口语测试评分标准的现代测试学分析被引量：10

Analysis of Speaking Test Rating Criteria by Using the Modern Test Theory

导出

摘要本研究运用多层面Rasch测量模型,分析了朗读和口头陈述两种口语考试任务评分维度的设置及评分量表的使用情况。结果表明,口头陈述任务的一个评分维度设置不够合理,两个量表的等级之间都存在非等距性问题,而且口头陈述任务评分量表的某些等级与考生的能力之间出现了负增长现象,即考生的能力越强得分反而越低。这些信息对于修改和完善评分维度和评分量表具有非常重要的意义。 By using many-facet Rasch measurement model, the current study analyzed the fimess of rating dimension setting and scale distribution of two speaking tasks, namely reading aloud and oral presentation. The results revealed that one of the rating dimensions of oral presentation was inappropriate and the points on the two rating scales were both not evenly spaced. What＇s worse, negative growth on certain scales was found for students with better ability on the oral presentation task, that is, some of the less able were given higher scales. These are of great importance to the improvement of the rating dimensions and scales.

作者孙海洋魏梅

机构地区中国科学院大学外语系天津外国语大学英语学院

出处《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期66-70,共5页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基金中国科学院大学2011年院长基金B(项目编号:Y15102MN00) 中国外语教育基金(项目编号:ZGWYJYJJ2012A26)的阶段性成果

关键词口语测试评分标准评分维度评分量表多层面RASCH模型 speaking test rating criteria rating dimension rating scale many-facet Rasch model

分类号 H0 [语言文字—语言学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献30

1Bachman, L. & A. Palmer. 1996. Language Testing in Practice : De- signing and Developing Useful Language Tests[ M ]. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
2Beglar,D. 2010. A Rasch-based validation of the vocabulary size test [ J]. Language Testing ,27 ( 1 ) : 101 - 118.
3Bond, T. & C. Fox. 2007. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences [ M ]. Mahwah: Laurence Erl- baum Associates.
4Bonk, W. & G. Ockey. 2003. A many-facet Rasch analysis of the sec- ond language group oral discussion task [ J ]. Language Testing, 20 (1) :89 -110.
5Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Refer- ence for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment [ M ]. Cam- bridge : Cambridge University Press.
6Eider, C. 1993. How do subject specialists construe classroom lan- guage proficiency? [ J]. Language Testing, 10( 3 ) :235 - 254.
7ETS. 2001. TSE and SPEAK Score User Guide(2001 - 2002 edi- tion) [ M ]. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
8Fox, C. & J. Jones. 1998. Uses of Rasch modeling in counseling psy- chology research [ J ]. Journal of Counseling Psychology,45 ( 1 ) :30 -45.
9Grove, E. & A. Brown. 2001. Tasks and criteria in a test of oral com- munication skills for first-year health science students:Where from? [ J]. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 10 ( 1 ) :37 - 47.
10Isaacs, T. 2008. Toward defining a valid assessment criterion of pro- nunciation proficiency in non-native English-speaking graduate students[ J ]. Canadian Modem Language Review, 64 ( 4 ) : 555 - 580.