光接入网技术教学设计的探索与实践被引量：1

The Teaching Design Exploration and Practice of Optical Access Network Technology

下载PDF

导出

摘要根据光接入网市场的就业岗位需求不同理论知识和专业技能的特点,将光接入网技术课程内容进行针对性的模块化分割,设计不同的教学方法。本次教学改革对提高工程实践类课程的教学效果,培养学生的实践能力和创新能力,具有一定的参考价值。 According to the optical access network market jobs demand characteristics of different theoretical knowledge and professional skills, the course content of optical access network technology are designed to be modular knowledge. The different teaching methods are designed.The teaching reform of engineering practice course teaching effect, cultivate students＇ practical ability and innovation ability, has the certain reference value.

作者刘丽周向阳李晴陈道群

机构地区华中科技大学武昌分校信息科学与工程学院

出处《科教文汇》 2013年第3期66-66,83,共2页 Journal of Science and Education

关键词光接入网技术教学设计岗位式教学 optical access technology teaching design job-based teaching

分类号 G633.67 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1倪小鹏.教学设计应面向企业培训:论教学设计课程改革[J].中国电化教育,2007(1):14-17. 被引量：13
2李康.教学设计课程中若干问题的探析[J].中国电化教育,2009(3):5-8. 被引量：7
3陈雪.无源光网络技术[M]{H}北京:北京邮电大学出版社,2006.
4刘册;李巍.光纤到户(FTTH)安装调试[M]{H}北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2011.
5张鹏;阎阔.FTTx PON 技术与应用[M]{H}北京:人民邮电出版社,2010.

二级参考文献14

1Walter Lou Carey James O.Carey.教学系统化设计[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002:5.
2何克抗.教学设计理论和方法研究评论[M].北京:中央电大出版社.1999.
3Gary R. Morrison, Steven M . Ross ,Jerrold E Kemp ..设计有效教学[M]..北京:中国轻工业出版社,,2007..10-11..
4莱斯利·P·斯特弗杰里·盖尔高文徐斌燕译.教育中的建构主义[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2002.15,17,21,25.
5Silvem, L. C. Basic Analysis[M]. Los Angeles: Education and Train ing Consultants Company, 1965.
6Branson, R. K. Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development: Executive Summary and Model[M]. Tallahassee, FL: Center for Educational Technology, Florida State University,1975.
7Reiser, R. A. What field did you say you were in? Defimng and naming our field[A]. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology [C]. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill/Prentice Hall, 2002.5-15.
8Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. What is instructional design? [A].In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology [C]. Upper Saddle River, N.J.:Merrill/Prentice Hall, 2002. 16-25.
9Jonassen, D. H. Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? [J]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1991,(3): 5-14.
10Gustafson, K. L., Branch, R. M. Survey of imtructiona development models[M]. Syracuse, N.Y.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources, 2002.