期刊文献+

培美曲塞腹腔用药对H22腹水瘤小鼠腹水抑制作用的实验研究 被引量:2

Intraperitoneal perfusion of pemetrexed on malignant ascites of H22 ascites-bearing mice model
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨培美曲塞腹腔用药对荷H22肝癌腹水瘤昆明小鼠的疗效与安全性。方法:制备恶性腹水模型,造模24h后随机分为空白对照组(生理盐水)和培美曲塞低、中、高剂量组〔10、50和90 mg/(kg.d)〕以及顺铂组〔0.6mg/(kg.d)〕5组,每组18只。分组后给予各药物连续10d腹腔内注射治疗。每天用药前测量小鼠的体质量、腹围,并观察小鼠日常活动状态。用药结束24h后(第11天)各组处死8只小鼠测量腹水量,并解剖小鼠观察腹腔脏器及肺脏的转移情况。流式细胞仪检测腹水中H22细胞凋亡率。其余剩下小鼠观察其生存时间,计算生命延长率。结果:培美曲塞腹腔用药可改善荷瘤小鼠生存质量。培美曲塞低、中、高剂量组及顺铂组小鼠腹水量分别为(15.05±3.95)、(10.93±3.05)、(8.08±2.22)和(7.30±2.32)mL,较空白对照组(17.85±2.56)mL减少,其中培美曲塞中、高剂量组及顺铂组与空白对照组比较,差异有统计学意义,P<0.01。培美曲塞腹腔用药可减少荷瘤小鼠脏器转移。培美曲塞低、中、高剂量组及顺铂组小鼠平均生存时间分别为(14.30±2.26)、(15.70±1.89)、(20.10±5.90)及(19.1±3.21)d,较空白对照组(13.20±1.93)d有不同程度延长,生命延长率分别为8.33%、18.94%、52.27%和44.70%,其中培美曲塞中、高剂量组及顺铂组与空白对照组相比,小鼠生命延长差异有统计学意义,P<0.01。培美曲塞低、中、高剂量组和顺铂组小鼠腹水中H22细胞凋亡率分别为(1.81±0.76)%、(3.63±1.19)%、(8.85±1.86)%和(7.68±2.17)%,均高于空白对照组的(0.73±0.23)%,差异均有统计学意义,P<0.01。结论:培美曲塞腹腔用药治疗荷H22腹水瘤具有较好的疗效,并且在补给叶酸后安全性好,其机制可能与培美曲塞诱导鼠肝癌H22细胞凋亡相关。 OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effect and safety of intraperitoneal administration of pemetrexed on H22 as cites -bearing mice. METHODS:Mice model of ascites were established and divided into 5 groups (18 per group)at random after 24 h inoculation : normal control group (normal saline) ; pemetrexed low, middle, high dose group [pemetrexed 10,50, 90 mg/(kg · d)]; cisplatin group [DDP,0.6 mg/(kg · d)]. Mice were treated with i. p. injection of each drug on day 1- 10 day (i. p. ,qd× 10). The bodyweights,abdomen circumference and behavior of the mice were measured every day be fore treatment. Eight mice of each group were sacrificed and surveyed ascites volumes on the llth day. Also, H22 cells in ascites were checked the apoptosis rates by flow cytometry. The rest mice were checked the survival days,and calculated the life-prolonging rate. RESULTS: Intraperitoneal administration of pemetrexed could improve the quality of life of the H22 ascites -bearing mice. The Mean volume of ascites of PEM low,middle,high dose group,and DDP group were (15.05 ±3.95) ,(10.93±_3.05) ,(8.08±2.22) and (7.30±2.32) mL. The ascites volume were lower as compared to normal control group (17.85± 2.56) mL. Especially, the most significant were pemetrexed middle, high dose group, DDP group (P〈0.01). Intraperitoneal administration of pemetrexed could reduce the rate of metastasis. The mean survival days of pemetrexed low, middle, high dose group, and DDP group were (14. 30 ± 2. 26), (15. 70± 1. 89), (20. 10 ± 5.90)and (19.1±3.21 ) d, prolonged compared with the mean survival days of the control group(13.20±1.93) d. Life-prolon- ging rate were 8.33% ,18.94G ,52.27G and 44.70G. The most significant were pemetrexed middle,high dose group, DDP group (P〈0.01). The apoptosis rates of H22 cells in pemetrexed low,middle,high dose group,and DDP group were (1. 81±0.76)%, (3.63±1.19)%, (8.85± 1.86)% and (7.68±2.17)% ,respectively. Compared with the control group (0.73± 0.23) %, there were statistically significant (P〈 0.01). CONCLUSIONS : Intraperitoneal pemetrexed administra- tion on H22 ascites-bearing mice has good therapeutic effect,and also safe after supplement folic acid in KM mice. The mechanism might be related to induce murine hepatoma H22 cells to apoptosis.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第23期1780-1784,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
基金 广西卫生厅重点科研课题(重200869)
关键词 培美曲塞 腹水 腹腔 药物疗法 疾病模型 动物 细胞凋亡 小鼠 pemetrexed ascites abdominal cavity drug therapy disease models,animal apoptosis mice
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Ayantunde AA, Parsons SL. Pattern and prognostic [actors in patients with malignant ascites: a retrospective studyFJ]. Ann Oncol,2007,18(5) :945-949.
  • 2Becker G,Galandi D,Blum HE. Malignant ascites : systematic re- view and guideline for treatmentFJ]. Eur J Cancer, 2006,42(5): 589-597.
  • 3Worzalla JF,Shih C,Schultz RM. Role of folic acid in modula- ting the toxicity and efficacy of the multitargeted antifolate, LY231514[J]. Anticancer Res, 1998,18(5A) : 3235-3239.
  • 4郑鸿,陶莉,张文.培美曲塞单药治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌复治患者的临床观察[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2010,17(20):1679-1680. 被引量:9
  • 5张冠中,焦顺昌.培美曲塞治疗非小细胞肺癌的研究进展[J].山东医药,2011,51(15):113-114. 被引量:36
  • 6王西艳.非小细胞肺癌的维持治疗进展[J].山东医药,2010,50(21):101-102. 被引量:2
  • 7Pestieau SR, Stuart OA, Sugarbaker PH. Multi-targeted anti{o late (MTA) pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal administration in a rat model[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2000,26(7).-696-700.
  • 8孙阳,刘佳华.妇科常见肿瘤中细胞自噬现象的研究进展[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2011,18(3):233-236. 被引量:8
  • 9Buque A, Muhialdin JS, Munoz A, et al. Molecular mechanism implicated in pemetrexedinduced apoptosis in human melanoma eells[J]. Mol Cancer,2012,11(1) :25.
  • 10Bareford M D, Hamed H A, Tang Y, et al. Sorafenib enhances pemetrexed eytotoxieity through an autophagy dependent mech- anism in cancer cells[J]. Autophagy,2011,7(10) :1261-1262.

二级参考文献43

  • 1Zhao R, Qiu A,Tsai E, et al. The proton-coupled folale transporter: impact on pometrexed transport and on antifolates activities compared with the reduced folate carrier[ J]. Mol Pharm, 2008,74 (3) :854- 862.
  • 2Baldwin CM,Perry CM. Pemetrexed:a review of its use in the management d advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Drugs ,2009,69(16) :2279-2302.
  • 3Chattoopadhyay S,Moran RG, Goldman ID. Pemetrexed:biochemical and cellular pharmacologymechanismsand clinical applications [ J ]. Mol Cancer,2007,6 (2) :404-417.
  • 4Celli AC, Rothbart SB, Heyer CL, et al. Therapeutics by cytotoxic metabolite accumulation:pemetrexed causes ZMP accumulation- AMPK activation and mammalian target or rapamycin inhibition[J]. Cancer Res,2009,69 ( 13 ) :5467-5474.
  • 5Latz JE, Karlsson MO, Rusthoven JJ, et al. A semimechanistic-physiologic population Phannacokinetic/pharmacodynamlc model for neutropenia follow/ng pemetrexed therapy[ J]. Cancor Chemothor Pharmacol,2006,57 (4) :412-426.
  • 6Gridelli C, Kaukel E, Gregore V, et al. Single-agent pemetrexed or sequential pemetrexed/gemcltabine as frontoline treatment of advanced non-small ceU lung cancer in elderly patients or patients ineligible for phase II platinum-based chemotherapy: a trial[J]. J Thorac Oneol,2007,2(3) :221-229.
  • 7Tucker S. The role of pemetrexed in second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small eel] lung cancer[J]. Curr Drug Targets ,2010, 11(1) :58-60.
  • 8Secagliotti G, Hanna N, Fossella F, et al. The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology: a review of two Phase III stodies[J].Oncologist ,2009,14(3 ) :253-263.
  • 9Ciuleanu T, Bwdowicz T, Zielinski C, et al. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomiseddot [ J]. Lancet,2009,374(9699) :1432-1440. 3 study.
  • 10Scagliotfi GV,Parikh P,von Pawel J,et al. Phase m study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-smail-cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(21 ) :3543-3551.

共引文献50

同被引文献24

  • 1Smith EM, Jayson GC. The current and future management of malignant ascites [J]. Ciin Oncol (R Coil Radiol) ,2003,15 (2) :59-72.
  • 2Xu HX, Huang XE, Qian ZY, et al. Clinical observation of Endostar combined with chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2011, 12(11) :3087-3090.
  • 3Xu R, Ma N, Wang F,et al. Results of a random ized and controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with Endostar and S-1 combined with oxaliplatin in advanced gastric cancer [J]. Onco Targets Ther , 2013,6:925-929.
  • 4Su A, Zhang J, Pan ZH,et al. Salvage therapy of gemcitahine plus endostar significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) withplatinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Asi an Pac J Cancer Prey,2013,14(3) :1841-1846.
  • 5Becker G, Galandi D, Blum HE. Malignant ascites: systematic review and guideline for treatment[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2006, 42(5): 589-597.
  • 6Hanai J ,Gloy J ,Karumanehi SA,et al. Endostatin is a potential inibitor of Wnt signaling[J]. J Cell Biol, 2002,158(3) : 529-539.
  • 7Kim YM, Hwang S, Kim YM, et al. Endostatin blocks vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated signaling via direct interaction with KDR/Fik-1 [J]. J Biol Chem, 2002,277(31):27872-27879.
  • 8Lee SJ,Jang JW,Kim YM, et al. Endostatin binds to the catalytic domain of matrix metalloproteinase- 2[J]. FEBS lett, 2002,519(1/2/3):147-152.
  • 9魏红梅,秦叔逵,殷晓进,陈亚利.新型重组人血管内皮抑制素对小鼠腹水瘤的作用特点探讨[J].南方医科大学学报,2010,30(7):1509-1513. 被引量:34
  • 10刘秀峰,秦叔逵,王琳,陈映霞,华海清,杨宁蓉,黄勇,龚新雷.重组人血管内皮抑素治疗恶性浆膜腔积液的临床研究[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2011,16(9):800-804. 被引量:33

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部