摘要
国内学术界关于思想政治教育本质的阐论虽未达成一致却已形成三种基本观点。倘若要科学求解思想政治教育本质,那就必须首先逻辑地追问:"本质"的内涵、"思想政治教育"的界定、"思想政治教育本质"的概念,在这些追问的基础上还应择取并运用正确的探寻路径,这样的路径必须立足于思想政治教育的范畴:起源演进、客观实践、特殊矛盾、根本规律、现象表征、本质属性、基本内容、主要功能、对象指称、自身品格。根植于上述逻辑追问和探寻路径遂得出下列结论:思想政治教育本质必定是"一元"的,思想政治教育是一种特殊的治理活动;思想政治教育本质应当是"立体"的,它可以被划分为四个"质级"。
Although no consensus is reached on the nature of ideological and political education among Chinese scholars, three basic ideas have been formed. The authors hold that before a scientific interpretation of the nature of ideological and political education can be made, three logical questions must be raised about the connotation of ＂nature＂, the definition of ＂ideological and political education＂, and ＂the nature of ideological and political education＂ as a concept. In addition, the right path of ideological and political education should be chosen and explored. The path should cover the categories of evolution of origin, objective practice, special contradiction, the fundamental law, phenomenon of characterization, essential attributes, basic contents, major functions, target subjects; and its own characters as well. Based on the logical questions and explorations of the path discussed above, the following conclusions are reached. The nature of ideological and political education must be unitary, indicating that it is a special administrative activity. The nature of ideological and political education should also be three-dimensional and be divided into four qualitative levels.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第12期61-67,共7页
Teaching and Research
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"社会主义价值与社会主义核心价值体系的内在关联研究"(项目号:12AKS005)的阶段性成果
关键词
思想政治教育本质
学界观点
逻辑追问
探寻路径
质级论证
nature of ideological and political education
the academic view
logical questioning
exploration of the path
argumentation of qualitative level
