赛博与后人类主义被引量：35

Cyborg and Posthumanism

导出

摘要起源于控制论的"赛博"受到生物学、人工智能等领域的极大关注,并引发人们对"人类日益技术化"和"技术物日益人格化"高科技现象的哲学思考,这种思考使我们进入后人类主义。后人类主义科学观试图打破传统的二元对立范畴,并建立一个所有"中心主义"都崩塌的赛博世界:赛博是主客体共同建构的产物,并由此走向一种新本体论——我们在建构世界的同时,世界也以同样的方式在建构着我们,历史本身就是一个社会与自然、主体与客体共同演化的过程。 With the highly development of science and technology, there has been an increasing attention to the issue of eyborg which is origina- ted from cybernetics in the field of biology and artificial intelligence, thus men need to trigger the high--tech phenomenon of ＂increasing techni- calization of human ＂ and ＂increasing personalization of technical artifacts＂, which makes us step into posthumanism. The science view of post- humanism tries to break the conventional categories of dualism and build up a cyhorg world in which all centrism are collapsed： cyborg is a prod- uct constructed collectively by subject and object. The cyborg world leads us into a new ontology： when we are trying to construct the world, it is constructing us in the same way at the meantime. History is a co--evolving process of society and nature as well as subject and object.

作者冉聃蔡仲

机构地区南京大学哲学系

出处《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第10期72-76,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基金国家社科基金项目:当代科学技术与社会的"本体论"研究(项目编号:12BZX021)

关键词赛博后人类主义具身性新本体论 cyhorg posthumanism embodiment new ontology

分类号 N031 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1Andrew Pickring. The Cybernetic Brain[M]. University of Chicago Press, 2011. 43.
2Andrew Pickering. Cybernetics and the Mangle: Ashby, Beer and Pask [J]. Social Studies of Science,2002. 32(3).
3Chris Weedon. Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist The- ory[M]. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell, 1997.32.
4N. Katherine Hayles. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics[M]. U- niversity of Chieago Press, 1999. 195.
5[法]福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成,杨远婴,译.北京:生活?读书?新知三联书店,2007.224.
6N. Katherine Hayles. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics[M]. U- niversity of Chicago Press, 1999. 285.
7冯晓虎.论莱柯夫术语“Embodiment”译名[J].同济大学学报（社会科学版）,2010,21(1):86-97. 被引量：21
8N. Katherine Hayles. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informaties[M]. U- niversity of Chicago Press, 1999.2.
9Andrew Piekring. A Gallery of Monsters:Cybernetics and . Self-Organization, 1940-1970, in Franehi S,Gi~zeldere G (eds) Mechanical Bodies, Computational Minds: Artificial Intelligence from Automata to Cyborgs, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005. 229-245.
10Andrew Piekring. Cyborg History and the World War Ⅱ Regime [J]. Jianghai Academic Journal,2005.6.

二级参考文献21

1李恒威,盛晓明.认知的具身化[J].科学学研究,2006,24(2):184-190. 被引量：284
2A Pickering. "Science as Alchemy", in J. Scott and d. Keates (eds) The Schools of Thought[M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001: 194.
3A Pickering. "On Becoming", in D. Idhe and E. Selinger, (eds) Chasing Teehnoscience[M]. Bloomington& Indian- apolis: Indiana University Press, 2003: 100.
4http://www. leydesdorff. net/ontology/ontology.pdf.
5A . Pickering (ed). Science as Practice and Culture[M]. Chicago and London: the University of Chicago Press, 1992.
6Bruno Latour. We Have Never Been Modern[M]. Cam- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993: 95.
7K. Knorr Cetina. How Superorganisms Change? [J], So- cial Studies of Science, 1995, 25(1): 119-147.
8P. Galison. Image and Logic: a Material Culture of Micro- physics[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1997.
9L. Daston. On Scientific Observation [J]. Isis 99 (1) , 2008 : 98.
10G. C. Bowker. Biodiversity Datadiversity[J]. Social Stud- ies of Science, 2000,30(5): 676-677.