期刊文献+

神经危重症患者拔除气管插管影响因素的研究 被引量:11

Research on relevant factors affecting results of extubation of trachea cannula in neurocritical carepatients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究影响神经危重症患者拔除气管插管成功率的相关因素。方法本研究为回顾性、描述性研究。纳入2008年12月至2011年2月,南方医院神经内科重症监护病房收治的40名因中枢神经系统疾病需行气管插管,且插管时间大于6h的患者。排除了资料不完整,及治疗无效或脑死亡或个别拔除气管插管后立即行气管切开的患者。按拔管是否成功分为两组。比较两组患者拔除气管插管前的基本临床资料、呼吸参数、24h出入量、痰液情况、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)及四分法评分(Four Scale)之间的差异,采用SPSS13.0统计软件分析处理数据。结果GCS评分及Four评分在拔管成功及拔管失败两组患者中差异具有统计学意义(P均〈0.05),且在评估拔管结果时效能差异具有统计学意义(P=0.012),并与插管结果存在显著相关性(P=0.041),发生癫痫在两组间差异亦有统计学意义。而其他因素对于预测拔管能否成功暂无统计学意义。结论本研究表明,GCS评分及Four评分对于预测神经危重症患者拔管能否成功存在意义,而患者的人口学数据及常用呼吸参数及痰液性状、痰液量、24h出入量等在传统拔管指征基础上的分级研究对于预测拔管能否成功暂无明确意义。而其他因素对NICU患者,能否起到预测拔管失败的作用,尚需要更多前瞻性、随机对照研究的进行。 Objective To Explored the relative factors which caused the extubation failure in neurological intensive care unit (NICU). Methods It was a retrospective study . 40 cases of patients who met the criteria, were brought into statistical analysis . They were admitted in NICU in Nan Fang Hospital from December 2008 to February 2011 . The name, sex, age, diagnosis, respiratory parameters, 24 hours discrepancy quantity, sputum, and Glasgow Coma Scale, Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Scale were recorded. SPSS 13.0 was used as statistic software . P 〈 0. 05 was considered statistically significant. Results Both in extubation successful and failure groups, GCS and Four were significantly different ( all P 〈0. 05 ). Howerer, there were no statistically significant in the other factors . There were significantly differences between GCS and Four in predicting extubation results (P =0. 012). Logistic multiple regression showed that Four and GCS grade were predictive factor of extubation failure (P = 0. 041 ). Conclusions The result suggests that it is statistically significant to use GCS and Four as factors to predict extubation results . It can be widely used to help medical personnels monitoring the changes of patients'clinicalconditions, judging prognosis, and making treatment plan in NICU . Wether other factors would effect the extubation results, more prospective, randomized controlled studies were needed .
出处 《中华急诊医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期1314-1318,共5页 Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
关键词 神经危重症 拔除气管插管 成功率 失败率 格拉斯哥昏迷评分 四分法评分 回顾性 影响因素 Neurological intensive care unit Extubation Success rate Failure rate Glasgow Coma Scale Full outline of unresponsiveness score Retrospective Influence factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Epstein SK. Predicting extubation failure: is it in (on) the cards [J]. Chest, 2001, 120 (4): 1061-1063.
  • 2Tanios MA, Nevins ML, Hendra KP, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the role of weaning predictors in clinical decision making [J]. Crit Care Med, 2006, 34 (10): 2530-2535.
  • 3Epstein SK. Putting it all together to predict extubation outcome[J. Intensive Care Med, 2004, 30 (7): 1255-1257.
  • 4Khamiees M, Raju P, Degirolamo A, et al. Predictors of extubation outcome in patients who have successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial [J]. Chest, 2001, 120 (4): 1262-1270.
  • 5Smina M, Salam A, Khamiees M, et al. Cough peak flows and extubation outcomes [J]. Chest, 2003, 124 (1): 262-268.
  • 6Vallverdu I, Calaf N, Subirana M, et al. Clinical characteristics, respiratory functional parameters, and outcome of a two-hour T- piece trial in patients weaning from mechanical ventilation [ J ]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1998, 158 (6) : 1855-1862.
  • 7Salam A, Tilluckdharry L, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, et al. Nleurologic status, cough, secretions and extubation outcomes [ J . Intensive Care Med, 2004, 30 (7) : 1334-1339.
  • 8Koutsoukou A, Perraki H, Raftopoulou A, et al, Respiratory mechanics in brain-damaged patients [ J ]. Intensive Care Med, 2006, 32 (12): 1947-1954.
  • 9Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, et al. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score [ J]. Ann Neurol, 2005, 58 (4) : 585-593.
  • 10I Namen AM, Ely EW, Tatter SB, et al. Predictors of successful extubation in neurosurgical patients [ J ]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001, 163 (3 Pt 1): 658-664.

二级参考文献21

  • 1邓春发,丁祥武,孟宪明.有效人工通气时机对心肺脑复苏的影响[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2004,13(11):772-773. 被引量:16
  • 2王彦,张淑文,王超,王宝恩.多器官功能障碍综合征患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素分析[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2006,15(11):1010-1013. 被引量:12
  • 3袁光雄,付林,罗自勉,许俊.急诊重症监护病房心肺复苏成功相关因素分析[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2006,11(6):407-408. 被引量:8
  • 4Apostolopoulou E, Bakakos P, Katostaras T, et al. Incidence and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in four muhidisciplinary intensive care units [J]. Respir Care, 2003, 48 (7) : 681-688.
  • 5Bauer TT, Ferrer R, Angrill J , et al. Ventilator associated pneumonia : incidence, risk factors , and microbiology [J]. Semin Respir Infect, 2000, 15 (3): 272-279.
  • 6Dodek P, Keenan S, Cook D, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the prevention of ventilator- associated pneumonia [J]. Ann Intem Med , 2004, 141 (3): 305-313.
  • 7Ben- Nun A, Ahman E, Best LA. Emergency percutaneous tra- cheostomy in trauma patients: an early experience[ J]. Ann Tho- rac Surg, 2004, 77(3) : 1045 - 1047.
  • 8. Major KM, Hui T, Wilson MT, et al. Objective indications for early tracheostomy after blunt head trauma[J]. Am J Surg, 2003, 186(6) : 615 -619.
  • 9Romero J, Vari A, Gambarrutta C, et al. Tracheostomy timing in traumatic spinal cord injury[ J l. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18 (10): 1452 - 1457.
  • 10Griffiths J, Barber VS, Morgan L, et al. Systematic review and meta - analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult pa- tients undergoing arificial ventilation [ J ]. BMJ, 2005, 330 (7502) : 1243.

共引文献38

同被引文献76

  • 1迟大明,朱悦.颈髓损伤后气管切开相关因素分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(12):899-902. 被引量:19
  • 2Epstein SK.Predicting extubation failure:is it in (on)the cards[J].Chest,2001,120(4):1061-1063.
  • 3Frutos-Vivar F,Ferguson ND,Esteban A,et al.Risk factors for extubation failure in patients following a successful spontaneous breathing trial[J].Chest,2006,130(6):1664-1671.
  • 4Namen AM,Ely EW,Tatter SB,et al.Predictors of successful extubation in neurosurgical patients[J].Arn J Respir Crit Care Med,2001,163(3 Pt 1):658-664.
  • 5Wijdicks EF,Borel CO.Respiratory management in acute neurologic illness[J].Neurology,1998,50(1):11-20.
  • 6Michael Z,Rolando B.Tracheostomy in the critically ill patient:who,when,and how?[J].Clin Pul Med,2006,13 (8):111-120.
  • 7Berney S, Bragge P, Granger C, et al. The acute respir- atory management of cervical spinal cord injury in the first 6 weeks after injury: a systematic review [ J ]. Spinal Cord, 2011,49( 1 ) :17-29.
  • 8Call M S, Kutcher M E, Izenberg R A, et al. Spinal cord injury: outcomes of ventilatory weaning and extuba- tion[ J ]. J Trauma, 2011,71 (6) : 1673-1679.
  • 9Stahel P F, Moore T A, Vanderheiden T F. Timing of tracheostomy after anterior cervical spine fixation [ J ]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013,75 (3) :538-539.
  • 10Choi H J, Paeng S H, Kim S T, et al. The Effectiveness of Early Tracheostomy (within at least 10 Days) in Cervi- cal Spinal Cord Injury Patients [ J ]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2013,54 ( 3 ) : 220-224.

引证文献11

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部