期刊文献+

转矩对微螺钉种植体初期稳定性影响的三维有限元研究 被引量:5

Influence of the diameter and length of the mini-implant on the primary stability after loading with composite forces
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过三维有限元方法探讨转矩对不同直径与长度的微螺钉种植体初期稳定性的影响,为正畸临床提供参考。方法建立96个上颌骨实体模型,并建立直径分别为1.2、1.6、2.0mm,长度分别为6、8、10、12mm共12种尺寸的微螺钉种植体实体模型,将每种尺寸的种植体分别与8个上颌骨模型结合,并用随机数表法随机选出4个加载1.96N水平力(水平力组),另外4个加载6N·mm转矩和1.96N水平力(复合作用组),分析两组种植体位移峰值的区别,以及两种加载条件下直径和长度对种植体位移峰值的影响。结果种植体长度不改变加载条件对位移峰值的影响,但种植体直径与加载条件间有相互作用,种植体直径为1.2、1.6、2.0mm时水平力组种植体位移峰值[分别为(7.71±0.49)、(3.94±0.31)、(2.32±0.43)μm]均显著低于复合作用组[分别为(9.22±0.63)、(4.62.4-0.52)、(2.69±0.49)灿m](P〈0.05)。种植体直径为1.2mm时的两组位移峰值差值[(1.61士0.22)μm]显著大于直径为1.6、2.0mm时的两组位移峰值差值[(0.64±0.12)、(0.49±0.06)μm](P〈0.05)。结论水平力复合转矩对种植体初期稳定性存在不利影响,对种植体同时施加转矩和水平力时应使用直径大于1.2mm的种植体。 Objective To investigate the influence of the diameter and length of the mini-implant on the primary stability after loading with composite forces (CF) which contained torque and horizontal forces (HF). Methods Ninety-six finite element models were established by the combination of mini-implant and bone, diameters (1.2 ram, 1.6 mm, 2. 0 mm ) and length ( 6 ram, 8 mm, 10 ram, 12 mm). There were 12 sizes, each size corresponded with 8 models. Group HF ( each size n = 4) was loaded with 1.96 N horizontal force and Group CF ( each size n = 4) was loaded with composite force which contained 6 N mm torque and 1.96 N horizontal force. The maximum displacement of mini-implant with different force directions, implant diameters and lengths were evaluated. Results The effect of force direction on the displacement related to diameter of mini-implant. The maximum displacement under load with HF respectively was changed with the changing of diameter[ 1.2 mm: (7.71 ±0. 49) μm; 1.6 ram: (3.94 ±0. 31 ) μm; 2.0 mm: (2. 32 ±0. 43 ) μm], which were smaller than the maximum displacement of Group CF[1.2mm: (9.22±0.63) μm; 1.6 mm:(4.62±0.52) μm; 2.0 mm: (2.69 ±0.49) μm ](P〈 0. 05). When diameter was 1.2 mm, the difference of the maximum displacement[ ( 1.61 ± 0. 22) μm] between Group HF and CF was more obvious than that when the diameter was 1.6 mm or 2. 0 mm[ (0. 64±0. 12), (0. 49 ±0. 06) μm ] (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusions The composite force had unfavorable effect on the primary stability of the mini-implant. The diameter of the mini-implant had better be larger than 1.2 mm when the composite forces were applied.
出处 《中华口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期37-40,共4页 Chinese Journal of Stomatology
关键词 转矩 有限元分析 正畸支抗 微螺钉种植体 Torque Finite element analysis Orthodontic anchorage procedures Mini-screw
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1De Clerck H, Cornelis M, Timmerman H. Dental tours de force 4. The use of a bone anchor for holding upright a tipped molar in the lower jaw. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd ,2004,111 ( 1 ) : 10-13.
  • 2郭冬梅,常少海,胡玲玲,鲁颖娟,叶玉珊.Tomas微种植体矫治力系统竖直倾斜磨牙的三维有限元研究[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2012,19(2):86-91. 被引量:5
  • 3Jasmine MIF, Yezdani AA, Tajir F, et al. Analysis of stress in bone and microimplants during en-masse retraction of maxillary andmandibular anterior teeth with different insertion angulations: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics ,2012,141 ( 1 ) : 71-80.
  • 4Cheng SJ,Tseng IY, Lee JJ, et al. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ,2004,19 ( 1 ) : 100-106.
  • 5Ao J, Li T, Liu Y, et al. Optimal design of thread height and width on an immediately loaded cylinder implant: a finite element analysis. Comput Biol Med,2010,40(8) : 681-686.
  • 6Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofae Implants, 1993,8 ( 2 ) : 151-161.
  • 7Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985 : 199-209.
  • 8Barros SE, Janson G, Chiqueto K, et al. Effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2011,140 (4) : 181-192.
  • 9Chan E, Darendeliler MA. Physical properties of root cementum : Part 5. Volumetric analysis of root resorption craters after application of light and heavy orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ,2005,127 (2) : 186-195.
  • 10Chung KR, Kim SH, Chaffee MP, et al. Molar distalization with a partially integrated mini-implant to correct unilateral Class I malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 138 ( 6 ) : 810-819.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Mack F,Schwahn C,Feine JS. The impact of tooth loss on general health related to quality of life among elderly Pomeranians:results from the study of health in Pomerania (SHIP-O)[J].International Journal of Prosthodontics,2005,(05):414-419.
  • 2Kinzinger GS,Eren M,Dedrich PR. Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization:a literature review[J].European Journal of Orthodontics,2008,(06):558-571.
  • 3Patel MP,Janson G,Henriques JF. Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances[J].American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2009,(03):336-342.
  • 4Kinzinger G,pantel C,Ludwig B. Effects of conventional anchorage on premolar root development during treatment with a pendulum appliance[J].Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics,2010,(04):281-289.
  • 5Acar AG,Gürsoy S,Dincer M. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination[J].European Journal of Orthodontics,2010,(04):459-465.
  • 6Motoyoshi M,Yano S,Tsuruoka T. Biomechanical effect of abutment on stability of orthodontic mini-implant.A finite element analysis[J].Clinical Oral Implants Research,2005,(04):480-485.
  • 7Wilmes B,Panayotidis A,Drescher D. Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants:a biomechanical in vitro study[J].European Journal of Orthodontics,2011,(04):396-401.
  • 8Florvaaq B,Kneuertz P,Lazar F. Biomechanical properties of orthodontic miniscrews.An in-vitro study[J].Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics,2010,(01):53-67.
  • 9Kojima Y,Fukui H. A numerical simulation of tooth movement by wire bending[J].American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2006,(04):452-459.doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.028.
  • 10Ono A,Motoyoshi M,Shimizu N. Cortical hone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants[J].International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,2008,(04):334-340.

共引文献20

同被引文献60

  • 1赵弘,刘洪臣,顾晓明.骨皮质厚度及植入角度对支抗种植钉影响的三维有限元分析[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2010,11(1):24-27. 被引量:15
  • 2中华医学会内分泌学分会.中国成人2型糖尿病预防的专家共识[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2014,30(4). 被引量:177
  • 3邓锋,张磊,张翼,宋锦璘,樊瑜波.微植体支抗-骨界面的生物力学研究及微植体颈部优化设计探讨[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2007,38(4):701-704. 被引量:10
  • 4Rodriguez JC, Suarez F, Chan HL, et al. Implants for orthodontic anchorage: success rates and reasons of failures [J]. Implant Dent, 2014, 23(2): 155-161.
  • 5Alrbata RH, Ha DW, Yu W,et al. Optimal asymmetric thread for orthodontic micro-implants: Laboratory and clinicalevaluation[J]. AngleOrthod, 2015, 85(4): 585-590.
  • 6Zheng J, Yang Y, Lou S, et al. Construction and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of degenerative scoliosis[J]. JOrthopSurg Res, 2015, 10(1): 189.
  • 7Begum MS, Dinesh MR, Tan KF, et al. Construction of a three-dimensional finite element model of maxillary first molar and it's supporting structures[J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2015,7(Suppl2): S443-450.
  • 8Chatzigianni A, Keilig L, Duschner H, et al. Comparative analysis of numerical and experimental data of orthodontic mini-implants[J].Eur J Orthod, 2011, 33(5): 468-475.
  • 9Lin TS, Tsai FD, Chen CY, et al. Factorial analysis of variables affecting bone stress adjacent to the orthodontic anchorage mini-implant with finite element analysis [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013,143(2): 182—189.
  • 10Chatzigianni A, Keilig L, Reimann S,et al. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2011, 33: 381-387.

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部