期刊文献+

雷替曲塞联合奥沙利铂治疗术后复发晚期大肠癌的疗效观察 被引量:10

Clinical analysis of raltitrexed plus oxaliplatinl in treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with postoperative recurence
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨雷替曲塞(Raltitrexed)联合奥沙利铂(L-OHP)治疗术后复发晚期大肠癌的疗效和安全性。方法 84例术后复发晚期大肠癌患者分为3组:A组38例,奥沙利铂(L-OHP)130mg/m2,d1,静脉滴注3h,甲酰四氢叶酸(LV)200mg/m2,静脉滴注2h,续予5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)400mg/m2静脉滴注6~8 h,连用5 d。B组27例,伊利替康(CPT-11)180mg/m2,d1,静脉滴注1.5 h,甲酰四氢叶酸(LV)200mg/m2,静脉滴注2 h,续予5-Fu 400mg/m2静脉滴注6~8 h,连用5 d。C组19例,奥沙利铂(L-OHP)130mg/m2,d1,静脉滴注3h,雷替曲塞(Raltitrexed)3mg/m2,d1,静脉注射15min。三组均每3周重复1次。结果 A、B、C三组有效率(RR)分别为15.8%、18.5%和36.8%;A、B组分别与C组比较,两组RR比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组的疾病控制率(DCR)分别为65.8%、70.4%和78.9%;A、B组与C组比较,两组DCR比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组的中位疾病进展时间(TTP)分别为6.1个月、6.9个月和8.2个月。A组与C组比较,两组TTP差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组与C组比较,两组TTP差异无统计学意义。毒性反应方面,C组的黏膜炎发生率明显低于A和B组,具有显著差异;其肝功能异常发生率高于A和B组;其神经毒性与A组基本相同;其腹泻及脱发发生率明显低于B组。结论雷替曲塞联合L-OHP(TOMOX方案)在术后复发晚期结直肠癌的治疗上近期效果优于FOLFOX及FOLFIRI方案,且毒性反应低,患者耐受性好,尤其适合老年患者。 Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of raltitrexed plus oxaliplatinl in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with postoperative recurence. Methods 84 cases of ad- vanced colorectal cancer with postoperative recurence were divided into three groups. 38 cases in group A were given oxaliplatinl 130mg/m2 over 3 hours infusion on day 1, leucovorin 200mg/m2 infusion over 2 hours from day 1 to day 5 and 5-fluorouracil 400mg/m2 for 6 - 8 hours as the same way. 27 cases in group B were given irinotecan 180mg/m2 over 1.5 hours infusion on day 1, leucovorin 200mg/m2 infusion over 2 hours from day 1 to day 5 and 5-fluorouracil 400mg/m2for 6 - 8 hours as the same way. 19 cases in group C were given intravenously raltitrexed 15 minitues drip with 3mg/m2 on day 1, oxaliplatinl 3 hours drip with 130mg/m2 on day 1. The regimen of three groups repeated every 3 weeks was a cycle. Results Groups A and B and C could be evaluated respectively. RR were 15.8%, 18.5% and 36. 8%, comparison of A or B and C in RR has statistic significance. DCR were 65.8% ,70. 4% and 78.9% respectively,comparison of A or B and C in DCR has no statistic significance. And median TIP were 5.2,6. 1 and 8. 3 months respectively, comparison of A and C in TFP has statistic significance, but no significance existed in B and C. As for toxic reaction, the incidence of mueosltis in group C is lower than that in group A and B, there is statistic sig- nificance among them. The incidence of hepatorental toxicity in group C is higer than that in group A and B;the incidence of nervous toxicity in group C is the same as that in group A;the incidence of diarrhea and alopecia in group C is lower than that in group B. Conclusions The recent clinical efficacy of Tomox is better than FOLFOX and FOLFIRI in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with postoperative re- curence, low toxic reaction and well tolerated, especially in the elderly.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2012年第5期440-442,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 雷替曲塞 奥沙利铂 伊利替康 结直肠肿瘤 Raltitrexed Oxaliplatinl Irinotecan Colorectal neoplasms
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献42

  • 1van CUTSEM E, OLIVEIRA J. ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2009, 20 Suppl 4: 61-63.
  • 2BENOIST S, NORDLINGER B. The role of preoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2009, 16(9) : 2385-2390.
  • 3MAUGHAN TS, JAMES RD, KERR DJ, et al. Comparison of intermittent and continuous palliative chemotherapy for advanced coloreetal cancer: a multieentre randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 361 (9356) : 457-464.
  • 4POPOV I, CARRATO A, SOBRERO A, et al. Raltitrexed(Tomudex)versus standard leucovorin-modulated bolus 5-fluorouracil: Results from the randomised phase Ⅲ Pan-European trial in adjuvant colon cancer 01 (PETACC-1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2008, 44 ( 15 ) : 2204-2211.
  • 5VALENTINI V, COCO C, MINSKY BD, et al. Randomized, multicenter, phase IIb study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in T3 mid-distal rectal cancer: rahitrexed + oxaliplatin + radiotherapy versus cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil + radiotherapy [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 70(2) : 403-412.
  • 6SCHEITHAUER W, KORNEK GV, RADERER M, et al. Randomized muhicenter phase Ⅱ trial of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan versus rahitrexed as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20( 1 ) : 165-172.
  • 7DUCREUX M, BOUCHE O, PIGNON JP, et al. Randomised trial comparing three different schedules of infusional 5FU and raltitrexed alone as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal Final results of the Federation Franeophone de Cancerologie Digestive (FFCD)9601 trial[J]. Oncology, 2006, 70 (3): 222-230.
  • 8MAUGHAN TS, JAMES RD, KERR DJ, et al. Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic eoloreetal eaneer: a multicentre randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2002, 359(9317): 1555-1563.
  • 9HIND D, TAPPENDEN P, TUMUR I, et al. The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2008, 12 ( 15 ) : 151-162.
  • 10Grothey A, Sargent D, Goldberg RM, et al. Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(7): 1209- 1214.

共引文献29

同被引文献60

  • 1吴建兵,王汉姣,王顺金,李凌,冯龙.雷替曲塞联合L-OHP与5-Fu/LV联合L-OHP方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的临床疗效比较[J].肿瘤防治研究,2007,34(9):711-713. 被引量:14
  • 2JEMAL A,SIEGEL R, WARD E, et al. Cancer statistics,2008[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2008,58(2) : 71 -96.
  • 3GRAVALOS C,GARCIA ESCOBAR I,GARCIA ALFONSO P, etal. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stages II,IE and IV of colon canc-er[ J]. Clin Transl Oncol,2009 , 11(8): 526 -533.
  • 4SHAHROKNI A,RAJEBI M R, SAIF M W. Toxicity and efficacyof 5 - fluorouracil and capecitabine in a patient with TYMS genepolymorphism : a challenge or a dilemma [ J ]. Clin ColorectalCancer, 2009, 8(4) : 231 -234.
  • 5WILSON K S,MALFAIR T S C. Raltitrexed : optimism and reality[J] . Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol, 2009 , 5(11): 1447 -1454.
  • 6HIND D, TAPPENDEN P, TUMUR I,et al. The use of irinote-can,oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colo-rectal cancer : systematic review and economic evaluation [ J ].Health Technol Assess, 2008,12(15) : iii-ix, xi - 162.
  • 7KHOURI C, GUIU B,CERCUEIL J P, et al. Raltitrexed and oxa-liplatin hepatic arterial infusion for advanced colorectal cancer : aretrospective study [ J ]. Anticancer Drugs, 2010, 21(6) : 656 -661.
  • 8VYZULA R, KOCAKOVA I,DEMLOVA R, et al. Raltitrexedplus oxaliplatin in the second - line treatment of metastatic colorec-tal cancer[ J]. Neoplasmaf 2006, 53(2) : 119 -127.
  • 9KIMGP, SARGENT D J, MAHONEY MR, et al. Phase 皿 non-inferiority trial comparing irinotecan with oxaliplatin,fluorouracil,and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma pre-viously treated with fluorouracil : N9841 [ J ]. J Clin Oncol,2009,27(17): 2848 -2854.
  • 10SCHEITHAUER W, KORNEK G V, SCHUELL B,et al. Second-line treatment with oxaliplatin + raltitrexed in patients with ad-vanced colorectal cancer failing fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin - basedchemotherapy[ J]. Ann Oncol, 2001, 12(5) : 709 -714.

引证文献10

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部