摘要
目的对合肥市7～9岁儿童进行窝沟封闭综合干预所采用的4种召回模式进行分析评价,探讨窝沟封闭综合干预的经验与模式。方法采用标准流程、电话召回、学校群体召回、学校现场封闭4种模式组织召回7～9岁符合窝沟封闭适应证的儿童进行第一恒磨牙窝沟封闭综合干预,对不同召回模式效果进行评价,在6个月和12个月后进行回访,检测窝沟封闭的完好率。对不同模式召回的儿童进行口腔健康干预,并在6个月后对他们进行口腔健康知识问卷调查。结果学校现场封闭组口腔卫生知识和刷牙知识的知晓率分别为89.56%和78.39%,高于其他3个组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。群体召回模式的学校群体召回组、学校现场封闭组窝沟封闭召回实施率分别为95.66%、92.82%,好于零散召回模式的标准流程组和电话召回组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。四手操作窝沟封闭后6个月和12个月封闭物完好率分别为96.63%和85.14%。结论 7～9岁儿童窝沟封闭召回方式尽量采用群体召回尤其是进入学校现场窝沟封闭的模式。
Objective To evaluate 4 recalling modes for pit and fissure sealant in 7-9 years old children in Zunyi and summarize the intervention experience of Zunyi in the pit and fissure sealant.Methods Recalled 7-9 years old children whose first permanent molars met the pit and fissure sealant indications in groups or scattered,to execute pit and fissure sealant intervention,and evaluated the results of different recall modes.Children were followed up after 6 months and 12 months to check the sealant retention rate.Questionnaire survey of oral health knowledge and oral health behavior was done before and after oral health intervention.Results The oral health awareness of the group which were conducted during oral health classes reached 89.56%.The different effects of pit and fissure sealant project varied while recall models were different,and group recall mode was better.The rate of the pit and fissure sealant recall in school reached 95.66%,which was the best.The retention rate of sealant in four hand operation group after 6 months and 12 months were 96.63% and 85.14%,and achieved the project requirements.Conclusion The pit and fissure sealant recall should choose group mode in Zunyi.
出处
《广东牙病防治》
2013年第1期19-22,共4页
Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
基金
合肥市科技项目(遵市科合社重字[2009]2号)
关键词
窝沟封闭
儿童口腔健康教育
项目管理评价
Pit and fissure sealant
Children＇s oral health education
Programme management evaluation
