期刊文献+

根管治疗一次法与两次法的近期疼痛与远期疗效对比研究 被引量:6

Comparative study of short-term pain and long-term follow-up result after single-visit root canal therapy and secondary-visit root canal therapy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨根管治疗一次法与根管治疗两次法治疗慢性根尖周炎临床疗效差异。方法选择2009年6月~2011年6月来河南科技大学附属黄河医院口腔科和武汉大学口腔医学院口腔科就诊的慢性根尖周炎患112例,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组各56例,对照组患者给予根管治疗两次法治疗,观察组患者给予根管治疗一次法,比较两组患者近期疼痛和远期疗效。结果观察组患者近期疼痛疗效和远期疗效均明显优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论根管治疗一次法治疗慢性根尖周炎临床疗效确切,近期疼痛疗效与远期疗效均优于根管治疗两次法,值得进一步推广。 Objective To investigate the differences of short-term pain and long-term follow-up result after single-visit root canal therapy and secondary-visit root canal therapy.Methods 112 cases of chronic periapical periodontitis in affiliated yellow river hospital of He′nan university of science and technology and college of stomatology Wuhan university from June 2009 to June 2011 were collected and divided into control group and observation group with 56 cases in each group.Patients in control group were given secondary-visit root canal therapy,patients in observation group were recieved single-visit root canal therapy,the short-term pain and long-term follow-up result after single-visit root canal therapy and secondary-visit root canal therapy were evaluated.Results The short-term pain and long-term follow-up result in the observation group were found superior than those in the control group,the differences were all statistically significant(all P 0.05).Conclusion The short-term pain and long-term follow-up result after single-visit root canal therapy can obtain satisfactory curative effect for patients with chronic periapical periodontitis,and it is safe and reliable.It is worthy of clinical application.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2012年第33期34-35,共2页 China Medical Herald
基金 国家自然科学基金(30973314)
关键词 根管治疗 慢性根尖周炎 疼痛 远期疗效 Root canal therapy Chronic periapical periodontitis Pain Long-term follow-up result
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献55

共引文献105

同被引文献48

  • 1樊明文.牙体牙髓病学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:255-257.
  • 2Albashaireh Z, Alnegrish A. Postobturation pain after single-and multiple-visit endodontic therapy. A prospective study [J].J Dent,1998,26(3):227-232.
  • 3任忠宝,任飞雪,马兰,等.露髓牙齿根管治疗一次法与多次法的临床效果分析[J].中外健康文摘,2012,9(27):244.
  • 4Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. Australian endodontists' perceptions of single and multiple visit root canal treatment. Int EndodJ, 2009, 42(9): 811-818.
  • 5Vera J, Siqueira IF Jr, Ricucci D, et al. One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study. JEndod, 2012, 38(8): 1040-1052.
  • 6Kvist T, Molander A, Dahl4n G, et al. Microbiological evaluation of one- and two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized, clinical trial. ] Endod, 2004, 30(8): 572- 576.
  • 7Xavier AC, Martinho FC, Chung A, et al. One-visit versus two-visit root canal treatment: effectiveness in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria. J Endod, 2013, 39(8): 959-964.
  • 8Goldfein J, Speirs C, Hnkelman M, et al. Rubber dam use during post placement influences the success of root canal-treated teeth. J Endod, 2013, 39(12): 1481-1484.
  • 9AAE Special Committee to Develop a Microscope Position Paper. AAE Position Statement. Use of microscopes and other magnification techniques. ] Endod, 2012, 38(8): 1153-1155.
  • 10Parekh V, Taluja C. Comparative study of periapical radiographic techniques with apex locator for endodontic working length estimation: an ex vivo study. ] Contemp Dent Pract, 2011, 12(2): 131- 134.

引证文献6

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部