期刊文献+

具有模糊偏好认知矩阵的超对策稳定性分析 被引量:4

Hypergame stability analysis with fuzzy preference perception matrix
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对一类具有模糊偏好认知矩阵的超对策问题,给出了具体的稳定性分析方法。基于相对模糊距离的概念和模糊有序加权平均(FOWA)算子提出了三角模糊互补判断矩阵的一种排序方法。由此方法得到局中人的结局偏好认知向量,进而给出了一阶超对策的稳定性分析过程。最后,以实际冲突为例说明这一方法。 This paper presents a specific stability analysis method for a kind of hypergame situation with fuzzy preference perception matrix. A priority method was proposed of triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrix based on a fuzzy ordered and weighted average (FOWA) aggregation operator and the concept of relative fuzzy distance measure was proposed. The plays′ outcome prefer- ence perception vector was obtained though this method, and then the process of first- level hyper- game stability analysis given. Finally, a real world conflict was analyzed as an example to illustrate the proposed method.
作者 崔焰 宋业新
出处 《海军工程大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第6期103-107,112,共6页 Journal of Naval University of Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70471031 60774029) 海军工程大学科研基金资助项目(HGDJJ06004)
关键词 超对策 模糊偏好认知矩阵 稳定性分析 hypergame fuzzy preference perception matrix stability analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1FRASER N M, HIPEL K W. Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions [M]. New York: Elsevier, 1984.
  • 2WANG M, FRASER N M, HIPEL K W. Modeling misperceptions in games [J]. Behavioral Science, 1988,33:207--223.
  • 3宋业新,董青.一阶超对策模型中结局偏好认知信息集结的模式识别法[J].海军工程大学学报,2006,18(1):1-5. 被引量:4
  • 4宋业新,瞿勇,张建军.军事冲突中战术欺骗的一个优化模型[J].海军工程大学学报,2006,18(5):10-13. 被引量:3
  • 5TAKAHASHI M A, FRASER N M, HIPEL K W. A procedure for analyzing hypergames [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1984,18 : 111 -- 122.
  • 6HIPEL K W, WANG M, FRASER N M. Hypergame analysis of the Falkland Island crisis [J]. Internat. Stud. Quart., 1988,32:335-358.
  • 7HIPEL K W, DAGNINO A, FRASER N M. A hypergame algorithm for modeling misperceptions in bargaining [J].J. Environmental Management, 12(1988) :131--152.
  • 8TRAN L, DUCKSTEIN L. Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2002,130:331--341.
  • 9YAGER R R, KACPRZYK J. The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operator: Theory and Applications [M]. Boston, MA:Kluwer Academic Pablishers, 1997.
  • 10徐泽水.基于FOWA算子的三角模糊数互补判断矩阵排序法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003,23(10):86-89. 被引量:55

二级参考文献28

  • 1Xu ZeshuiInstituteofSciences,PLAUniversityofScienceandTechnology,Nanjing210016,China.TWO APPROACHES TO IMPROVING THE CONSISTENCY OF COMPLEMENTARY JUDGEMENT MATRIX[J].Applied Mathematics(A Journal of Chinese Universities),2002,17(2):227-235. 被引量:5
  • 2吴晓锋,周洪江,李志超,王慕鸿.军事欺骗计划的一种策划方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,27(6):1048-1053. 被引量:2
  • 3宋业新,董青.一阶超对策模型中结局偏好认知信息集结的模式识别法[J].海军工程大学学报,2006,18(1):1-5. 被引量:4
  • 4Wang M,Hipel K W,Frase N M.Solution concepts in hypergames[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,1989,34:147-171.
  • 5Putro U S,Kijima K,Takahashi S.Adaptive learning of hypergame situations using a genetic algorithm[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man and Cybernetics(Part A:Systems and Humans),2000,5:562-572.
  • 6Hipel K W,Wang M,Frase N M.Hypergame analysis of the Falkland Island crisis[J].Internat.Stud.Quart.,1988,32:335-358.
  • 7Song Y X,Wang Q,Li Z J.A group decision making method for integrating outcome preferences in hypergame situations[J].Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence,2005,3613:676-683.
  • 8Song Y X,Qu Y,Liu Z R,et al.Fusion and automatic ranking of fuzzy outcome preferences information in hypergame models[A].Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics[C].Guangzhou:IEEE,2005.
  • 9Wang M H, Hipel K W, Frase N M. Modeling misperceptions in games [J]. Behavioral Science, 1988,33:207--223.
  • 10Song Y X, Wang Q, Li Z J. A group decision making method for integrating outcome preferences in hypergame situations [J]. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2005, 3613:676--683.

共引文献58

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部