摘要
目的探讨直接与间接采血方法对血常规检测值的影响。方法选择我院2011年3月～2012年2月住我科治疗的既要采血又要输液的患者共36例,将其随机分为两组各18例,对照组采用直接采血方法,观察组采用间接采血方法;比较两组受试者的血液标本与血常规检测值。结果间接采血组患者血红蛋白浓度及白细胞计数与直接采血组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而间接采血组患者血小板计数高于直接采血组,血标本与抗凝剂混合时间长于直接采血组,两组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论间接采血方法不适用于血小板疾病患者的检测。
Objective To investigate the impact of direct and indirect blood collection methods on the blood test values. Methods Will live in hospital from 2011 to 2012 department treatment of patients with blood but also the infusion of the total of 36 cases. They were randomly divided into two groups, 18 cases in each group. The control group by direct blood sampling methods, the observation group was indirect blood collection methods; Subjects＂ blood samples and blood test values were compared between the two groups. Results Indirect blood hemoglobin concentration and white blood cell count of patients with direct blood group was no significant difference （P 〉 0.05）; Indirect blood group of patients with platelet count higher than direct blood group, blood samples with anticoagulant mixing time was longer than the direct blood group, the two groups compared to a statistically significant difference （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Indirect blood collection method is not suitable for the detection of platelet disease.
出处
《中国现代医生》
2012年第31期99-100,共2页
China Modern Doctor
关键词
直接采血
间接采血
血常规
Direct blood
Indirect blood
Rutine blood test
