期刊文献+

开放同行评审的产生、发展、成效与可行性 被引量:33

原文传递
导出
摘要 本文归纳了国外开放同行评审的产生、发展过程。1996年以来,开放同行评审实践取得了显著的成效,本文从开放同行评审要素和开放同行评审模式两个方面进行了系统的阐释,并从理论上论述了开放同行评审的可行性。
出处 《中国科技期刊研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期40-44,共5页 Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1任胜利,王久丽.同行评议中审稿人遴选方式对审稿结果的影响——以《自然科学进展》为例[J].中国科技期刊研究,2006,17(5):722-725. 被引量:38
  • 2Alison McCook. Is Peer Review Broken?. The Scientist, 2006,20 (2) :26.
  • 3Peter M. Rothwell, Christopher N review in clinical neuroscience: Is greater than would be expected by (9) : 1964 - 1969 Martyn. Reproducibility of peer agreement between reviewers any chance alone?. Brain, 2000,123.
  • 4Rowland, Fytton. The Peer-Review Process. Learned Publishing, 2002,15(4) : 247 -258.
  • 5张蕾.呼唤挑战性的科技创新成果——访中国地球物理学会天灾预测专业委员会顾问陈一文.光明日报,2004:08-27.
  • 6任胜利.科技论文的同行评议[J].中国有色金属学报,2004,14(11). 被引量:14
  • 7Tamara Sumner, Simon Buckingham Shum. Open Peer Review & Argumentation: Loosening the Paper Chains on Journals [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011-11-13 ]. http ://www. ariadne, ac. uk/issueS/jime/.
  • 8Erik Sandewall. Systems: Opening up the process [ EB/OL ]. [ 20l 1-11-13 ]. http ://blogs. nature, corn/peer-to-peer/2006/06/ systems_opening_up_the_process, html.
  • 9Richard Smith. Opening up BMJ peer review [ EB/OL]. [ 2011-11- 13 ]. http ://www. bmj. com/content/318/7175/4.
  • 10JMIR. Editorial Policies [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011-11-13 ]. http://www. jmir. org/about/editorialPolicies peerReviewProcess.

二级参考文献13

  • 1孙树江.专家审稿与编辑把关[J].编辑学报,2001,13(z1):56-57. 被引量:9
  • 2朱美香.遏制审稿失范 提高审稿质量[J].编辑学报,2004,16(3):180-181. 被引量:61
  • 3The Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers(ALPSP). Current practice in peer review: Results of a survey conducted during Oct/Nov 2000. [ 2004--02-20 ]. http://www.alpsp.org/ publications/ peerev. pdf
  • 4Rennie D. Fourth international congress on peer review in biomedical publication. Journal of the American Medical Association,2002, 287(21 ) : 275 -2760
  • 5National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2002.[ 2004--02-21 ]. www. nsf. gov/sbe/srs/ seind02
  • 6Kronick D A. Peer review in the 18th-century scientific journalism.J Am Med Assoc, 1990, 263 : 132 - 1322
  • 7Advice to contributors. [ 2004--02-21]. http://bmj. bmjjournals.com/advice/
  • 8Mccook A. Is peer review broken? The Scientist, 2006, 20(2 ) : 26-30. [2006--03--02 ]. http://www.the-scientist. com/ 2006/2/1/26/1/
  • 9Brown T. Peer Review and the Acceptance of new Scientific Ideas.London: Sense About Science, 2004
  • 10Willamson A. What will happen to peer review? Learned Publishing,2003, 16:15 - 19

共引文献50

同被引文献298

引证文献33

二级引证文献259

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部