期刊文献+

UniCel DXI800全自动磁性微粒子化学发光免疫分析系统性能评价 被引量:4

Preliminary functional evaluation on chemiluminescence immunoassay system by CLSI EP10-A2
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的对UniCel DXI800全自动磁性微粒子化学发光免疫分析系统(以下简称DXI800)的分析性能进行初步评价。方法选择雌二醇(E2)、泌乳素(PRL)、促卵胞生成素(FSH)、三碘甲状腺原氨酸(TT3)等4个项目,应用《临床实验室定量检测试验的初步评价批准指南》(EP10-A2)对其分析性能进行初步评价。结果 E2低、中、高值的总不精密度分别为7.79%、5.21%、4.48%,偏倚分别为-2.45%、-1.90%、-0.40%。FSH低、中、高值的总不精密度分别为3.58%、4.81%、4.71%,偏倚分别为6.84%、4.73%、0.93%。PRL低、中、高值的总不精密度分别为2.63%、3.10%、2.24%,偏倚分别为-0.03%、-0.65%、-0.50%。TT3低、中、高值的总不精密度分别为2.71%、1.60%、2.05%,偏倚分别为-0.01%、0.01%、-0.05%。E2、FSH、PRL、TT3 4个项目的截距、斜率、携带污染率、非线性、线性漂移等指标的t检验值均介于-4.6到4.6之间。结论 UniCel DXI800具有很好的分析性能,能满足临床标本检测的需要。 Objective To evaluate the performance of UniCel DXI800 automated chemiluminescence immunoassay system.Methods The indexes of E2,FSH,PRL,TT3 were detected according to the CLSI Document EP10-A2 preliminary evaluation of quantitative clinical laboratory methods:approved guideline.Results The high,medium,low total imprecision of E2 were 7.79%,5.21%,4.48%,the bias of them were-2.45%,-1.90%,-0.40%.The high,medium,low total imprecision of FSH were 3.58%,4.81%,4.71%,the bias of them were 6.84%,4.73%,0.93%.The high,medium,low total imprecision of PRL were 2.63%,3.10%,2.24%,the bias of them were-0.03%,-0.65%,-0.50%.The high,medium,low total imprecision of TT3 were 2.71%,1.60%,2.05%,the bias of them were-0.01%,0.01%,-0.05%.The indexes of slope,intercept, precision,carryover rate,linearity and total repeatability accorded with the prescriptive range.Conclusion The performance of DXI800 automated chemiluminescence immunoassay system is reliable and suitable for clinical laboratory to use.
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2013年第2期140-141,共2页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 EP10-A2 性能评价 化学发光 DXI800 EP10-A2 chemiluminescence immunoassay DXI800
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1吴健民.影响肿瘤标志物检测的因素[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(4):352-354. 被引量:23
  • 2张秀明,庄俊华,徐宁,黄宪章,郑松柏,王建兵,曹永坚,尹一兵.不同检测系统4种心肌酶测定结果的比对与临床可接受性评价[J].临床检验杂志,2005,23(6):404-407. 被引量:34
  • 3张秀明,李炜煊,郑松柏,陈滨鸿,曹永坚,孙蕾,林莲英,柯培锋,马骥.不同检测系统17项常规生化结果的比对和偏倚评估[J].检验医学,2007,22(2):166-170. 被引量:47
  • 4NCCLS Preliminary Evaluation of Quantitative Clinical Laboratory Methods; Approved Guideline EP10 - A, 1998,18(6).
  • 5卫生部临床检验中心.临床实验室(定量测定)室内质量控制工作指南(讨论稿2).临床实验室质量管理文件汇编,1993:31-45.
  • 6Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.EP6-A2.Evaluation of the linearity of quantative analytical methods[S].Wayne PA:CLSI,2003:1247.
  • 7中国合格评定国家认可委员会.医学实验室质量和能力认可准则(ISO 15189)[S].北京:中国合格评定国家认可委员会,2008:1-36.
  • 8Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.EP5-A2.Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods[S].Wayne PA:CLSI,2004.
  • 9Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.EP15-A2.User demonstration of performance for precision and accuracy[S].Wayne PA:CLSI,2004.
  • 10Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.EP-17A.Protocols for determination of limits of detection and limits of quantitation;approved guideline[S].Wayne PA:CLSI,2004.

共引文献22

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部