期刊文献+

Implagraphy牙颌面锥形束CT不同扫描体位的辐射剂量对比研究 被引量:2

Dose comparison of different scan projections of Implagraphy cone beam computed tomography for dental maxillofacial use
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的测算Implagraphy牙颌面锥形束CT(CBCT)体模不同扫描体位的组织器官吸收剂量、当量剂量及有效剂量,为相应的防护措施提供客观依据。方法使用仿真成年男性头颈部体模及热释光剂量计,分别测量ImplagraphyCBCT下颌、上颌及颞下颌关节(TMJ)扫描时脑垂体、眼晶状体、腮腺、颌下腺、舌下腺、颅骨板障、下颌松质骨、颈椎松质骨、颊部皮肤、颈部皮肤、甲状腺、食管及口腔黏膜等组织器官的吸收剂量,计算眼晶状体、皮肤的当量剂量,及ImplagraphyCBCT不同扫描体位的有效剂量E1990及E2007。结果ImplagraphyCBCT各扫描体位的吸收剂量分别为:下颌扫描(0.99±0.09)-(12.85±0.09)mGy,上颌扫描(0.93±0.01)~(13.07±0.02)mGy,TMJ扫描(0.68±0.01)~(10.18±0.04)mGy,相同组织器官在不同扫描体位的吸收剂量的差异具有统计学意义(F=19.61~30992.27,P〈0.05)。在不同扫描体位,眼晶状体及皮肤的当量剂量分别为(1.11±0.07)~(5.76±0.06)mSv和(6.96±0.06)~(10.64±0.07)mSv,差异具有统计学意义(F=4473.02、9385.50,P〈0.05)。有效剂量层1990及E2007分别为:下颌扫描(191.35±1.53)和(325.17±2.58)μSv,上颌扫描(106.62±2.17)和(226.28±2.81)μSv,TMJ扫描(104.21±1.02)和(142.36±1.90)μSv。结论在牙颌面CBCT检查过程中,采用尽可能小的扫描视野、准确地扫描体位,正确使用铅胶帽、围领及防护镜等屏蔽措施,使X射线辐射照射保持在可以合理达到的尽可能低的水平。 Objective To evaluate the subject's absorbed dose, equivalent dose and effective dose. Methods The CBCT unit was Implagraphy and three scan projections were selected such as mandible, maxilla and temporamandibular joint (TMJ). Thermoluminescent dosimeter tubes were used to record the absorbed dose at special positions in the head and neck region of an adult skull and tissue-equivalent phantom. 16 interested organs included pituitary, lens, parotid glands, submandibular glands, sublingual glands, diploe, spongy bone of the chin and cervical vertebra, skins of cheeks and nuchal region, thyroid and esophagus. The absorbed dose was measured in these organs, and then the effective dose (E199o, E2007 ) were calculated according to different ICRP tissue weighting factors. Results The absorbed dose of mandible, maxilla and TMJ scan varied from (0. 99 ±0. 09) to ( 12. 85± 0.09 ) mGy, (0. 93 ± 0. 01 ) to (13.07± 0. 02)mGy and (0.68 ±0. 01 ) to (10. 18 ± 0. 04)mGy. There was significant difference among the three scan projections ( F = 19. 61 - 30992.27, P 〈 0. 05 ). The equivalent doses of lens and skin were ( 1.11 ± 0. 07 ) - (5.76 ± 0. 06) mSv and (6. 96± 0. 06 ) - ( 10.64 ± 0. 07 ) mSv. There was significant difference among the three scan projections (F = 4473.02, 9385.50, P 〈 0. 05). The effective dose( E1990, E2007 ) was [(191.35±1.53) , (325.17 ±2.58) μSv] for mandible scan, [(106.62 ±2.17) ,(226.28±2.81)μSv] for maxilla scan , [ ( 104. 21 ±1.02), ( 142. 36 ± 1.90) μSv] for TMJ scan,respectively. Conclusions The valid measurement should be taken to reduce the subject' s dose such as a careful history and clinical examination before the performance of CBCT, the latest risk/benefit assessment, precise scan position, the shielding of thyroid as well as brain and the smaller volume size as well.
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期535-538,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
关键词 锥形束CT 吸收剂量 当量剂量 有效剂量 Cone beam computed tomography Absorbed dosage Equivalent dosage Effective dosage
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiologieal protection. Ann:ICRP,2007:37(2-4).
  • 2International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann: ICRP, 1991:21 (1-3).
  • 3Underhill TE, Chilvarquer I, Kimura K, et al. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology:Part I. Absorbed doses to critical organs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1988, 66( 1 ) : 111-120.
  • 4Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, et al. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol, 2009, 82 (973) : 35-40.
  • 5Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofaeial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 106( 1 ) : 106-114.
  • 6Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is Cone-Beam CT and how does it work . Dent Clin N Am, 2008, 52(4) : 707-730.
  • 7Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Araki M. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row muhidetector helical CT. J Oral Sci, 2006, 48 ( 1 ) :27-34.
  • 8蒋伟,林大全,樊庆文,王远萍.成都剂量体模(CDP)组织等效材料辐射等效性评价[J].中国测试技术,2006,32(6):69-71. 被引量:9
  • 9Fahrig R, Dixon R, Payne T, et al. Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system. Med Phys, 2006, 33 (12) : 4541-4550.
  • 10Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, et al. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxinofaeial radiology: CB Mereuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofae Radiol, 2006,35(4) : 219-226.

二级参考文献11

  • 1张加易,袁中凡,林大全,杨家鉴.组织辐射等效材料等效性验证方法的探讨[J].中国测试技术,2006,32(2):24-26. 被引量:3
  • 2林大全 吴泽勇.仿真人体模型技术与理工医交叉学科的发展[J].光子学报,2005,34(3):146-150.
  • 3D.R.White.Tissue Substitutes in Experimental Radiation Physics[J].Medical Physics,1978,5(6):467-479.
  • 4Jeffrey H.Kleck,James B.Smathers,F.Eugene Holly etc.Anthropomorphic Radiation Therapy Phantoms:A Quantitative Assessment of Tissue Substitute[J].Medical Physics,1990,17(5):800-806.
  • 5W.V.Mayneord.The Significance of the Roentgen[J].ACTA of the International Union Against Cancer,1937,2(2):271-283.
  • 6ICRU Report 44,Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement[S],1989.
  • 7中国计量测试学会电离辐射专业委员.辐射剂量学常用数据[M].北京:中国计量出版社,1987.
  • 8曾丹庆,蔡祖龙.全身CT诊断学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1996.
  • 9D.R.White,H.Q.Woodard,S.M.Hammond.Average Soft-Ti ssue and Bone Models for use in Radiation Dosimetry[J].The British Journal of Radiology,1987,60:907-913.
  • 10D.R.White,Christondoulos Constantinou.Anthropomorphic Phantom Materials[J].Progress in Medical Radiation Physics,1982,1:133-193.

共引文献14

同被引文献33

  • 1James K, Liu Yi, Reyes C, et al. Advanced Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics [J]. SeminOrthod, 2011, 17(1): 57-71.
  • 2Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre- surgical assessment of implant sites[J]. J Calif Dent Assoc, 2003, 31(11): 825-833.
  • 3Arai Y, Honda K, Iwai K, et al. Practical model "3DX" of limited cone-beam X-ray CT for dental use[J]. Int Con- gerSer, 2001, 1230(7): 713-718.
  • 4Ludlow J, Laura E, Stuart C. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations -The impact of 2007 In- ternational Commission on Radiological Protection recom- mendations regarding dose calculation [J]. Journal of the American Dental Association, 2008, 139(9): 1237-1243.
  • 5Ding GX, Coffey CW. Radiation dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in an image-guided radiother- apy procedure[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncol- ogy, Biology, Physics, 2009, 73(2): 610-617.
  • 6ICRP. 1990 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection: Annals of the ICRP, 21 (1-3), 1991. Annals oI Nuclear Energy, 1992, 19(1): 51-52.
  • 7Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, et al. Radiation ex- posure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice com- puted tomography, cone beam computed tomography sys- tems and conventional radiography[J]. Dentomaxillofac Ra- diol, 2004, 33(2): 83-86.
  • 8Hashimoto K, Arai Y, lwai K, et al. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row belical CT machine[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol oral Radiol Endod, 2003, 95 (3): 371-377.
  • 9Iwai K, Anti Y, Hashimoto K, et al. Estimation of effec- tive dose from limited cone beam X-ray CT examination[J]. Dental Radiaol, 2000, 40(4): 251-259.
  • 10Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, et al. Comparison be- tween effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxiUofacial applications[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2009, 71(3): 461-468.

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部