期刊文献+

策略不确定条件下基于高阶超博弈的军事对抗决策方法 被引量:1

Military antagonism decision approach based high-level hypergame under the uncertainty of strategy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 军事对抗决策中面临的一个主要问题是难以确定敌方的策略集。基于超博弈分析策略不确定条件下的军事对抗决策问题。在分析超博弈中信念迭代原理的基础上,提出了基于高阶超博弈的对抗决策方法。将高阶信念中的结果反思到低阶信念,并最终反思到一阶信念中,将己方的决策建立在对敌方可能决策的分析的基础上。使得己方的决策具有针对性且更加合理。以二战中西线战役为例验证了方法的可行性和有效性。 The main problem of military antagonism decision is its difficulty to confirm the strategy set of adversary. This research analyzes the military decision under the uncertainty of strategy set based on hypergame. The decision approach of high-level hypergame was proposed after analysis the belief relationship of each level. The result of high-level was put back to low-level to refine the decision based on the analysis of the possible decision of adversary. Consequently, this makes decision of friendly forces more pertinent and reasonable against to adversary. Finally an example is used to illustrate the approach.
出处 《国防科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期136-140,共5页 Journal of National University of Defense Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(91024006 71101149 71001105 71031007)
关键词 策略 不确定 对抗决策 高阶超博弈 strategy uncertainty decision under antagonism high-level hypergame
分类号 E917 [军事]
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1崔焰,宋业新.具有模糊偏好认知矩阵的超对策稳定性分析[J].海军工程大学学报,2007,19(6):103-107. 被引量:4
  • 2Russell R V, Paul E L. Using hypergames to increase planned payoff and reduce risk [ J ]. Autonomous Agents and Multi- Agent Systems, 2002, 5(3) : 365 -380.
  • 3Said A K, Hartley D A. A hypergame approach to crisis decision-making: the 1973 Middle East War [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1982, 33(10) : 937 -948.
  • 4Muhong W, Hipel K W, Fraser N M. Solution concepts in hypergames [ J ]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 1989, 34: 147-171.
  • 5姜鑫,王长春,杜正军,陈超.基于博弈网的军事决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011,31(7):1387-1393. 被引量:3
  • 6栾兵,宋业新,瞿勇.具有模糊策略和结局偏好认知的超对策集结模型[J].计算机与数字工程,2011,39(2):1-5. 被引量:5
  • 7宋业新,王发坤,瞿勇.多冲突环境下的两人一阶超对策交互集结模型[J].系统工程与电子技术,2010,32(8):1672-1676. 被引量:8
  • 8Bennett P G, Dando M R. Complex strategic analysis: A hypergame study of the fall France [ J ]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1979, 30( 1 ) : 23 - 32.
  • 9Hipel K W, Muhong W, Fraser N M. Hypergame analysis of the Falkland Islands crisis [ J ]. International Studies Quarterly, 1988, 32(3) : 335 -358.
  • 10John C H. Games with incomplete information played by "Bayesian" players, parts I-III [ J ]. Management Science, 1967, 14:159-182,320-334,486-502.

二级参考文献66

  • 1宋业新,董青.一阶超对策模型中结局偏好认知信息集结的模式识别法[J].海军工程大学学报,2006,18(1):1-5. 被引量:4
  • 2宋业新,瞿勇,张建军.军事冲突中战术欺骗的一个优化模型[J].海军工程大学学报,2006,18(5):10-13. 被引量:3
  • 3Takehiro INOHARA,Keith W. HIPEL,Sean WALKER.CONFLICT ANALYSIS APPROACHES FOR INVESTIGATING ATTITUDES AND MISPERCEPTIONS IN THE WAR OF 1812[J].Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,2007,16(2):181-201. 被引量:31
  • 4[14]Li,K.W.,Hipel,K.W.,Kilgour,D.L.& Fang,L.(2004).Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution.IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man and Cybernetics Part A,34 (4):507-520
  • 5[15]Libraries and Archives Canada,(2002).Introduction-War of 1812-From colony to country:A reader's guide to Canadian military history.In:Collections Canada.Available via http://www.collectionscanada.ca/military/h1 3-5001-e.html.Cited January 4,2006
  • 6[16]Obeidi,A.,Hipel,K.W.& Kilgour,D.M.(2005).The role of emotions in envisioning outcomes in conflict analysis.Group Decision and Negotiation,14 (6):481-500
  • 7[17]Nash,J.F.,(1950).Equilibrium points in n-player games.Proceedings National Academy of Sciences,36:48-49
  • 8[18]Nash,J.F.(1951).Non-cooperative games.Annals of Mathematics,54 (2):286-295
  • 9[19]Patterson,B.R.(2005).The Generals:Andrew Jackson,Sir Edward Packenham and the Road to the Battle of New Orleans.New York University Press,New York
  • 10[20]Perkins,B.(1961) Prologue to War;England and the United States.University of California Press,Los Angeles

共引文献37

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部