摘要
ASSIST和R-SPQ-2F是国外两个比较成熟的学习方式调查问卷。通过比较发现两者理论基础不同,ASSIST问卷以现象图析学为方法论,而R-SPQ-2F的理论基础是认知心理学;两者的结构不同,ASSIST的三个子量表之间相互印证,而R-SPQ-2F更多的强调互动机制与结果;两者的应用层面不同,ASSIST主要在宏观层面,而R-SPQ-2F更强调微观层面。尽管如此,两者最终都走向了"学习方式并非个体特征,而受个人经验与教学、评价方式和学习环境的共同作用,具有情境性"的结论。
The research on study of college students is more mature in foreign countries. We compare ASSIST with R - SPQ - 2F, which are questionnaires about the learning approaches of college students. Accordingly, we find that they are based on different theories, phenomenography or cognitive psychology. Meanwhile, their structures are different from each other, one is confirmed, and the other is cause and effect. In fact, there is some distinction between their application levels, macro - level or micro - level. However, various methods lead to the same conclusion that approaches to learning of college students are contextual not individual characteristics, which derive from individual experience, teaching, assessing, and learning environment.
出处
《高等教育研究学报》
2012年第4期55-58,共4页
Journal of Higher Education Research
