期刊文献+

下肢动脉硬化性闭塞症介入治疗的回顾性分析 被引量:2

Interventional Revascularization of the Lower Limbs Arteriosclerosis Obliterans: A Retrospective Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析下肢动脉硬化性闭塞症(arteriosclerosis obliterans,ASO)介入治疗的临床疗效和通畅率。方法从2009年10月到2011年7月,32例(39条下肢)下肢ASO患者在上海交通大学附属第六人民医院行介入治疗。回顾性分析32例ASO患者的血管造影图像,根据病变长度和程度分级。对手术成功患者随访,随访期3~16个月,平均随访期(8.7±1.9)个月。随访期内每3个月进行一次下肢MRA或CTA检查,并搜集相关临床资料。结果技术成功率93%,踝肱指数(ankle-brachial index,ABI)从术前的0.47±0.11提高至术后的0.68±0.02,在随访期末20例取得了稳定疗效,总的通畅率为77%,保肢率为97%。结论介入治疗ASO安全可行,取得了良好的临床效果及通畅率,其长期疗效尚需进一步观察。 Objective To retrospectively evaluated the clinical efficacy of interventional revascularization for lower limbs arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO). Methods From Oct 2009 to July 2011,32 patients (39 limbs) with lower limbs ASO performed interventional revascularization in our center. Angiography was retrospectively analyzed, and every lesion categorized and classified according to its length and severity. The mean follow up period was 3 - 162 months, mean 8.7 _+ 1.9 months. Lower limb magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) was per- formed every 3 months during follow-up. The clinical data were collected. Results 93% technical success rate was ob- tained. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) improved from 0. 47 + 0. 11 to 0.68 ± 0.02. At the end of follow up, 20 patients maintained a stable outcome, gained a 77% patency rate and 97% limb salvage rate. Conclusion Interventional revascu- larization is safe and feasible in the treatment of lower limbs ASO. With encouraging clinical outcome and patency rate, fur- ther research is warranted to evaluate long-term outcome.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期1772-1776,共5页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 上海市科委医学引导项目(编号:10411966700)
关键词 下肢 动脉硬化性闭塞症 内膜下成形术 介入治疗 Lower extremity Arteriosclerosis obliterans Subintimal angioplasty Interventional treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, et al. Bypass versus angioplasty inn severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL) : multicentre, randomized controlled triM. Lancet. 2005.366 : 1925.
  • 2Bradbury A, Wilmink T, Lee A J, et al. Bypass versus angioplasty to treat severe limb ischemia: Factors that affect treatment preferences of UK surgeons and interventional radiologists. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 39:1026.
  • 3Met R, Van Lieden KP, Koelemay M J, et al. Subintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease:a systematic review. Cardio- vasc Intervent Radiol, 2008,31:687.
  • 4徐克,于世平,苏洪英,张曦彤,赵钟春,冯博,钟红珊.主-髂-股动脉闭塞性病变介入治疗的技术探讨及疗效观察[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(4):383-387. 被引量:51
  • 5Wang JB, Zhao JG, Li MH, et al. An effective guidewire looping tech- nique for the recanalization of occlusive segments of infrapopliteal vessels. Korean J Radiol,2010,11:441.
  • 6王珏,吴正阳,朱悦琦,赵俊功,王建波,程英升,李明华,王武,张培蕾.使用长球囊行膝下血管成形术治疗糖尿病严重下肢缺血的回顾性分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2011,20(3):191-195. 被引量:24
  • 7顾建平,楼文胜,徐克.加强下肢动脉硬化闭塞症介入治疗的研究[J].介入放射学杂志,2011,20(10):757-759. 被引量:23
  • 8楼文胜,顾建平,何旭,陈亮,陈国平,苏浩波,宋进华,汪涛,徐克.内膜下成形术治疗股浅动脉长段闭塞[J].介入放射学杂志,2011,20(10):773-777. 被引量:8
  • 9Markose G, Miller FC, Bolia A. Subintimal angioplasty for femoro- popliteal occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg,2010,52:1410.
  • 10Sidhu R, Pigott J, Pigott M, et al. Subintimal angioplasty for advanced lower extremity ischemia due to TASC II C and D lesions of the su- perficial femoral artery. Vasc Endovascular Surg,2010 ,44 :633.

二级参考文献37

  • 1GU Yong-quan ZHANG Jian QI Li-xing YU Heng-xi LI Jian-xin LI Xue-feng GUO Lian-rui LUO Tao CUI Shi-jun WANG Zhong-gao.Surgical treatment of 82 patients with diabetic lower limb ischemia by distal arterial bypass[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2007(2):106-109. 被引量:17
  • 2Houston JG,Bhat R,Ross R,et al.Long-term results after placement of aortic bifurcation self-expanding stents:10 year mortality,stent restenosis,and distal disease progression[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2007,30:42-47.
  • 3Norgren L,Hiatt WR,Dormandy JA,et al.Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease[J].J Vasc Surg,2007,26:81-157.
  • 4Mark GC.李龙,译.血管介入放射学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2008:49-60.
  • 5Catalano C,Fraioli F,Laghi A,et al.Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease:diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography[J].Radiology,2004,231:555-563.
  • 6Perrio S,Holt PJ,Patterson BO,et al.Role of superficial femoral artery stents in the management of arterial occlusive disease:review of current evidence[J].Vascular,2010,18:82-92.
  • 7Tsetis D,Uberoi R.Quality improvement guidelines for endova-scular treatment of iliac artery occlusive disease[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2008,31:238-245.
  • 8Cejna M.Cutting balloon:review on principles and background of use in peripheral arteries[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2005,28:400-408.
  • 9Fava M,Loyola S,Polydorou A,et al.Cryoplasty for femoropo-pliteal arterial disease:late angiographic results of initial human experience[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol,2004,15:1239-1243.
  • 10Ahmadi R,Schillinger M,Maca T,et al.Femoropopliteal arteries:immediate and long-term results with a Dacron-covered stent-graft[J].Radiology,2002,223:345-350.

共引文献100

同被引文献32

  • 1徐克,于世平,苏洪英,张曦彤,赵钟春,冯博,钟红珊.主-髂-股动脉闭塞性病变介入治疗的技术探讨及疗效观察[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(4):383-387. 被引量:51
  • 2中国中医药学会脉管专业委员会.周围血管病中医研究最新全书[M].北京:中国中医药科技出版社,1992:354-357.
  • 3Hynes N , Akhtar Y, Manning B, et al. Subintimal angioplasty as a primary modality in the management of critical limb ischemia: com?parison to bypass grafting for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal occlusive disease. J Endovasc Ther ,2004,11 :460.
  • 4Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Ceken K, et al. Subintimal recanalization of long superlicial femoral artery occlusions through the retrograde popliteal approach. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ,2001,24: 154.
  • 5Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, et al. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised con- trolled trial. Lancet, 2005 ,366 : 1925.
  • 6Bradbury A, Wilmink T, Lee AJ, et al. Bypass versus angioplasty to treat severe limb ischemia: Factors that affect treatment preferences of UK surgeons and interventional radiologists. J Vase Surg, 2004 , 39:1026.
  • 7Laxdal E, Jenssen GL, Pedersen G, et al. Subintimal angioplasty as a treatment of femoropopliteal artery occlusions. Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg,2003,25:578.
  • 8Cejna M, Thurnher S, Illiasch H, et al. PTA versus Palmaz stent placement in femoropopliteal artery obstructions: a multicenter pro?spective randomized study. J Vasc Interv Radiol ,2001,12 :23.
  • 9Grenacher L,Saam T ,Geier A,et al. PTA versus Palmaz stent place?ment in femoropopliteal artery stenoses: results of a multicenter pro?spective randomized study (REFSA). Rofo,2004, 176: 1302.
  • 10Antusevas A, Aleksynas N, Kaupsa RS, et al. Comparison of results of subintimal angioplasty and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in superlicial femoral artery occulusions. Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg, 2008,36: 101.

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部