹建立或开腹30分钟(T2时)、气腹撤除或关腹10分钟(T3时)和术后1小时(T4时)、术后次日晨7时(T5时)、术后第3天晨7时(T6时)7个时点的血糖、胰岛素、C-肽、ACE水平,并计算两组患者在不同时点的胰岛素敏感指数(ISI)。结果:①T0时两组患者的血糖、胰岛素、C-肽、ISI和ACE活性比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②AH组血糖水平在T4~T6时均明显高于LAVH组(P<0.01,P<0.05),AH组胰岛素及C-肽水平在T2时低于LAVH组(P<0.01),但T5时和T6时均持续高于LAVH组(P<0.01,P<0.05)。③AH组T4~T6时ISI明显低于LAVH组(P<0.01),两组T5时ISI水平与术中出血量呈负相关(rAH=-0.507,PAH=0.008;rLAVH=-0.424,PLAVH=0.017)。④两组ACE水平在T2、T4时明显高于T0时(P<0.01)。LAVH组ACE水平至T2时点最高,并明显高于AH组(P<0.01),术后下降迅速。结论:两种不同子宫切除术式均引起糖代谢和ACE的异常,LAVH对术后胰岛素抵抗的影响小于传统的AH,但CO2气腹对ACE活性的影响大于AH。 Objective:To compare the effects of Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy (LAVH) and Abdominal Hysterectomy (AH) on insulin resistance and angiotensin-converting enzyme. Methods: Eighty patients (ASA Ⅰ -Ⅱ ) scheduled for hysterectomy from October 2009 to March 2011 were enrolled in this study. According to their own will, the patients were divided into groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ (40 cases in each). Group I were underwent AH, while Group II underwent LAVH. All operations were performed under general anesthesia. The serum levels of blood glucose, insulin, C-peptid, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) were measured at seven time points:before the anesthesia (T0), after induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation (T1) ,30 minutes after beginning the operations (T2), 10 minutes after the end of surgery (T3), 1 hour after the end of surgery (T4) ,7am. on the next day of operation(T5) ,7am. on the third day of opera- tion (T6). And the insulin sensitivity index (ISI) of the patients at different time points were calculated. Re- sults:①Before Anesthesia at TO of two groups of patients with blood glucose, insulin, C peptide, ISI and ACE activity,there were no significant differences( P 〉 0.05). ②Blood glucose levels in AH group fromT4 to T6 were significantly higher than that of LAVH group( P = 0. 000, P =0. 006, P =0. 020) ,AH group of insulin and C-peptide levels at T2 lower than that in LAVH group ( P 〈 0.01, P 〈 0.01 ), but at T5 and T6 were consist- ently higher than that of LAVH group ( P 〈 0.01, P 〈 0.05). ③Intraoperative bleeding volume in LAVH groupwere less than those of AH group (P=0. 000). In AH Group,the levels of ISI from T4 to T6 were obviously lower than those of LAVH group( P=0. 000) ,at T5 the ISI level and operation bleeding volume was nega- tively correlated ( r_AH = -0. 507, P_AH =0. 008 ;r_LAVH = -0. 424, P_LAVH = 0. 017).④Two groups of ACE levels in the intraoperative and postoperative were increased, and at T2 ,T4 was significantly higher than at TO ( P 〈 0. 01 ). The serum concentration of ACE in LAVH group at T2 to the highest, and was obviously higher than that in AH group ( P 〈 0.01 ), but dropped quickly after the operation. Conclusions:Two types of Hysterecto- my led to abnormal glucose metabolism,of which LAVH caused less influence on postoperative insulin resist- ance than AH,but greater influence of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on angiotensin-converting enzyme than AH.
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期56-60,共5页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 子宫切除术 胰岛素抵抗 血管紧张素转换酶 Hysterectomy Insulin resistance Angiotensin-converting enzyme
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献22

  • 1李光伟,Step.,L.检测人群胰岛素敏感性的一项新指数[J].中华内科杂志,1993,32(10):656-660. 被引量:2127
  • 2张红叶,杨军,周北凡,武阳丰,李莹,陶寿淇.我国十组人群脑卒中危险因素的前瞻性研究[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,1996,4(4):150-152. 被引量:91
  • 3曹家琪 连志浩 等.队列(群组)研究.流行病学,第2版,第1卷[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.190-206.
  • 4GORE D C, CHINKES D L, HART D W, et al. Hyperglycemia exacerbates muscle protein catabolism in burn - injured patients [J]. Grit Care Med, 2002,30(11) : 2438 - 2442.
  • 5ELAN J, LAUREL A O, MICHAEL D, et al. The impact of hyperglycemia on patients with severe brain injury[J]. Trauma, 2005,59:47 - 50.
  • 6GUDMUNDSSON F F, GISLASON H G, DIKO A, et al. Effect of prolonged increased intra - abodominal pressure in pigs[J]. Surg Endose, 2001,15(80) : 854 - 860.
  • 7DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique : a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance [J]. Am J Physiol, 1979, 237(3) :E214-E223.
  • 8Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man [J]. Diabetologia, 1985, 28(7):412-419.
  • 9Straczkowski M, Stepien A, Kowalska I, et al. Comparison of simple indices of insulin sensitivity using the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique [ J ]. Med Sci Monit, 2004, 10(8) :480-484.
  • 10Rabasa-Lhoret R, Bastard JP, Jan V, et al. Modified quantitative insulin sensitivity check index is better correlated to hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp than other fasting-based index of insulin sensitivity in different insulin-resistant states [ J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2003, 88 (10) :4917-4923.

共引文献5514

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部