期刊文献+

美国在线课程的评价原则及启示 被引量:16

Evaluation Principles and the Implications of Online Courses in the U.S.
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 线课程是美国高等教育迅速发展的生力军。为了保证网络教育的质量,美国相关教育研究机构和各高等院校非常重视对在线课程的评价,并通过建立评价机制,关注教师发展和学生成长,使评价成为教育发展的风向标,通过评价保证在线教育的质量。本文旨在通过审视美国在线课程的发展现状,分析在线课程的评价原则,从而反思我国高校网络课程在评价过程中存在的问题。 Online courses are an important aspect in the rapid development of higher education in the U. S.. In order to ensure the quality of online education, educational and research institutions and institutions of higher learning attach great importance to the evaluation of online courses. The education institutions are paying more and more attention to faculty development and cultivation of the students by building evaluation mechanism. Evaluation has led the development of online education. This paper aims to ex- amine the status quo development of online courses in the United States, and analysis online course evaluation principles with an intention to reflect on the problems in the process of network course evaluation.
作者 郭富平
出处 《华北科技学院学报》 2012年第4期95-98,共4页 Journal of North China Institute of Science and Technology
基金 华北科技学院教研基金资助课题 编号:HKJYZZ 201155
关键词 美国 在线课程 评价原则 启示 United States online courses evaluation principles implications
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1The Institute for Higher Education Policy(2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for Success in In- ternet - based Distance Education[ EB/OL]. Re- trieved from [ www. nea. org/assets/docs/HE/ QualityOnTheLine. pdf ], 2012 -07 -06.
  • 2Allen, I. Elaine & Seaman, Jeff (2011). Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011 [ EB/OL]. Retrieved from [ www. on- linelearningsurvey, com/reports/goingthedistance pdf] ,2012 - 07 - 06.
  • 3Oliver, Martin ( 2000 ) . Evaluating Online Teaching and Learning [ EB/OL ] . Information Services & Use, 2000,20:83 -94.
  • 4Palloff, Rena M. & Pratt, Keith (2008). Effec- tive Course, Faculty, and Program Evaluation [ C]. 24^th Annual Conference on Distance Teach- ing & Learning.
  • 5Nuemann, R ( 2000 ) . Communicating Student Evluation of Teaching Results: rating interpreta- tion guides [ J ] . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2) : 121 - 134.
  • 6Daley, Barbara J. , Canas, Alberto J. , Stark- Schwetzer, Tracy. Cmap Tools : Integrating Teaching, Learning, and Evaluation in Online Courses [ J]. New Directions for Adult and Con- tinuing Education,2007,113 : 37 - 47.
  • 7Southwestern College. Tenure Review & Faculty Evaluation Manual [ EB/OL ] . Retrieved from [ www. swccd, edu/Pdfs/EvalPmcFacOnlineHybridTR- Manl. pdf], 2012 - 7 - 16.
  • 8陈庚,丁新,袁松鹤,徐,蔡永.网络课程要素分析及建设[J].开放教育研究,2008,14(6):73-79. 被引量:52

二级参考文献8

共引文献51

同被引文献161

引证文献16

二级引证文献173

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部