期刊文献+

SLIPA喉罩与气管插管全麻用于腹腔镜妇科手术的观察比较 被引量:2

Comparison of general anesthesia with SLIPA laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation for laparoscopic gynecological surgery
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较SLIPA喉罩和气管插管用于全麻腹腔镜下妇科手术的安全性及对血流动力学的影响。方法 66例患者随机分为SLIPA喉罩(A组)和气管插管(B组),实时记录两组麻醉诱导前(T1)、罩(管)置入成功即刻(T2)、罩(管)置入后3 min(T3)、罩(管)拔除前(T4)、罩(管)拔除即刻(T5)、罩(管)拔除后3 min(T6)的SBP、DBP、HR及SpO2的变化,并记录两组并发症情况。结果与T0时比较,B组T1、T4、T5时SBP、DBP明显升高,HR增快,且相应时点均高于A组(P<0.05);B组发生躁动、呛咳、咽痛的患者明显多于A组(P<0.05)。结论 SLIPA喉罩用于全麻腹腔镜下妇科手术时患者血流动力学稳定、术后咽喉部并发症少。 Objective To compare the effects of SLIPA laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation on safety and hemody- namics for laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Methods All of 66 cases were randomly divided into SLIPA laryngeal mask group (group A) and endotracheal intubation group (group B); SBP, DBP, HR, SpO2 were recorded before intubation induc- tion of anesthesia (T1), cover (tube) into successful immediate (T2), cover (tube) in 3 min (T3), cover (tube) extraction (T4), before the cover (tube) removed instantly (T5) and cover (tube) after extraction of 3 min (T6), and recorded two groups:of complications situation. Results In group B, SBP, DBP and HR at T1, T4, T5 were higher than those at TO and the same time points in group A (P 〈 0.05); Compared with group A,the incidences of body movement, coughing and sore throat of group B were much higher (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion SLIPA laryngeal mask airway in general anesthesia during laparoscopic gynecological operation has hemodynamic stability and less postoperative throat complications.
作者 陈小汉
出处 《中国现代医生》 2012年第36期77-78,共2页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 SLIPA喉罩 气管插管 腹腔镜手术 血流动力学 并发症 SLIPA laryngeal mask Endotracheal intubation Laparoscopic surgery Hemodynamics Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献22

  • 1郑颖,连文洁,汪春英,张爱萍,张马忠,黄贞玲,杭燕南.喉罩与气管插管用于全麻乳腺癌根治术的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(4):288-290. 被引量:119
  • 2肖全胜,郑清民,姚伟瑜,李群杰,李师阳.七氟醚复合丙泊酚麻醉诱导用于小儿喉罩置入的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(4):337-338. 被引量:42
  • 3岳云,主译.喉罩麻醉-原理与实践.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:579-580.
  • 4Wrobel M,Grundmann U,Wilhelm W,et al.Laryngeal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetised non-paralysed patients:a comparison of handling and postoperative morbidity.Anaesthesist,2004,53:702-708.
  • 5Moon RE.Respiratory monitoring//Miller RD,ed.Anesthesia.New York:Churchill Livingstone,2001:1255-1295.
  • 6Puri GD,Hegde HV,Jayant A,et al.Haemodynamie and Bispectral index response to insertion of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway(SLIPA):comparison with the laryngeal mask airway.Anaesth Intensive Care,2008,36:404-410.
  • 7Timmermaim A,Creiner S,Heuer J,et al.Laiyngeal mask LMA Supreme.Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway management.Anaesthesist,2008,57(10):970-975.
  • 8Eschertzhuber S,Brimacombe J,Hohlrieder M,et al.The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent.A randomised,cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed,anaesthetised patients.Anaesthesia,2009,64(1):79-83.
  • 9Verghese C,Ramaswamy B.LMA-Supreme-a new single-use LMA with gastric access:a report on its clinical efficacy.Br J Anaesth,2008,101(3):405-410.
  • 10Brimacombe JR.喉罩麻醉原理与实践.岳云,田鸣,左明章,译.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:86.

共引文献128

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部