期刊文献+

TP方案与NP方案诱导化疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效观察 被引量:8

Observational study on the induction chemotherapy of TP and NP regimens in unresectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨TP方案和NP方案诱导化疗局部晚期NSCLC的疗效优势。方法收集我院2008年1月至2010年1月接受化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者(其中鳞癌26例,腺癌44例,大细胞肺癌32例)102例,随机分为TP方案化疗组(A组,51例)和NP方案化疗组(B组,51例)。比较两组不同化疗方案治疗局部晚期NSCLC的近期疗效、Karnofsky评分、毒副反应和随访1、2年的生存情况。结果 A、B两组的总有效率分别为54.9%和43.1%,生活质量改善率分别为80.4%和72.5%,1年生存率分别49.0%和45.1%,2年生存率分别13.7%和11.8%,中位生存期为14.5和13个月,A组略优于B组,但两组疗效在统计学上均无显著性差异(P<0.05)。两组在毒副反应方面静脉炎、脱发等副反应方面有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论 TP方案和NP方案诱导化疗局部晚期NSCLC均为合理,安全,有效的两种方案,均可作为一线方案推荐临床应用,但TP方案比NP方案在患者耐受性和不良反应方面更好。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of induction chemotherapy for patients with local advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) between TP and NP regimen. Methods collecting 102 advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients ( Including 26 ca- ses of squamous cell carcinoma, 44 cases of adenocarcinoma and 32 cases of large cell lung cancer)who have received Chemotherapy dur- ing February, 2008 to February, 2010 in our hospital as our study subjects. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, group one ( group A, n = 51 ) was treated with TP chemotherapy and group two ( group B, n = 51 ) was treated with NP chemotherapy. We trying to compare the curative effect, Karuofsky scores,the toxic and adverse effects and the survival condition after one and 2 years between these pairs. Results The total effective rate of the group A and group B was 54.9% and 43. 1%, and the rate of quality of life improvement was 80. 4% and 72.5%. The accumulate survival rate after one year of the group A and group B was 49.0% and 45.1%, accumulate survival rate after two year was 13.7% and 11.8%. Two groups of curative effect had no significant difference in statistically. Complica- tions of two groups, hair loss and phlebitis with significant differences ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Both the chemotherapy TP and NP methods are reasonable, safe, effective treatments for locally adanced NSCLC, could be used as first-line schemes for the clinical application, but tolerance and adverse reaction of TP method is better than NP method.
作者 孔轶
出处 《临床肺科杂志》 2013年第2期222-224,共3页 Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
关键词 非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC) 化疗 比较 Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) chemotherapy comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1荆新建,任中海,杜敏.金喜素联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌56例近期疗效观察[J].中国全科医学,2004,7(20):1504-1505. 被引量:10
  • 2周超,胡斌,彭卫东,方平.NP方案与TP方案对初治晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效的对比观察[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2006,11(10):749-751. 被引量:10
  • 3Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al, Paclitaxel-carboplatin aloneor with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer [ J]. N Engl JMed, 2006,355(24) :2542 -2550.
  • 4Lin Q, Wang J, Liu Y, et al. High-dose 3-dimensional conformalradiotherapy with concomitant vinorelbine plus carboplatin in pa-tients with non-small cell lung cancer: A feasibility study[J]. OncolLett, 2011,2(4):669 -674.
  • 5Waechter F, Passweg J, Tamm M, et al. Significant progress inpalliative treatment of non - small cell lung cancer in the past dec-adet J]. Chest,2005,127(3):738 -747.
  • 6Wakelee HA,Middleton G,Dunlop D,et al. A phase I pharmaco-kinetic study of bexarotene with vinorelbine and cisplatin in patientswith advanced non-small-cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) [ J]. CancerChemother Pharmacol, 2012,69(3) :815 -824.
  • 7Pemg RP, Shih JF, Chen YM, et al. A phase II trial of vinorel-bine and cisplatin in previously untreated inoperable non-small-celllung cancer[ J]. Am J Clin Oncol,2000, 23( 1) :60 -64.
  • 8李亚星,张晓华,游善喜,等.TP与NP方案全身化疗治疗NSCLC疗效观察[J].实用临床医学杂志,2011, 15(24).-88 -90.
  • 9Bennouna J, Senellart H, Hiret S, et al. Impact of histology on sur-vival of resected non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC) receiving ad-juvant chemotherapy : subgroup analysis of the adjuvant vinorelbine(NVB) cisplatin ( CDDP) versus observation in the ANITA trial[J]. Lung Cancer, 2011,74(1) :30 -34.

二级参考文献11

共引文献18

同被引文献79

引证文献8

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部