论女性主义技术科学研究——当代女性主义科学研究的后人类主义转向被引量：2

On Feminism Technoscience Studies the Posthumanism Turn of Contemporary Feminist Science Studies

下载PDF

导出

摘要女性主义技术科学研究标志着当代女性主义科学研究的后人类主义转向。它以哈拉维的情境知识论和赛博本体论为主要理论来源及思想动力,以图安娜的互动主义、芭拉德的能动实在论和格罗兹的身体研究为代表,主张将对科学技术的批判与对父权制文化、性别关系和身份政治的批判结合起来,引导人们在技术科学实践和文化中去探究科学与技术、性别、自然(包括身体)、文化(社会)等之间辩证互动和异质融合的后人类主义特征的内在动态关系。这有效地摆脱了当前女性主义研究中生物决定论和社会建构论之争所陷入的本质主义表征困境。 Feminism Technoscience Studies mark the Posthumanism turn of contemporary feminist science studies. They are derived from Donna Haraway＇s situated knowledge theory and eyborg on- tology and represented by Nancy Tuana＇s interaetionism, Karen Barad＇s agential realism, and Eliz- abeth Grosz＇s body studies. They argue the critique of science and technology should be combined with the posthumanism critique of patriarchy culture, gender relationship and identification politics, guiding people to explore the inherent dynamic relationships of post-humanism characteristics of dia- lectical interaction and heterogeneous integration between science and technology, gender, nature （including body）, and culture （society）, which e[[ectively avoid the dilemma of representationalism brought by the debates between biological determinism and social construetionism in current feminist studies.

作者肖雷波柯文吴文娟

机构地区南京信息工程大学公共管理学院南京大学哲学系南京信息工程大学语言文化学院

出处《科学与社会》 CSSCI 2013年第3期57-72,共16页 Science and Society

基金 2012年度江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目"当代STS中的技科学研究"(项目编号:2012SJB720010) 2012年国家社科基金重大项目"中医文化核心价值体系及现代转型研究"(项目编号:12&ZD114) 南京信息工程大学校科研启动项目(项目编号:SK20110118) 2009年国家公派研究生项目(项目编号:2009619089)资助

关键词哈拉维图安娜芭拉德格罗兹后人类主义 Donna Haraway, Nancy Tuana, Karen Barad, Posthumanism

分类号 N02 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献24

1蔡仲,肖雷波.STS:从人类主义到后人类主义[J].哲学动态,2011(11):80-85. 被引量：13
2肖雷波.后人类主义视角下的环境管理问题研究[J].自然辩证法研究,2013,29(9):53-59. 被引量：4
3Ahmed S. Imaginary Prohibitions:Some Pieliminary Remarks on the Founding Gestures of the New Materialism[J].European Journal of Women's Studies,2008,(01):23-39.
4Iris,van der Tuin. New Feminist Materialisms[J].Women's Studies International Forum,2011,(34):271-277.
5Alaimo S,Hekman S. Material Feminisms[M].Bloomington:Indiana University Press,2008.90.
6(A)sberg C,Lykke N. Feminist Technoscience Studies[J].European Journal of Women's Studies,2010,(17):299-305.
7(A)sberg C. Enter Cyborg:Tracing the Historiography and Ontological Turn of Feminist Technoscience Studies[J].International Journal of Feminist Technoscience,2010,(01):1.
8Hekman S. The Material of Knowledge-Feminist Disclosure[M].Bloomington,Indiana:Indiana University Press,2010.
9Lykke N. The Timeliness of Post-Constructionism[J].Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research,2010,(02):131-136.
10(A)sberg C. The Timely Ethics of Posthumanist Gender Studies[J].Feministische Studien,2013,(01):7-12.

二级参考文献44

1安德鲁·皮克林.实践的冲撞-时间、力量与科学[M].邢冬梅译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004.226,249(注[18]),21,9-10,22-23,226,6.
2Andrew Pickring. The Cybernetic Brain[M]. University of Chicago Press, 2011. 43.
3Andrew Pickering. Cybernetics and the Mangle: Ashby, Beer and Pask [J]. Social Studies of Science,2002. 32(3).
4Chris Weedon. Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist The- ory[M]. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell, 1997.32.
5N. Katherine Hayles. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics[M]. U- niversity of Chieago Press, 1999. 195.
6[法]福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成,杨远婴,译.北京:生活?读书?新知三联书店,2007.224.
7N. Katherine Hayles. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics[M]. U- niversity of Chicago Press, 1999. 285.
8N. Katherine Hayles. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informaties[M]. U- niversity of Chicago Press, 1999.2.
9Andrew Piekring. A Gallery of Monsters:Cybernetics and . Self-Organization, 1940-1970, in Franehi S,Gi~zeldere G (eds) Mechanical Bodies, Computational Minds: Artificial Intelligence from Automata to Cyborgs, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005. 229-245.
10Andrew Piekring. Cyborg History and the World War Ⅱ Regime [J]. Jianghai Academic Journal,2005.6.