期刊文献+

多发性骨髓瘤细胞形态分型与流式细胞术检测抗原表达相关性研究 被引量:4

Correlation between morphological classification and flow cytometry immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨流式细胞术检测技术在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的诊断意义。方法收集山西医科大学第二临床医学院2009年01月至2011年12月门诊及住院的MM患者28例,检测骨髓瘤细胞表面的免疫表型,分析其表达率与骨髓瘤细胞形态特征及预后相关检测指标的关系。流式抗原表达数、骨髓细胞数组间差异采用卡方和秩和检验。结果流式细胞分析应用CD45/SSC配合CD38+/CD138+设门证实MM患者可疑瘤细胞比例为4.0﹪~75.4﹪,形态学检查骨髓瘤细胞比例在为8.0﹪~83.5﹪,骨髓瘤细胞CD138、CD38、CD56、CD19抗原阳性表达比例分别为95.5﹪、89.3﹪、53.6﹪、7.1﹪(c2=54.343,P=0.000)。结论 CD45/SSC配合CD38+/CD138+设门技术可以较准确地设定需要分析的MM细胞群;幼稚浆细胞型骨髓瘤易见到CD56阳性表达,流式细胞分析技术与形态学相结合,更有助于MM诊断及鉴别诊断。 Objective To compare the efficiency of flow cytometry and morphological classification of bone marrow smears in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma(MM).Methods Twenty-eight confirmed MM patients were enrolled.MM cells surface antigens were detected using flow cytometry.The relationship between surface antigen expressions and cell morphological characteristics and laboratory prognosis indices were analyzed.Results Using CD45/SSC and CD38+/CD138+ as markers for MM cells,4.0﹪-75.4﹪ of bone marrow cells were MM cells.In comparision,8.0﹪-83.5﹪ cells were considered to be MM cells using morphological examination.The percentages of CD138,CD38,CD56,CD19 positive cells were 95.5﹪,89.3﹪,53.6﹪,7.0﹪ respectively(c2 = 54.343,P = 0.000).Conclusions The use of CD45/SSC with CD38+/CD138+ gating technique can identify multiple myeloma cells,and more immature myeloma cells were seen in the CD56 positive cells.Flow cytometry combined with morphology was helpful to the diagnosis and differentiated diagnosis of multiple myeloma.
出处 《中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版)》 2012年第2期24-27,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition)
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 流式细胞术 形态 抗原 Multiple myeloma Flow cytometry Morphology Antigens
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1陶中飞,傅卫军,陈玉宝,袁振刚,王东星,侯健.206例多发性骨髓瘤预后因素分析及分期评价[J].癌症,2006,25(4):461-464. 被引量:45
  • 2Greipp PR, Raymond NM,Kyle RA,et al. Mutiple myeloma:Signifieance of plasmablastic subtype in morphological classification[J].Blood, 1985, 65(2):305-310.
  • 3Greipp PR, Leong T, Bennett JM, et al. Plasmablasticmorphology: An independent prognostic factor with clinical and laboratory correlates-Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) myeloma trial E9486 report by the ECOG Myeloma Laboratory Group[J]. Blood, 1998, 91(7):2501-2507.
  • 4Garcia-SanzR, Orfao A, GonzalezM, et al. Primary plasma cell leukemia: clinical immunophenotypic, DNA ploidy and cytogenetic characteristics[J]. Blood, 1999, 93(3): 1032-1037.
  • 5Seeqmiller AC, Xu Y, McKenna RW, et al. Immunophenotypic differentiation between neoplastic plasma ceils in mature B-Cell lymphoma vs plasma cell myeloma[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2007, 127(2):176-181.
  • 6Sahara N, Takeshita A. Prognostic significance of surface markers expressed in multiple myeloma: CD56 and other antigens[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2004, 45(1 ): 61-65.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Myeloma Trialists' Collaborative Group.Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan plus prednisone as treatment for multiple myeloma:an overview of 6,633 patients from 27randomized trials[J].J Clin Oncol,1998,16(12):3832-3842.
  • 2Clerc D,Fermand J P,Mariette X.Treatment of multiple myeloma[J].Joint Bone Spine,2003,70(3):175-186.
  • 3Turesson I,Abildgaard N,Ahlgren T,et al.Prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma:an analysis of the impact of new prognostic factors[J].Br J Haematol,1999,106(4):1005-1012.
  • 4Bataille R,Boccadoro M,Klein B,et al.C-reactive protein and beta-2 microglobulin produce a simple and powerful myeloma staging system[J].Blood,1992,80 (3):733-737.
  • 5Greipp P R,San Miguel J,Durie B G,et al.International staging system for multiple myeloma[J].J Clin Oncol,2005,23 (15):3412-3420.
  • 6Pruzanski W.Clinical manifestations of multiple myeloma:relation to class and type M component[J].Can Med Assoc J,1976,114(10):896-897.
  • 7Jacobson J L,Hussein M A,Barlogie B,et al.A new staging system for multiple myeloma patients based on the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) experience[J].BrJ Haematol,2003,122(3):441-450.
  • 8Bataille R,Durie B G,Grenier J,et al.Prognostic factors and staging in multiple myeloma:a reappraisal[J].J Clin Oncol,1986,4(1):80-87.

共引文献44

同被引文献39

  • 1孙峰,刘红,陈秀芳,曹海峰,尹红.骨髓活检在多发性骨髓瘤诊断及鉴别诊断中的价值[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2008,28(2):106-107. 被引量:9
  • 2黄春妮,李山,秦雪.流式细胞术测定多发性骨髓瘤细胞表面标记的研究[J].广西医学,2007,29(7):953-956. 被引量:9
  • 3贾菲.造血与淋巴组织肿瘤病理学和遗传学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:198-199.
  • 4Rawstron AC. Immunophenotyping of plasma cells [ J ]. Curr Protoc Cytom, 2006, 6: 23.
  • 5Raja KR, Kovarova L, Hajek R. Review of phenotypic markers used in flow cytometric analysis of MGUS and MM, and applicability of flow cytometry in other plasma cell disorders [ J ]. Br J Haematol, 2010, 149: 334-351.
  • 6Robillard N, Bn MC, Moreau P, et al. A single-tube muldparameter seven-colour flow cytometry strategy, for the detection of malignant plasma cells in multiple myeloma [ J ]. Blood Cancer J, 2013, 3 : e134.
  • 7Rawstron AC, Orfao A, Beksac M, et al. Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders [ J ]. Haematologica, 2008, 93 : 431-438.
  • 8GuptaR, Bhaskar A, Kumar L, et al. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping and minimal residual diseaseanalysis in multiple myeloma[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2009, 132: 728-732.
  • 9Cho YU, Park CJ, Park SJ, et al. Immunophenotypic characterization and quantification of neoplastic bone marrow plasma cells by multiparametric flow eytometry and its clinical significance in Korean myeloma patients [ J ]. J Korean Med Sci, 2013, 28: 542-549.
  • 10Sahara N, Takeshita A, Shigeno K, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of CD56 negative multiple myeloma[ J]. Br J Haematol, 2002, 117: 882-885.

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部