摘要
胡适《章实斋先生年谱》一书曾被称为使"章学诚其人其学从隐晦走向昌明"、"大大拓展了章学诚思想学术研究的深度和广度"的著作,实则在文献解读特别是新史学方向的引导上,存在颇多问题。《文史通义》、《校雠通义》二书迄今仍可谓是家喻户晓的"古典名著",而"六经皆史"诸说也迄无比较公认的确解。究其始作俑者,胡适对于章学诚"六经皆史"的有意误解不能免责。
Hu Shi＇s work The Annals of Mr.Zhang Shi-Zhai is regarded as a work which making Zhang Xue-cheng himself and his learning moving from obscure to flourishing and has greatly expanded the depth and breadth of academic research about his thought.Actually,there existed many problems in the literature interpretation,especially in the guidance of the new historiography.Wenshitongyi and Jiaochoutongyi are two well-known ＂classic works＂ even now and the saying that ＂six classics are all history＂ which have no accurate understanding and are not generally accepted now.Among the initiators,Hu Shi can not disclaimer because of his purposely misunderstanding of Zhang Xue-cheng＇s concept of ＂six classics are all history＂.
出处
《衡阳师范学院学报》
2012年第5期89-96,共8页
Journal of Hengyang Normal University
关键词
《章实斋先生年谱》
章学诚
胡适
姚名达
何炳松
The Annals of Mr.Zhang Shi-Zhai
Zhang Xue-cheng
Hu Shi
Yao Ming-da
He Bing-song
