期刊文献+

100%正面碰撞中第二排女性假人的动力学响应特点 被引量:1

Dynamics response characteristics of second row female dummies in a 100% frontal crash test
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国乘用汽车第二排乘坐率高,对乘客员的保护力度不够。该文参考09版中国新车评价规程(C-NCAP)中的相关规则,研究了评价第二排乘员伤害的100%正面碰撞的试验方法和基于生物力学限值指标的定量评分方法。对新近上市29款车型进行试验。结果表明:第二排乘员颈部遭受致命伤害的17款,占59%;胸部遭受致命伤害的10款,占35%。对第二排座椅上混合Ⅲ型第5%百分位的女性假人动力学响应的分析结果表明:安全带肩带力与颈部拉伸力、胸部压缩量之间呈近似线性关系。安全带肩带是造成假人上躯干伤害的主要原因。因此,为有效降低这种伤害,应优化、调整普通安全带参数。 The second seat row has a high riding rate but a low rider protection level in vehicles running in China. This paper investigates test methods based on the 100% frontal impact test rule of 2009 version of China New Car Assessment Program (C-NCAP), and presents a quantitative evaluation method for the biomechanics limit value of the second row passengers. Tests in vehicle 100% frontal impacts for 29 types of vehicles recently coming into China's market showed that the second row occupants suffered fatal neck injury in 17 types of the vehicles (58.8% of total vehicle samples) and fatal chest injury in 10 types of vehicles (34.5% of total vehicle samples). The analyses show that the seat belt shoulder strap, neck tension force, and chest compression displacement have an approximately linear relationship in the dynamics response characteristics of mixed III type, the 5th percentile, female dummies in the second row seats. The results indicate that the occupant upper body injury is mainly caused by the safety belt shoulder strap. Therefore, parameter optimization and adjustment are necessary for common safety belts to effectively reduce the harm.
出处 《汽车安全与节能学报》 CAS 2012年第3期245-250,共6页 Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy
关键词 汽车安全 100%正面碰撞 第二排女性假人 评价方法 动力学响应 vehicle safety 100% frontal crash test the second row female dummy evaluation method dynamics response
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1HUANG Matthew. Vehicle Crash Mechanics[M].Boca Raton:Chemical Rubber Company (CRC) Press LLC,2002.
  • 2商恩义.正面碰撞中安全带对乘员的伤害的影响研究[A]湖南长沙,2009197-200.
  • 3Eppinger R,Sun E,Bandak F. Development of improved injury criteria for the assessment of advanced automotive restraint systems-Ⅱ[OL].http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/Crashworthines/revcriteria.pdf,1999.
  • 4孙振东;刘玉光;朱海涛.正面碰撞试验中后排乘员的伤害特性研究[A]吉林长春,200777-82.
  • 5Cuerden R W,Scott A W,Hassan A H,Mackay M. The injury experience of adult rear seat car passengers[A].Hannover,1997.
  • 6C-NCAP管理中心.C-NCAP管理规则(2012版)[S]天津:中国汽车技术研究中心,2012.
  • 7Ikari K. Rear occupant protection JNCAP test[A].2009.
  • 8Euro NCAP. Assessment protocol-adult occupant protection: European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP),Version 5.2[S].Europe:Euro NCAP,2010.
  • 9MASAYUKI Yaguchi,YUICHI Omoda,KOSHIRO Ono. Traffic accident analysis towards the development of an advanced frontal crash test dummy indispensable for further improving vehicle occupant protection performance[A].2011.
  • 10SAE International. Test device head contact duration analysis Surface Vehicle Information Report,2005-12[S].

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部