期刊文献+

TIC、DWI与MRS对乳腺癌诊断价值的比较 被引量:4

Comparison of the value of signal intensity time course,DWI and MRS in the diagnosis of breast cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨并比较TIC(时间-信号强度曲线)、DWI与MRS对乳腺癌的诊断价值。方法搜集乳腺癌患者31例,全部行动态增强扫描及DWI(b=1000s/mm2)和1 H-MRS扫描,31例均获病理证实,其中导管内癌25例、乳头状癌4例、粘液腺癌2例,统计比较动态增强曲线、DWI及MRS诊断乳腺癌的敏感度、特异度及诊断符合率。结果动态增强曲线、DWI及MRS诊断乳腺癌的敏感度分别为96.6%、91.6%、85.7%,特异度分别为50.0%、57.1%、60%,诊断符合率分别为90.32%、70.96%、58.6%。结论 TIC对诊断乳腺癌的敏感度和符合率比DWI、MRS更高。因此TIC对诊断乳腺癌最具价值。 Objective To assess and compare the diagnostic value of signal intensity time course, DWI and MRS in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods Thirty-one patients with breast cancer were recruited. Thirty-one patients underwent dynamic contrast enhancement MRI, DWI(b= 1 000s/ram2) and 1H-MRS scan. The diagnosis of the 31 patients were confirmed by pathology. They were divided into 3 groups: 25 Intraductal carcinoma, 4 papillary carcinoma, 2 mucus ade- nocareinoma. Using integral method and statistics, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Signal intensity time course, DWI and MRS in the diagnosis of breast cancer were compared. Results The sensitivity of signal intensity time course, DWI and MRS for diagnosis of breast cancer was 96.6%, 91.6%, 85.7% respectively, specificity was 50.0%, 57.1%, 60% respectively, and accuracy was 90.32%, 70.96%, 58.6% respectively. Conclusion The sensitivity and accuracy of signal intensity time course was higher in the diagnosis of breast cancer than DWI and MRS. Therefore, the signal intensi- ty time course was most meaningful for the diagnosis of breast cancer.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2012年第12期2043-2046,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 乳腺癌 时间-信号强度曲线 磁共振扩散加权成像 Breast cancer Signal intensity time course Diffusion-weighted imaging Magnetic resonance spectroscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Glunde kJie C, Bhuiwalla ZM. Molecular causes of the ab- berant choline phospholipid metabolism in breast cancer [J]. Cancer Res, 2004, 64: 4270-4276.
  • 2Bartella L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. Proton MR spec- troscopy with choline peak as malignancy marker improves positive predictive value for breast breast cancer diagnosis [J]. Radiology, 2006, 239: 686-692.
  • 3Stanwell P, Gluch L, Clark D, et al. Specificity of choline metabolites for in vivo diagnosis of breast cancer using 1 H- MRS at 1.5T [J]. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15.. 1037-1043.
  • 4Imamura T, Isomoto I, Sueyoshi E, et al. Diagnostic per- formance of ADC for non-mass-like breast lesions on MR im- aging [J]. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2010, 9: 217-225.
  • 5Tamura T, Usui S, Murakami S, et al. Biexponential signal attenuation analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast [J]. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2010, 9: 195-207.
  • 6陈欣,张毅力,张秋娟,郭佑民,赵暹,白芝兰.MR扩散加权成像对乳腺病变良恶性鉴别的Meta分析报告[J].中华放射学杂志,2008,42(6):582-585. 被引量:18
  • 7赵斌,蔡世峰,高佩虹,彭洪娟.MR扩散加权成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):497-500. 被引量:147
  • 8周长玉,李苏建,卢光明,唐晓俊.动态增强磁共振成像对乳腺癌的诊断[J].医学影像学杂志,2004,14(2):132-135. 被引量:9
  • 9郭勇,蔡祖龙,蔡幼铨,陈凛,马林,高元桂,梁艳.动态增强MRI鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的前瞻性研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2001,35(9):671-675. 被引量:52

二级参考文献30

共引文献211

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部